Topic: Lauda offered multi-signature escrow with accounts controlled by him. - page 2. (Read 1804 times)

I like the part where Lauda calls QS an escrow scammer and the one where QS calls Lauda an extortionist.
That's a nice little theatre for two accounts being controlled by the same person.

Do you have more bedtime stories to tell? This is starting to get entertaining.
Maybe something with dragons. Oh and queens. Tell me a story, please.

That was not a meme.

Your claims were absurd then, just as they are absurd now. I'm waiting for your proof non-autistic snowflake.

When he first gave the neg reps he immetiately told me this after we told him to not use alt accounts.

Lauda == Quickseller? This is genius! I can't wait for you to provide proof.

Hey, leave my good name out of this.
Oh wait, nevermind. OP go make yourself a clown once again by including me and zepher in this.
You think that's going to help your project? Behaving like this? People probably will lose confidence in your abilities pretty soon.

!= means "is not". Look it up before saying stupid stuff in public.
Here, in case you do not know how to use google:
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/22336/what-is-the-origin-of-in-the-meaning-not-equal-to

He himself accepted this:





Will post ip details soon

OP is an idiot. I would have labeled them with a nice description, but I try to avoid using *bad words*. We rejected their escrow proposal, which was that they control all addresses and forward to multisig. I was contemplating on tagging them at the time, but did not due to potential bias. Only after a scam accusation appeared, and ibminer reviewed && asked questions which got censored have they received a negative rating.

---

This was based on his review of the situation, or should I say.. mine?

Hey, so the only proof you have of linking the "alts" together is the fact that they negged an account, one after another? There's no sense in making that linkage.

Are you also going to say that Zepher is an alt? How about Lutpin?

---

---

If you have more red flags, will you post them instead of keeping them hidden like an idiot flailing around on his keyboard without any sense? Otherwise, you're simply bullshitting and you're wasting everybody's time.

Red flags? You mean, your outright refusal to use addresses controlled by the escrows and your insisture for using your own addresses? In other words, our participation as *escrows* would have provided no security of anything whatsoever.

Proof? If you have no proof, then this is clear defamation.

---

Clear description of yourself, a blackmailer, and your project:

Hello community,

I want to write this to state how 'Escrow services' from Lauda work,

In the start of Ethereum Link ICO, we approached Lauda Escrow services by a proxy friend, Escrow included: Lauda, MinerJones and Yahoo,

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lauda-101872
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/minerjones-346731

I may assure yahoo is not an alt of Lauda, because my friend knows him before he was given any green trust on his profile and also, Yahoo left the Escrow deal by his own before we refused.

We noticed many red flags in their service and refused it.
He felt humillited for this simple action and started to look back at our project.

After several days  after the start of our ICO, Lauda alt aka Ibminer https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ibminer-84866 tagged our profile with the first red trust then minutes later it was tagged by his main account aka Lauda, then by minerjones

After this and seeing their tags was doing nothing on Link topic and project, he got angry and started to post negative trust to signature participants like this account: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/generous-709913

What power does he believe he has just because he got angry seing users realized all my trust from my profile was given by the same person?

He offered multi-signature escrow with 2 accounts controlled by him thus offering no additional layer of trust except for Yahoo, but as it was going to be 2 out of 3 multi signature escrow, he could have stolen all funds by himself and dissapear.


Is that allowed?