Topic: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! - page 2. (Read 2248 times)

Actually you don't get to invest in anything with your staff account, why don't you use an alt account and invest your whole life and see if I give a fuck.
You don't need to endorse anything whatsoever, the sole presence of a staff member as an investor is all it takes to fool the unsuspected.
The thing is that I don't trust you not even a bit, you are a hypocrite and you don't fear any God, so everything is possible and expected from such a person.
I'm not worried about you being scammed, I'm worried that your actions might really damage the reputation of this forum, we already have different rogue factions doing whatever they want, we certainly don't need another scandal yet by another moderator, I think we have had such scandals one too many times. so now you are excused to do whatever you desire with one of your alt accounts and only use your moderator account to beg for help in your job etc.

I don't think you have any fucking right whatsoever to tell me where to invest my motherfucking money. 

If it turns out Bruno scammed me (I have already OPENLY admitted this is a possibility) you can rest safely knowing I can afford it (since you seem preoccupied with other people's money).  I have not told ANYONE to invest in ANYFUCKINGTHING on this forum EVER.  I have not asked for nor argued for any trust to be added or removed.

Just because you're to stupid to understand the difference between "investing" in something and "endorsing" something doesn't change reality.

There probably was either A) No messages and gleb was just trying to spook me into just removing the feedback and blow smoke up my ass as part of his smear/harassment campaign and hope he actually found something at some point (and so far that's limited to some insane ramblings about Stake and Micro) or B) Some chancer PMd him offering (non-existent) info likely in exchange for money and Bruno got a hard-on instantly, but I'd put my money on the former.


Do you say these things without any degree of irony? If anyone needs meds or is off his meds it's you.


I think a more pertinent question would be when did you lose yours?


It has neutralised Gage's and has dampened the one on Glebs from my point of view, though suchmoon did say he would remove the feedback once I edited mine (which I haven't done yet).

The point is that here you're claiming that suchmoon is providing:
and

when in actual fact, suchmoon's positive trust rating will do nothing to alter the trust rating that the vast majority of folks on this forum will see. There is no "cover"... And as you already pointed out, anyone who digs into the trust, will see ALL the trust, both good and bad and can make up their own minds or investigate further.

So, your entire argument here is basically invalid.


Apparently so... because it is all in your head.


http://archive.is/Kpuzb#selection-2605.247-2605.293

I rest my case.

ORLY?
Tell me, what has changed? nothing has changed other than some trust scores on interwebz forum, however some people are basing their trust on the same scores that's why suchmoon is doing the countering for suspected extortionists and blatant account dealers not to mention ICO money collector probably to pay for some prostitutes and some drink(youtube channel my ass).


I actually see the ratings like this, it doesn't matter though, I'm just here to make everything public, when I see that people are doing something wrong especially those people in position of power, if I say something in real life I either get shot in the head or they would throw me in jail, here is no difference, I started to be vocal about it and again they shot me in the head and some of them threw me in front of a bus and some called me a scammer, so what is the difference between governments and this forum? they are doing the same shit all over again, here I can talk freely so I do.

He has shown time and time again he has absolutely no idea how trust, trust ratings, or the trust network work. This has been explained to him many times, but he has no desire to learn and instead prefers to continue talking nonsense.

At this point the best course of action is a blanket ignore.

ORLY?



You really don't understand how trust works do you? For the record... I'm running with the "Default" Trust settings for the board. That is to say, that I have not explicitly added nor excluded anyone. That is how Gleb's alt's appear to me. You'll note that suchmoon's "countering" does very little "from the outside".

No, you really don't. If you did you would realize how stupid you really sound.

How about you go and do some real work, earn some cash, and stop whining about other people's money.

My bad. I sourced an open pharmacy so that digaran could get his prescriptions filled, but instead he went there and took all the drugs, hence it's now closed. Proof, you ask? Reread the recent posts of his including the one I quoted above.

This fucker has totally and literally lost his fuckin mind.

Facts that are backed with no evidence. Blanket statements.

You also don't understand what I mean by 'rhetoric' and hence I conclude that you aren't even attempting to substantiate any kind of claim. You keep thinking that counter-ratings make someone look trustworthy.

I don't think that -1: -1 / +1 looks trustworthy and neither does 0: -1 / +3.

---

Your questions are just that: questions. Wild accusations with no substance behind them.

Have you seen the Altcoin announcement boards? You have got to be kidding me.

