So, Ohio goes to Kasich. Trump gets Florida which is no surprise. The non-winner-takes-all states look mostly ho-hum for Trump.
The big news to me is that the Replublican establishment is thinking about a third-party. The goal would be to split the vote and get Hillary in. The options from here seem to be that Trump wins the primaries outright and the Republicans cut his legs out, or they do a brokered where both Trump and Cruz get hosed.
On the Democrat side, Bernie 'felt the burn' again by having the Soros funded hooligans who broke up Trump's rally blamed on him while Clinton smiles all the way to a blow-out in most or all of the states on the block today.
It should be abundantly clear that 2016 is Establishment Globalists vs. Americans. Here is the strategy I would suggest to overcome the odds.
- Trump tells the Repubican party to fuck themselves whether he wins the nomination outright or not.
- Forms a third-party himself.
- Enlists both Sanders and Cruz if possible. They are both going to have establishment tire-tracks on their carcasses anyway. And both are probably closer to Americans than they are to Globalists.
That's interesting, but I don't see Trump and Sanders teaming up. Maybe Trump and Cruz. I also don't see Trump wanting to be second on a ticket. I could even see Sanders running as an independent separately from Trump to make it a 4-way race.
Firstly, Trump would not be 2nd on the ticket. Sanders would never win so it would be futile. Not enough communist indoctrination yet...give it 4 more years though...
There may not be as much difference between Trump and Sanders as some people think. Consider:
- Trump once suggested paying off the national debt by a one-time tax on the super-rich (e.g., himself.)
- Trump has said in no uncertain terms that nobody will go without health care no matter what.
- Less than 10 years ago Sanders was anti-immigration to the point where he didn't even welcome guest-workers, much less illegals. That is to the right of Trump's supposedly outrageous stance on the subject and says something about his basic preference for American citizens.
- Most pinko's of today are empowered by the one-worlders (e.g., Soros) who are jacking them off for political convenience. (Edit: Their end goal is a corporate owned one-world Technocracy.) Sanders was a pinko before that dynamic was strong. Thus, he might well be a 'real' socialist which is not mutually exclusive with being an American.
What the globalists are trying to do is to 'synchronize' all regions of the world so that they will mesh. This means transferring middle-class American wealth to the developing world. This achieves three goals:
- Bringing the US mean down
- Bringing the desperately poor in other areas up.
- Bringing society to a state of hive-mind worker bees who are happy in their 'mega-region' honeycomb with a few controllers at the top. Middle-class is empowered by their wealth and thus threaten the hive structure and must go.
Obama has been focused on the above agenda and quite successful. 'free trade' is the biggest tool in the toolbox. I believe that Trump understands this dynamic and the statements he makes reflect this. Sanders may be able to see the trap before it's to late and may not be on-board if he does. As I say, his 'socialist' views would probably be better served under Trump's plan than under the one-worlder's thumb. I would not know of course.
Both of them dont give a fuck. 
