Pages:
Author

Topic: "Last of the V8s" is filing fake scam reports - page 3. (Read 1058 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.
Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I don't know why you think it is a misinformation, but thats exactly what's stated by theymos, about the usage of trust.

In particular, in my view:
 - Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.
Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I am also really annoyed by his topic with basically wrong guidelines regarding tags, which he keeps bumping as if it was THE TRUTH.

Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/infographic-guide-on-possible-reasons-to-leave-a-veve-trust-feedbacks-5100675
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.
Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I was contemplating whether to act on this or not for a long time just like I did with bcash scammers. There you go.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
This should be moved to Reputation. It is a user-based issue and not that of the forum.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Although realr0ach, you aren't supposed to worry about every feedbacks you get, the trust system isn't moderated people will always take advantage of that but you should know, most feedbacks are worthless, they don't contribute to your trust score.

V8 is now DT2, so it does effect his score....However, given r0ach's current stance on crytocurrency, I don't see exactly how this would impede him at all. Unless he is hoping to use bitcointalk to construct a network of people white men willing to do face to face commerce involving silver and gold bullion.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Although realr0ach, you aren't supposed to worry about every feedbacks you get, the trust system isn't moderated people will always take advantage of that but you should know, most feedbacks are worthless, they don't contribute to your trust score.

V8 is now DT2, so it does effect his score.

Thanks for the information, I viewed his profile and didn't see a score could be because of my custom trust list.
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
And here's some evidence to prove my point:

Patently false. I sold no-where near ~$5,000 USD of the top. Sold as it was crashing down from the top, and I started panicking.

Nowhere near $5000 off the top you say?  There's a quote below of you selling $1 million worth at $14.5k.  You sold around $5 million worth from what I can tell altogther while posting bull spam the entire time telling everyone else to buy or "hodl".  By your own admission in the quotes below, you were telling everyone else to buy or "hodl" after you had already extracted "an obsecene amount of fiat".  If you actually believed the price was going higher or even believed bitcoin was a store of value at all, you would be buying instead of selling.  Instead, you were dumping like mad and then posting bull spam while doing it and afterwards. 

In chronological order:

Don't trust anyone

I'm totally fucked at Coinbase. Sitting on an obscene amount of fiat from a recent sale, but don't have access to my Funding/Withdrawal page.

Having one really fucking bad time trying to pull out lots of cash from Coinbase.

CHOO-CHOO TOWARDS $20K MOTHERFUCKERS !!!

Saddle up boys. Time to ride that bull !

BTC buying opportunity.

LOL.  Here's betting we're flirting with $18k by Friday.

Ok. Extracted just north of $1M @ $14,500 USD/BTC.

Once the wire hits my account, I'll load up for round 2.

Who SODL'd the bottom ?
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
This better suits in the Reputation section



I think this as a wrong way of using trust by the way. But trust system is not moderated and you would be at a better chance to remove the neg by PMing Last of the V8s

I personally think the negative trust is unwanted for such issues.
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
As I explained in the other thread:

LastoftheV8TrilemmaShills is now filing FALSE REPORTS against me.  Anyone who has been in this thread knows for a fact that Bob was telling everyone to "hodl" at the top near $20k while he was dumping instead.  I don't feel like digging up the posts now (but I can if Bob didn't go back and edit them).  There is absolutely nothing in that post that isn't true:




Pages:
Jump to: