Topic: Lauda gives abusive negative trust - page 2. (Read 1384 times)

goodluck. Perfect without any mistakes Lauda will not remove your red trust, it will hit his ego. Lauda known as the only perfect man living on earth. His egocentric mind will not let him show the soft side of himself. It violates his humanity existence.  

Your problem is with the Alttradex account, not with Lauda IMO. Yes I understand Lauda tagged you, but if the owner of the Alttradex account had been a responsible business owner and either A: paid a designer for signatures to be created or B: Asked Jayce for permission to use his design, this would not be an issue right now.

Instead, that person decided he can do whatever the fuck he wants. He can steal from anyone he wants without consequences. He will bad mouth anyone who wants to have a different opinion than what he believes. So for his actions Lauda decided he is a scammer/Untrustworthy user and anyone who does business or helps him will be labeled as such as well for promoting his scam.

His project may or may not be a scam. IMO that is not the issue here, but if the owner wants users to trust him then why do shady shit? This IMO makes me believe hes a shady guy as well. I don't mind his retaliatory feedback he left for me and everyone else, just proves more and more that we are correct. This dude has no clue how to handle things responsibly so why do you believe he would operate a business any different?

You say you are being bullied but that's not the case here at all. You were given an ultimatum. Remove the sig or get some paint. You CHOSE the latter.

We are judging your claim to be without merit.  You just don't like the results. 

Shows how ignorant you are. Lauda is not an admin and has never been a forum admin... unless you conform to the ridiculous idea that Lauda = Lutpin = satoshi = theymos

Trust can be sent for any reason at all. It is completely at the discretion of the users that send it... Like how you, for example, sent a retaliatory feedback.

The rule? Common fucking sense.

You don't seem like the type.

I have got 16 negative abusive trust...
you can do nothing against...the more you try to talk about,the more you get red trust.

Why do you have this "Reputation" thread if there is no one who can judge if a OP abused his power or not?

I always fallow the rules, but I think that is unprofessional for a forum admin to abuse his power when he doesn't have a forum rule to back his action. In this case, no one showed me any link to a forum rules, that I broke to deserve the negative trust.

Like I said before, share with me the rule that I'm not allowed to have someone's signature, and please show me all the signatures that I'm not allowed to have.

You can not invent rules just because they serve your interest! The rules are for everyone, and admins should enforce them, so show me the rules that I've broke, please, and as obedient citizen that I am I will fallow.

Thanks

You sound like him. The biggest problem here is his lack of professionalism about how to handle a problem. You know, I have made few complains on some companies before, but none of them who responding me like a trash. Well its up to you if you believe in him and the project. Good luck then.

I'd like to PM if you will unblock me that would be nice,
Is clearly that you and Alttradex have something to resolve, but I've modify the signature.
Please watch it and let's move on.

After I finished downloading my thoughts into this thread I realized that nothing good will come out of it, so I modified the signature. (That is me saying "I'm sorry" and let's get along)

Please see my signature and tell me if it's alright.
If it is please remove my negative trust because I never intended to steel anything or to do anything bad.

You can say many things about me, but you never can tell me that I don't fallow the rules.

You are a liar, along with the account of that project (whoever is behind it).

You were explicitly warned, just like everyone else which was a rather very polite thing to do. Usually I do not give any kind of warning before leaving a rating.

OMG, just delete it and wait till this has been resolved. That project is probably a scam project, and it's not good to be supporting them.

So,
I've made some changes to signature.
Is this signature still owned by anyone?

Ponzi and a signature is not the same thing. The Alttradex is a good project, like I said, only problem is with this signature.
I really don't understand how a signature structure could be owned by someone.

If you own color ferrari red which is: #ff2800 and if I want to use #ff2800 I have to ask you for permission, but if I have #ff2802 that is no more ferrari red, it's another color that you don't own. That's how pattern work in real life. In this case I really don't think that Alttradex (if he used other person's signature), is identical with the other one.
I really really really can not believe that. It has to have another color, it has many more letters, is has a different content, it has different structure.

MAYBE you can say that they look the same, like ferrari red #ff2800 and my #ff2802 color, but in reality they are very different.

I really don't know what to say more, if you want to be friends with Lauda, that's fine, but at least see the logic in what I'm saying... and you will see that this is a abuse!

I bought ETHD with paypal, and wasn't great because I didn't make any money out of it but this is not the same problem. The Alttradex is a good project and I really think that it will be a great success, you will see... anyway, the only problem is this stupid signature, which I think that Alttradex will modify it and everyone will go one with their life.
I really believe that Lauda abused his/her power on me, and if you can not see it, I'd like for you to be in my place, and I think that things would be different,

I've been OP on other forums and I know a little bit how things work, and that's why, like I said before, I really don't think that any of the OPs will take my side... Lauda is OP, your OP, he's/she's Legendary... I will not have any OP who will defend me, I'm sure of that, but out of principle, YOU CAN NOT ABUSE YOUR POWER ON SOMEONE WHO IS DOING A SERVICE FOR SOMEONE ELSE. Take it on the other one, and leave me alone.

Anyway, waiting for the OP who thinks that I'm right... and still waiting

Sounds like you were advertising something sketchy. Why would anyone trust that? If you asked to buy Bitcoin with PayPal and got neg bombed I'd consider that the same basic problem. You can't just advertise for a scam then expect everyone to go along with it. Hope the pay was worth it lol. Time to start a new account.

After a dumbass rant like this you'll never get rid of your neg trust.

P.S.

I have never gave up in front of a BULLY, and I will not start now. Like I said before: This is the definition of bullying!

I will remove it as soon Alttradex will have a new signature.
When he has it, I will change it.

I thought from the start that Lauda will not be blamed for abuse... anyway... I had to see it to believe it.

I really hope that someday something similar will happen to you and you will see how unfair all is.

Hmmm,
How can I say that it will make sense to everyone... Let's say that a shop is selling candy near you and when they opened their shop there was no "advertisement claims" by any other shop, and the shop tells you that if you advertise in their name you will get some candy, and you agree.
After a long time someone comes to the shop and tell them that they have to change their advertise or they will be in trouble. You can see that MAYBE the others might be right, but you don't know for sure, and if you drop out of your partnership with the shop you will lose all the candy that you earned. What do you do, drop out, or you continue and after the shops finish their arguments and one of them changes the advertise, you change yours?

Because in this case - in a real life incident like that - the shops have to agree on that advertise, and after you change it or not change it, because you have a contract with one of the shops, and you can not be blamed for going on with your contract.

I can give you some names of big shops from US and EU and the contractors never have been held responsible for a misconduct of any of the shops.

In this case I can not be blamed for something that I'm doing wrong. I only respect my contract, until the advertise changes, and when it will change I will change mine. Until then I can not be blamed for it because I use it in Alttradex name, is not my signature, I don't own it, Alttradex does.

If you still don't understand my side of the argument, it's really late, I will think about another example tomorrow, maybe you will see that I'm right, I'm always right.(ioke)

You STILL have not removed the signature.. before than don't even ask for anything.

So you will support plagiarism purely because you don't want to lose money?

---

Will you also support a ponzi if some signature campaign is revealed to be one, even though you're participating in it?

I feel like you have a skewed sense of justice.