Lauda offered multi-signature escrow with accounts controlled by him.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: Alert guy on June 06, 2017, 03:15:44 AM

@Lauda and @DT Members , i will suggest you not to leave these puppets what i believe is that these accounts are sold and are in possession of the scammer who opens a ANN thread and then start self vouches and bump from time to time gets few investors and then shut down the hosting and domain.

Without reasonable proof, I can't just leave negative ratings to users even though there is adequate circumstantial evidence. The staff team itself is doing almost nothing to combat this sock puppetry, which in returns sets a bad precedence for the Bitcoin ecosystem. Imagine how nice it would be, if we were to prevent/combat >90% of the scams around here?

Quote from: Alert guy on June 06, 2017, 03:15:44 AM

I have full Dox of the scammer , his country , IP , the mobile he uses etc..

That put aside, if you have reasonable proof that this is the user, then create a thread in this section: Investigations. You are allowed to post his DOX there for the sake of investigating.

Alert guy

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 2

@Lauda and @DT Members , i will suggest you not to leave these puppets what i believe is that these accounts are sold and are in possession of the scammer who opens a ANN thread and then start self vouches and bump from time to time gets few investors and then shut down the hosting and domain.

I have full Dox of the scammer , his country , IP , the mobile he uses etc..

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: stripykitteh link=topic=19474javascript:void(0);47.msg19386872#msg19386872 date=1496706513

I just found the negative feedback thing out by reading the last page of the ANN thread. I changed my signature and avatar. I signed up in their signature campaign a few days ago because they looked legit, I am not so sure now.

There is absolutely no reason to post in this thread. PM me if you need me.

Quote from: stripykitteh link=topic=19474javascript:void(0);47.msg19386872#msg19386872 date=1496706513

Is it possible to have the negative trust removed?

Done.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: HongKong on June 05, 2017, 04:26:16 PM

Is this thread the warning that you are writing about?

No.

Quote from: HongKong on June 05, 2017, 04:26:16 PM

And what happens if LNK launches successfully and everyone who invested gets their coins?

You seem to be uneducated. Launching a token is extremely simple, there are even semi-automated tools. I could probably create a "Link 2.0" token in a few hours using such tools(disclaimer: I have never attempted that).

Quote from: HongKong on June 05, 2017, 04:26:16 PM

Will the neg. trust from you be removed? Because this thread just seems that it's only about the Escrow..

No and no.

HongKong

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 500

I notice that you gave me neg. feedback for enrolling in the LNK campaign, I removed my sig + avatar. Is this thread the warning that you are writing about?

And what happens if LNK launches successfully and everyone who invested gets their coins? Will the neg. trust from you be removed? Because this thread just seems that it's only about the Escrow..

Thanks.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: ?? on ??

All these shills defending lauda are just pathetic.

The only pathetic thing here is you, and your scam project snowflake. Kiss

minifrij

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1267

In Memory of Zepher

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yeah, now logout and come back with your next account and talk to yourself like you do.
All these shills defending lauda are just pathetic.

Are you usually allowed on the internet without your carer? Should you not tell them before you log on?

SaShiRaJaVu

hero member

Activity: 1694

Merit: 541

Some people here have bloody sense of humor but it is time to change the memes @Timelord2067 and @ Lauda ,i am seeing that too many times which makes me bored ,i usually view all the drama here and usually prefer to watch than to scribble something,just wrote this to inform TLord and Lauda Tongue

and since this accusation wont reach anywhere since OP has nothing else to say and for the first time i have seen a bitcointalk consensus from all the users regarding this accusation . Cheesy

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

cpfreeplz

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1042

All this would make a lot of sense and everyone would totally stand up for you. The one tiny issue is the fact that these are two separate people until you've proved otherwise. Why do you think they are alts? Them posting similarly isn't proof. I saw a man with a black baseball cap and a red truck murder a lady. If someone matches that description it doesn't make them a murderer.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

I highly doubt Lauda offered to pull a Quickseller-type "self-escrow" scam, since I do believe Lauda has railed against QS doing so in the past. I'd never heard that term "self-escrow" before viewing bitcointalk in all its glory. And for good reason. There's no such thing. It's synonymous with "scam", and Lauda hasn't done anything of the sort (that extortion thing has been grossly taken out of context).

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Qartada

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: minifrij on June 03, 2017, 04:34:35 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on June 03, 2017, 02:02:00 PM

snip

What do you say to the accusations that yourself and Lauda are one and the same?

Quote from: ?? on ??

...and probably quickseller as he has the same post history and behavior.

I wouldn't call it an "accusation"; more like "the demented ramblings of a broken scammer".

If we're basing our accusations on "post history and behaviour", then I suppose Deja is an alt of kiklo.

Clearly it's pretty normal activity to back out an escrow deal and accuse the escrows of being scammers rather than getting someone they believe is reliable to escrow instead. That really makes me feel good about the Ethereum.link project.

I suppose while Deja is proving his legitimacy he'll go ahead and post Ethereum.link's public ICO address?

minifrij

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1267

In Memory of Zepher

Quote from: Quickseller on June 03, 2017, 02:02:00 PM

snip

What do you say to the accusations that yourself and Lauda are one and the same?

Quote from: ?? on ??

...and probably quickseller as he has the same post history and behavior.

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: Deja on June 03, 2017, 11:37:49 AM

Hello community,

I want to write this to state how 'Escrow services' from Lauda work,

In the start of Ethereum Link ICO, we approached Lauda Escrow services by a proxy friend, Escrow included: Lauda, MinerJones and Yahoo,

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lauda-101872
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/minerjones-346731

I confirm yahoo is not an alt of Lauda, because my friend knows him before he was given any green trust on its profile.

We noticed so much red flags on their service and refused it.
He felt humillited for this simple action and started to look back on our project.

After several days on our ico running, Lauda alt, aka Ibminer https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ibminer-84866 tagged our profile with the first neg trust, then minutes later it was tagged by this shady user main account aka Lauda, then by minerjones

Now seeing their tags was doing nothing on Link topic and project, he got angry and started to post negative trust on signature participants like this account: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/generous-709913

What power does he believe he has just because he got angry by users realizing all my trust was given by the same person?

He offered multi-signature escrow with 2 accounts controlled by him and offering no additional layer of trust except for Yahoo, but as it was going to be 2 out of 3 multi signature escrow, he could had stole all funds by himself and dissapear.

Is that allowed ?

Quote from: Deja on June 03, 2017, 11:50:04 AM

He himself accepted this:

Will post ip details soon

As I stated in your conveniently cropped photo, ibminer != Lauda

Would you like to display the rest of our conversation and the attempts to bribe me to remove the feedback? ... instead of just proving the validity of this ICO. Huh

I have nothing to do with Lauda's escrow service, and if you want to use another escrow, you have other options. Regardless, you should be able to prove you're holding the funds that you claim you are holding, which is now apparently over 1.2M USD. You've stated in your thread that you would prove the funds collected but I'm not seeing any attempts or effort to do this.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

I don't think they are all the same person.

I would avoid using "multi-sig" escrow in which one of the escrow agents picks the other two escrow agents, as this is an indication that each of the escrow agents are connected. In this case, each of the escrows that wanted to be a signer are very close to each-other.

I would absolutely not use Lauda as an escrow, nor would I trust him in any way as he is an extortionist.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: ?? on ??

So, you are impliying Theymos works with Lauda?

No, they only know how the trust system works and you seem not to.

Quote from: Quickseller on June 03, 2017, 02:02:00 PM

I would absolutely not use Lauda as an escrow, nor would I trust him in any way as he is an extortionist.

Way to talk about your alt account, QS.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: Deja on June 03, 2017, 12:08:56 PM

Yes, more obvious it cannot be. Cheesy

- Another one, -Ibminer- has default trust by doing nothing.

Perhaps you'd like to ring it up with theymos then since he added ibminer to his trust list.

You should also stop double-posting.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Just see your own autistic post history and quickseller ones.

When you start to post memes is because you are nervous.

You know, now that you're attacking Lauda your post history looks a lot like the post history of butthurt scammers! Certainly, you must be an alt! Roll Eyes

Deja

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

Silverlink

Quote from: Lutpin on June 03, 2017, 12:05:50 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Just see your own autistic post history and quickseller ones.

I like the part where Lauda calls QS an escrow scammer and the one where QS calls Lauda an extortionist.
That's a nice little theatre for two accounts being controlled by the same person.

Do you have more bedtime stories to tell? This is starting to get entertaining.
Maybe something with dragons. Oh and queens. Tell me a story, please.

Yes, more obvious it cannot be. Cheesy

- Another one, -Ibminer- has default trust by doing nothing.

Deja

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

Silverlink

Quote from: Lauda on June 03, 2017, 12:04:35 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Just see your own autistic post history and quickseller ones.

Quote from: ?? on ??

When you start to post memes is because you are nervous.

That was not a meme.

Quote from: Deja on June 03, 2017, 12:00:08 PM

When he first gave the neg reps he immetiately told me this after we told him to not use alt accounts.

Your claims were absurd then, just as they are absurd now. I'm waiting for your proof non-autistic snowflake. Kiss

Why are you tagging signature campaign participants just because we refused your escrow? some participants don't have even seen main topic besides the signature one.

Topic: Lauda offered multi-signature escrow with accounts controlled by him. (Read 1814 times)