Sorry dude, I'd love to but you'd have to put the payout up first. I removed all the faucets with payouts that low today, and will likely be more brutal in the days ahead once I add more.
On a general note, it's becoming apparent I'm not going to get away from putting in reporting in the near term. There are faucets which are broken or a pain in the ass in the splitscreen rotator, ones running dry too often, and others just outright breaking (I use the site myself under the same rules as everybody else - best way to see how it performs and how I can improve it) so I'll be adding in functionality for people to report these things or add ones they just plain find annoying to an ignore list over the next few days - I'm thinking I'll also add a way for people to advise where buttons are etc on the more sneaky ones, but that's probably a job for next week. Maintaining the list is probably going to be too time consuming and I'd like for owners like evilfaucet here to be able to add their own faucets whenever they want (subject to admin approval, obviously) so I'll be building that in as a priority this week.
In terms of actual development (rather than just planned) I bought some adwords credit to bring some complete randoms in and see how they fared. The few that turned up didn't do great, they seemed to click on a bunch of links which didn't work because they weren't logged in, and just left. That is clearly no bueno so I tweaked things a little. Now, rather than simply telling them to log in to visit the faucets, I've made it so that logged out randoms are presented with a list that takes them direct to the faucets they click on rather than trying to send them via the redirect. The referral addresses in the list are generated based on randomly selected users who have been active in the past 24 hours. So even if someone finds the site through a search and for some unknown reason wants to browse the faucets without logging in (which is just flat out insane IMO) I just let them. It's their loss, but as long as referrals are being generated for the active users I'm fine with that.
The only problem with this is that it's still a half measure - they can click the links and get where they're going, but there's no indication afterwards of how long they need to wait per faucet, and they still need to be logged in to use the rotator (purely because there's no tracking - if I don't track them and don't know how long they have to wait, then I can't make the faucets come up in a sane order, according to wait etc)
In other news, I changed the order of the list. At some point in the near future I'll introduce sorting on user preference, but for now it's ordered from highest paying downwards. I still think random was a good idea in theory (the main point in this is to get as many *referrals* as possible for everybody, and that won't happen if everybody just cherry-picks the faucets offering high rewards) but let's face it, people want the quick win, and if I'm taking out the low paying faucets hopefully people will make it far enough through the list without turning away that it won't matter much. This new sorting applies to both the list and the rotators.
So the state of play as it stands is that there are a bunch of a pain in the ass faucets that need fixed - but these are a pain in the ass in different ways so I intend to come up with a workable solution to this in the next few days, and finding and adding faucets manually is so time consuming that it has to be shelved to allow development work to happen and vice versa, so coming up with good solutions to these two problems are very, very high up my to do list.
The site's also not nearly busy enough for my tastes yet. There are only a handful of people coming in on any given day, and even less who are sticking around and putting in work, so if you're one of the few who are using it frequently and you're disappointed with the results all I can say is thank you and please be patient in these early days. Once the traffic picks up the early adopters are going to be best positioned to reap badass rewards. It's designed to all balance out and be as fair as possible eventually, but in the early days when traffic starts picking up and we begin sending more people out to the faucets, it's going to be the people who got their foot in the door early and stayed active who are going to see the fastest growth in their incoming referral payments.
I think the referral sharing idea is a winner for everybody involved, and I'm determined to do a good job of this and make everyone a bunch more money than they'd otherwise get. Thanks for reading. I'll keep updating the thread as I continue to progress along my (slightly wing-it-as-you-go-along) develoment roadmap