Topic: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! - page 4. (Read 2248 times)

Hey, can I tag you for interfering with my scam?  


I'll go one better, buddy. See your trust thingy.  

Yep, I'm gonna to learnt to love the trust thingy.

You don't seem to get it. He clearly stated he isn't trusting you no matter who you are now. You don't need to convince anyone. Now start insulting me, it's been a while.

I tagged you the second time because you refused to read the first reference so I put the context into the feedback itself.


The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

Okay, it was suggested that I sign an address associated with me, but I replied that I don't think I can do that via blockchain.info where I've generated addressed for the past several years. He provided me this link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/signing-a-message-in-blockchaininfo-2534452.

Upon review, I think I can now accomplish said task. Please state which address you wish me to sign so that we can once and for all close this episode.

Bruno

I am powerless in this community, all I have is my voice. all I can do is to point out the wrongdoings of people, I have also said before that if don hilary tags me I wont complain, so I'm not going to post a thread about it however he has tagged me with his alt account after I posted a thread about marlboroza changing his email address after getting on DT2 so here is the case you wanted against him. also note that I got tagged because of you. after he posted to talk about Gleb's account has been sold or hacked I was encouraged and posted a thread to warn people that marlboroza account could've changed hands as well but since don hilary was the one who included marlboroza on DT2 he didn't like it and tagged me for trolling. now I'm waiting for marlboroza to reset his pass and changes his behavior to call him out on my accusation.

Let's not forget that suchmoon is still a trust abuser and the people in position of power should deal with her, she has no right to counter a valid negative trust, DT members might as well tag your account as an account seller, would suchmoon counter that as well?

Let me see if I understand this correctly. My YuTü.Co.in warrants negs due to what has or hasn't happened with my other accounts but suchmoon is forbidden from doing what he did in the same vein. How close am I?

Can I just put this one here?


Suchmoon is a trust abuser and is constantly misusing the trust system, she has also tagged me twice with one reference, she has also countered a negative trust for no valid reason. let DT1 members to keep suchmoon on their trust list because she leaves accurate feedbacks all the time, right?

Suchmoon first pays a loan on behalf of Gleb and then counters a negative feedback on Gleb's alt account to say that loan was paid, YuTü.Co.in account has done nothing to deserve a counter rating therefore suchmoon felt that since she paid the loan she has now the right to counter a valid negative trust.

Could you guys understand my sarcasm or do you need me to add a tag in front of every sarcastic line?

DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.

I'd like to suggest for a way out for Bruno, he is still a DT2 member and suchmoon needs to return his account so that he could start tagging ICO scammers, if Bruno has indeed busted many scams, then we could give him a chance to do it more effectively by tagging scammers this time. note to Bruno, if you get back your DT2 account you can't tag don hilary or do retaliatory tags, just tag them scammers sorry asses.

This ^^^ unfortunately, is a valid point.

Congratulations, you've proved that you can get Gage to take a picture of himself which we've already established that. Funny how these are never instantaneous and come hours into the debate. You have to wait for Gleb to wake up or something?


You really are an fool, aren't you? The real Gleb would have been able to tell me what the bans were for and you still can't. I'm not interested in your recent bans that whatever naive rando has taken over this account got banned for. I'm talking about the bans the real Gleb received, you know, the ones he would know about and you don't. Yet another nail in the coffin for me.

I'll give you a clue what one of them was for: You keep doing it in this thread hence why your post are getting deleted. 

And I'll say it again: read the rules, you know, the ones you we're previously banned multiple times for breaking.


Bingo, but this guy obviously isn't very smart is he? Gleb has always been a buffoon but he wasn't this dumb.


I'm surprised I'm seemingly the only one who feels this way. Like Gleb or not, it's been proven he will sell or loan his accounts out for a few hundred bucks. For what it's worth, I don't think the guy who tried to sell the accounts or the person controlling the op account now is actually the real gleb though, but they are obviously in cahoots. Maybe greed just got to him and he wanted some of that tasty ICO money idiots are all to eager to spurge on, but either way I don't trust any account he is associated with due to all of this.

That's a valid point, bud. I didn't think of that. Oh wait, if I am really Bruno, I would've known that. I think I've been banned a total of 5-6 times in total over the course of 7+ years on this forum. Another time I remember was multiple shit posting, so I read in Bruno's post history. 

Maybe that's why he's asking - to verify if YOU know if you're the real Bruno.

Is this not you essentially stating in your sales thread that selling an account effects credibility?
https://archive.is/Sk4PJ#selection-3023.0-2936.5

You also tell your potential buyers the accounts can be used for signature campaigns, so that "route" seems well known before you decided to sell. I can only imagine what changed your mind?  Regardless, you claim to have successfully sold 2 other accounts before deciding to go this other route...

I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice.

To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do.

Was just sent a PM which I'll reply here ...


How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

A couple of those bans I don't have a clue as to why I was banned. My recent ban pertained to this account for blasting PMs which I found on my own accord was a no-no, thus stopped the practiced but was banned ~2 weeks after the fact for the offense. Akin to stopping the practice of trying to sell my account for fear of what's happening now.

My first ban back in 2011 resulted in me founding the very first crypto-based charity - Bitcoin 100 - where not a single satoshi was misappropriated nor any of its Team members paid a single satoshi of their literally thousands of hours of work in advancing this space.

Again, my behavior was 100% civil when discussing this issue a few days ago assuming then that this episode was closed.

But now it has morphed into King Shit deleting my posts ...