I think you are totally retarded, there is no blanket statements or rhetoric questions, these are all facts. I will also PM OgNasty to ask him to remove the positive trust he has left for Gleb 3 months ago or so because Gleb account has already changed hands several times and is now in the hands of suchmoon.

---

I also don't think that a staff should get involved in questionable, ICO activities, refer to FHF the newest moderator who has been in a warm bed with Bruno and his ICO. theymos really should take care of that because we don't want to tie this forum to some very shady ICOs especially when the *dev is a known lair and account seller plus he is in cahoots with DT2 members who'd blatantly counter legit negative feedbacks.

Note that Bruno couldn't ask suchmoon to tag Don hilary, so instead he asked suchmoon to counter Don's negative trust to say that he wins.

*dev=Bruno.

You're in luck. The pharmacy's open 24 hours, thus allowing you to fill your prescription ASAP.

Your constant false equivalences and extrapolations lead to such theories. With rhetoric and blanket statements you offer no substance behind them meaning that they're much less theories and moreso hypothetical ramblings.

---

Who are you trying to appeal to when you know that the cartel controls all of DefaultTrust?

Quoting and posting for more visibility. note that I think that certain somebody Bruno is referring here is actually suchmoon. what exactly happened after this post? yes suchmoon countered all the legit and valid negative feedbacks on Bruno's alts, because that's what suchmoon is good for, to provide a legitimate cover for untrustworthy individuals in order to deceive the public. note again that Gleb's alts now only have the look of trustworthy members from the outside, if you click on their profiles you'll still see their shady activities.

Was this an attempt to buy legitimacy for Gleb so that he could collect money in his ICO in order to pay suchmoon back? is this the sort of person she is? she has also countered other feedbacks to clear the way for suspected extortionists before. am I the only one who could actually see this?

No I don't. You're just making things up and taking things out of context. Of course he should have taken a loan rather than sell a trusted account, for obvious reasons. He also could have done numerous other things to get money that didn't involve scummy behaviour.


In other words, no. If anyone is using twisted logic here it's you, not to mention just making things up.



Hardly hysteria. Don't sell trusted accounts that can be used to scam. Not rocket science, is it? Had the accounts bruno loaned out or tried to sell asked for loans they would have likely got them. Two people have already stated that would have done so, one of whom has already paid the original debt.

He has two accounts (#6 and #7) in the top 10 number of posts.

---

Ironically enough, in a twisted sense of logic, hilariousandco has a problem with Bruno trying to enter into a transaction in which both parties consent to the terms, and no one is harmed, while he has stated he would prefer that he take out a loan, when the evidence suggests Bruno is not in a position to repay any loans.

In other words, hilariousandco would rather a lender get scammed than Bruno sell his account.

It appears as if the concept of selling an account causes mass hysteria to a certain group of people...

Just wow..

Bruno is one of the TOP OG legends on this forum imo, one of my favorite posters, and an ultimate crypto crime fighter..

He never got into the politics and the trust system much apparently, but was on top of the HIGH profile scams like Cryptsy..
The information that Bruno and others dug up has been used by the cours and all to put together the pieces of these massive scams..

I find it very sad that he has fallen on rough times and has had to leverage the equity of his accounts. Especially since it has turned into this..

Bruno is fucking epic.. Doesn't he have the most posts on this entire forum? I think so..


Bruno is no scammer.. It looks like he got screwed on the pump (effectively short)..
Sad, I don't think he has been able to catch much of the profits for a very long time iirc, and isn't overly well off..


Darkstar seems to understand he got screwed, another legend cares enough about personally him to buy him out of his debt when he can't, maybe he tried to sell the other account so he could pay the loan? Is that how it all went?

Fuck, I would have probably helped him out with a couple hundred $ BTC if I would have known... Just make a deal to rent out his avatars for him a bit for him until you get your BTC back..
The guy has some of the most valuable signature space on this forum..

Exactly, and thank you kindly, bud. I repaid the principle in full according to fiat but not according to BTC, thus assuring that DS wasn't out any real money (not meant as a diss toward crypto, of course).

Again, to be clear, hilariousetc's PRIVATE PM to me was sound, whereupon I immediately chilled, opting to post said sentiment publicly while quoting him, with apologies, again, for doing such.

I disagree with this part. I do think he did have an intention to pay the loan, but had issues with getting more money. The partial repayment he made was equal to $250, but the value of BTC had more than doubled.