Topic: Lauda/aTriz possible alts of each other [Merit Abuse] (Read 967 times)
I don't think they're alts. It'll be a big problem if aTriZ gives big amount of Merit for a lower rank account then all you guys can confirm that they are alts but with Lauda, a legendary member, I don't think Lauda need these amount of Merit to increase account rank. Beside I think with all the things Lauda did in this forum, he deserves it
If you are an Escrow scammer, you have zero integrity, this also applies to known extortionists, BTCtalk negative rating abusers, and merit abusers.
You do not get a special pass privilege, through time served, or previous titles.
Definition of scam;
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation.
Enough said.
You do not get a special pass privilege, through time served, or previous titles.
Definition of scam;
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation.
Enough said.
Unfortunatly lauda does not have any intregrity.
Escrow scammers definitely do, and are in a position to judge other people's integrity. 
Because these guys have integrity, something that cannot be said about you.. neither of these guys would sell merit so this thread is a non starter. People who know aTriz and Lauda will stand up for them as they are above such actions, I am sure the same would happen for me if you made a similar thread actually the same for anyone who is posting in Lauda or aTriz's defence.
Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..
Peace out
Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..
Peace out
I suggest you do the same and then start acting as it is defined. Tagging members against proof with red trust or tagging members for actions that the tagger is performing himself is not integrity but hypocricy and scam.
Because these guys have integrity, something that cannot be said about you.. neither of these guys would sell merit so this thread is a non starter. People who know aTriz and Lauda will stand up for them as they are above such actions, I am sure the same would happen for me if you made a similar thread actually the same for anyone who is posting in Lauda or aTriz's defence.
Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..
Peace out
Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..
Peace out
I suggest you do the same and then start acting as it is defined. Tagging members against proof with red trust or tagging members for actions that the tagger is performing himself is not integrity but hypocricy and scam.
Lauda deserves a lot more than 50 merits imo, I'm not bothered to go through every post and merit them, so I just picked one.
That is not even the point. The point is that others are tagged red for the above but not Lauda and you!
Because these guys have integrity, something that cannot be said about you.. neither of these guys would sell merit so this thread is a non starter. People who know aTriz and Lauda will stand up for them as they are above such actions, I am sure the same would happen for me if you made a similar thread actually the same for anyone who is posting in Lauda or aTriz's defence.
Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..
Peace out
Lauda deserves a lot more than 50 merits imo, I'm not bothered to go through every post and merit them, so I just picked one.
That is not even the point. The point is that others are tagged red for the above but not Lauda and you!
How many Lauda wanks have you had today OP??
I have nothing against him, really, i really dont care that he gave me a neg, I am really good with it. I just feel soo sad and pitty for him, for his ego. I wish she could have a better meaningful life. May god bless him.If you don't care why make this thread? Don't you see the contradiction
How many Lauda wanks have you had today OP??
I have nothing against him, really, i really dont care that he gave me a neg, I am really good with it. I just feel soo sad and pitty for him, for his ego. I wish she could have a better meaningful life. May god bless him.If you don't care why make this thread? Don't you see the contradiction
How many Lauda wanks have you had today OP??
I have nothing against him, really, i really dont care that he gave me a neg, I am really good with it. I just feel soo sad and pitty for him, for his ego. I wish she could have a better meaningful life. May god bless him.
How many Lauda wanks have you had today OP??
Lauda's lap-dogs quickly joined that thread trying to discredit it ?
4 people on that thread who are Lauda's lap-dogs.
Biggest abuser on this messageboard.
Just have a look at history of Trust and Merit from Lauda and you will see there is a circle of always the same people giving themself trust and merit.
These are the exect same people who are defending Lauda.
4 people on that thread who are Lauda's lap-dogs.
Biggest abuser on this messageboard.
Just have a look at history of Trust and Merit from Lauda and you will see there is a circle of always the same people giving themself trust and merit.
These are the exect same people who are defending Lauda.
Every single time Lauda is mentioned those 4 summon instantly to gently stroke the ego that’s amassed.
Admins are blatantly complicit allowing them to continue this rampage of negitive trust.
Read the forum rules to idiots, leaving negitive trust because of “low quality posts” is abusing the trust system.
Unless you have valid evidence of scam accusations, I’d suggest not sending future negitive trust, it’s just making you Lauda look like a pathetic child who thinks he is the bitcointalk police.
Lauda will singlehandely destroy this forum, now people will no longer use or trust the trust rating displayed on profiles, leading to users being scammed, ripped off and more.
Users are already editing their default trust to remove those abusing the system, this will result in all your work going completely unnoticed by the larger community.
in my opinion, everyone has every right to give merit to anyone, if indeed it makes the information that is needed to be given what merit is also the right of each member.
In my opinion, the actions of lauda so far is very helpful to crack down on unfavorable members, be it a member of a scam or another.
She is helpful so he can abuse anything and everything? What he says is the truth and if he says that he can give it anyone then its valid, but when people want to give it to someone who they know / who can give them back then its not acceptable. In my opinion, the actions of lauda so far is very helpful to crack down on unfavorable members, be it a member of a scam or another.
What if people who got neg for exchanging merits were best high school friends who were sitting together and exchanging merits because its their right to give it to anyone?
Now where are all the DT2 members who bite normal users when they exchange merits and hold hands of people like Lauda who are obviously holding and conserving their merits amongst their alts / knowns.
in my opinion, everyone has every right to give merit to anyone, if indeed it makes the information that is needed to be given what merit is also the right of each member.
In my opinion, the actions of lauda so far is very helpful to crack down on unfavorable members, be it a member of a scam or another.
In my opinion, the actions of lauda so far is very helpful to crack down on unfavorable members, be it a member of a scam or another.
Lauda's lap-dogs quickly joined that thread trying to discredit it ?
4 people on that thread who are Lauda's lap-dogs.
Biggest abuser on this messageboard.
Just have a look at history of Trust and Merit from Lauda and you will see there is a circle of always the same people giving themself trust and merit.
These are the exect same people who are defending Lauda.
4 people on that thread who are Lauda's lap-dogs.
Biggest abuser on this messageboard.
Just have a look at history of Trust and Merit from Lauda and you will see there is a circle of always the same people giving themself trust and merit.
These are the exect same people who are defending Lauda.
I am not sure they are alts, however they are making a mockery of the trust (and merit) system.
How so? As far as I see it, you are free to do what you want. It's your merit for a reason.
Perhaps you missed the part in the OP that I was referring to:
Lately with the merit system coming out,[...] actmyname , have started giving red trust to people for sending merit to each other's account for reasons like : "Merit was sent literally minutes apart for inconsequential posts."
I'm still confused af. Atriz and Lauda work together, and they haven't given out insane amounts of merit, so what's the big deal? Mind I say Lauda hasn't even given trust to Atriz, so your logic of making a mockery doesn't help your argument.
Furthermore, what actmyname is pointing out is merits being given out to alt accounts, not "random people". If you don't like what he is doing, create a thread about it and debate his negative trust.
Atriz & Lauda IMO are not the same people, and here I quote Atriz to sum this up again:
Lauda deserves a lot more than 50 merits imo, I'm not bothered to go through every post and merit them, so I just picked one.
I am not sure they are alts, however they are making a mockery of the trust (and merit) system.
How so? As far as I see it, you are free to do what you want. It's your merit for a reason.
Perhaps you missed the part in the OP that I was referring to:
Lately with the merit system coming out,[...] actmyname , have started giving red trust to people for sending merit to each other's account for reasons like : "Merit was sent literally minutes apart for inconsequential posts."
In other words: A busted troll still can't accept reality.
My background? I was tagged because of a simple mistake by sending a message. It's ok I've accepted it since I learned it was against the rules. I've explained and apologized for my action. At least I do not have extortion in my background as you do. I will follow your advice and try to convince a DT member I am trusteable, or whatever.Calling someone butthurt is not reason to give 50 merits.
What you think is a reason for giving merit is completely irrelevant and actually worthless given your background. If I want to maximize the amount of merit I give on a insulting post, I will. It is my choice, and any reason I see fit for my sMerit is a valid reason to give it. This is not the Default Trust system where you have to pay attention to what you're doing. You're allowed to do anything (when you're not a Source) with sMerit other than sell/farm it with your alts.I feel sad for others who were tagged for sending trust to each other's account in few minutes.
Either their neg should be removed or Lauda should get one too.
Its just sad how some DT2 members get away with everything because of misuse of their powers
In other words: A busted troll still can't accept reality.
My background? I was tagged because of a simple mistake by sending a message. It's ok I've accepted it since I learned it was against the rules. I've explained and apologized for my action. At least I do not have extortion in my background as you do. I will follow your advice and try to convince a DT member I am trusteable, or whatever. Calling someone butthurt is not reason to give 50 merits.
What you think is a reason for giving merit is completely irrelevant and actually worthless given your background. If I want to maximize the amount of merit I give on a insulting post, I will. It is my choice, and any reason I see fit for my sMerit is a valid reason to give it. This is not the Default Trust system where you have to pay attention to what you're doing. You're allowed to do anything (when you're not a Source) with sMerit other than sell/farm it with your alts.
In other words: A busted troll still can't accept reality.
Calling someone butthurt is not reason to give 50 merits.
What you think is a reason for giving merit is completely irrelevant and actually worthless given your background. If I want to maximize the amount of merit I give on a insulting post, I will. It is my choice, and any reason I see fit for my sMerit is a valid reason to give it. This is not the Default Trust system where you have to pay attention to what you're doing. You're allowed to do anything (when you're not a Source) with sMerit other than sell/farm it with your alts. Jump to: