Topic: Liqui admits to scam (Read 2551 times)
Yes that day I really needed this 10$ very badly, you may think I joked but no i did not joke, I did send him over 15 pm's before and was friendly to ask where is my payment, he just not replied, only after this I was aggressive, I know this is not acceptable but still he did scam me 11$ as he did not pay me
This user (Zoomer) failed to comply with signature campany terms:
He changed signature without any notice, however he was paid for first week -https://blockchain.info/tx/a6684e89c0e828ea5e6c15e07c74b05f4f5ba2ccd8ab65f83fc7fd860ecc7add.
We have some issues with crypto servers, we notice all participants in our thread about this. Only one part of them have problems with seeing their balances. After that he begin trolling and threaten in all channels - Liqui's chat, support email, this forum (give my money immediately, i need them to buy some food
etc.). After that he was banned from Liqui according to our ToS.
We don't want to have any contact with this trol again.
Good luck funny Zoomer.
Quote
4. Signature code must remain in place for the entire duration of your participation in the campaign. No other signature code / advertising allowed in your signature while you are participating in this campaign.
He changed signature without any notice, however he was paid for first week -https://blockchain.info/tx/a6684e89c0e828ea5e6c15e07c74b05f4f5ba2ccd8ab65f83fc7fd860ecc7add.
We have some issues with crypto servers, we notice all participants in our thread about this. Only one part of them have problems with seeing their balances. After that he begin trolling and threaten in all channels - Liqui's chat, support email, this forum (give my money immediately, i need them to buy some food
etc.). After that he was banned from Liqui according to our ToS.We don't want to have any contact with this trol again.
Good luck funny Zoomer.
I changed AFTER 1 week, do the first week should be paid
but you still deserve to get paid because you just fulfill the first week requirement and liquid are now obligated to do this
and by the way,are you really in need of foods?
This user (Zoomer) failed to comply with signature campany terms:
He changed signature without any notice, however he was paid for first week -https://blockchain.info/tx/a6684e89c0e828ea5e6c15e07c74b05f4f5ba2ccd8ab65f83fc7fd860ecc7add.
We have some issues with crypto servers, we notice all participants in our thread about this. Only one part of them have problems with seeing their balances. After that he begin trolling and threaten in all channels - Liqui's chat, support email, this forum (give my money immediately, i need them to buy some food etc.). After that he was banned from Liqui according to our ToS.
We don't want to have any contact with this trol again.
Good luck funny Zoomer.
Quote
4. Signature code must remain in place for the entire duration of your participation in the campaign. No other signature code / advertising allowed in your signature while you are participating in this campaign.
He changed signature without any notice, however he was paid for first week -https://blockchain.info/tx/a6684e89c0e828ea5e6c15e07c74b05f4f5ba2ccd8ab65f83fc7fd860ecc7add.
We have some issues with crypto servers, we notice all participants in our thread about this. Only one part of them have problems with seeing their balances. After that he begin trolling and threaten in all channels - Liqui's chat, support email, this forum (give my money immediately, i need them to buy some food
etc.). After that he was banned from Liqui according to our ToS.We don't want to have any contact with this trol again.
Good luck funny Zoomer.
I changed AFTER 1 week, do the first week should be paid
So I got it right, because i called them scammers in public they stole 11$ from my balance, so they maybe paid out everyone but stole me 11$
If this is not a scam ?
If this is not a scam ?
Wait until liqui escrows 0.1 BTC, then leave a negative feedback, and you will get your $11
P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
I think you may want to pay this guy after all. You made a public offer, he seems to have fulfilled his obligations ensuing from this offer while you obviously didn't...
Disclaimer, I am in no way affiliated or otherwise associated with Zoomer
So I got it right, because i called them scammers in public they stole 11$ from my balance, so they maybe paid out everyone but stole me 11$
If this is not a scam ?
If this is not a scam ?
What happened:: Refuse my payout for 1 week signature
Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/liqui-842080
Reference Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/liqui-exchange-signature-campaign-1574664
Amount Scammed: 11$
Payment Method: Bitcoins
Proof of Payment: None
PM/Chat Logs:None
Additional Notes: See below
So after a few members reported that they got no payout including me, I have sent them a few email that I will spread the word on every forum if they do not pay me in 24 hours, they even banned me on the chat when I asked why they scam users by not paying them out
Please note they "work" over 48 hours on the crypto server and it's still not fixed now he admit that he will not pay me seen here : http://archive.is/lDn9j
I did not broke any rules I did leave after 1 week only so not during the campaign
Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/liqui-842080
Reference Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/liqui-exchange-signature-campaign-1574664
Amount Scammed: 11$
Payment Method: Bitcoins
Proof of Payment: None
PM/Chat Logs:None
Additional Notes: See below
So after a few members reported that they got no payout including me, I have sent them a few email that I will spread the word on every forum if they do not pay me in 24 hours, they even banned me on the chat when I asked why they scam users by not paying them out
Please note they "work" over 48 hours on the crypto server and it's still not fixed now he admit that he will not pay me seen here : http://archive.is/lDn9j
I did not broke any rules I did leave after 1 week only so not during the campaign
Hi Zoomer,
I think Liqui isn't a scammer, he didn't scammed.Because I got payment from him and I can see the credit balance clearly. I think server is fully Ok Now.Liqui was told us to be patient because he is working with it & Now we got the result.
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
Otherwise, you win
Only 0.1BTC Pff
Ok. One elaboration - if a lot of scam accusations with PROOF, not like this trolly thread. Otherwise you can open new threads by yourself or with your friends like Zoomer just to win 0.1 BTC. Agree?P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
You get a negative trust from a default trust level member as a proof
Don't catch. Explain this thought...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858
You edited your message. Ok, no problem
You asked to explain, so I tried my best
I've sent a PM to this user who provides the escrow services. You can write him too. The final conditions will be negotiated through him, obviously
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
Otherwise, you win
Only 0.1BTC Pff
Ok. One elaboration - if a lot of scam accusations with PROOF, not like this trolly thread. Otherwise you can open new threads by yourself or with your friends like Zoomer just to win 0.1 BTC. Agree?P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
You get a negative trust from a default trust level member as a proof
Don't catch. Explain this thought...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858
You edited your message. Ok, no problem
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
Otherwise, you win
Only 0.1BTC Pff
Ok. One elaboration - if a lot of scam accusations with PROOF, not like this trolly thread. Otherwise you can open new threads by yourself or with your friends like Zoomer just to win 0.1 BTC. Agree?P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
You get a negative trust from a default trust level member as a proof
Don't catch. Explain this thought...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketplace-trust-211858
Check the last 2 posts in the signature topic, again 2 users claim that they got no payment
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
Otherwise, you win
Only 0.1BTC Pff
Ok. One elaboration - if a lot of scam accusations with PROOF, not like this trolly thread. Otherwise you can open new threads by yourself or with your friends like Zoomer just to win 0.1 BTC. Agree?P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
You get a negative trust from a default trust level member as a proof
Don't catch. Explain this thought...
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
Otherwise, you win
Only 0.1BTC Pff
Ok. One elaboration - if a lot of scam accusations with PROOF, not like this trolly thread. Otherwise you can open new threads by yourself or with your friends like Zoomer just to win 0.1 BTC. Agree?P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
You get a negative trust from a default trust level member as a proof
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
You don't get it. This so-called exchange is trying to attract users by promising to pay 24% annual rate on the money deposited in an account there. The percentage is not that high to make it an outright scam, but to make it worth the effort they have to build a lot of trust at first if they want to scam big time...
In any case, I'm ready to stake 0.1 BTC (an escrow and all that stuff) that they will scam within, say, 3 months (sure bet)
Oh oh) Easy money
Lets do it right now. Bet any amount you want starting from 0.1 BTC and invite trusted escrow. After you loose your money in 3 month - we will credit them proportional to all Liqui customers.
Lets do it right now! Otherwise, you usual troll.
Do you understand that you would have to escrow the same amount? If you agree, let's discuss the specific terms and conditions
Of course, lets do it. No problem. Your bet?
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
Only 0.1BTC Pff
Ok. One elaboration - if a lot of scam accusations with PROOF, not like this trolly thread. Otherwise you can open new threads by yourself or with your friends like Zoomer just to win 0.1 BTC. Agree?P.S. Maybe 1 BTC? Common, man - easy money
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
You don't get it. This so-called exchange is trying to attract users by promising to pay 24% annual rate on the money deposited in an account there. The percentage is not that high to make it an outright scam, but to make it worth the effort they have to build a lot of trust at first if they want to scam big time...
In any case, I'm ready to stake 0.1 BTC (an escrow and all that stuff) that they will scam within, say, 3 months (sure bet)
Oh oh) Easy money
Lets do it right now. Bet any amount you want starting from 0.1 BTC and invite trusted escrow. After you loose your money in 3 month - we will credit them proportional to all Liqui customers.
Lets do it right now! Otherwise, you usual troll.
Do you understand that you would have to escrow the same amount? If you agree, let's discuss the specific terms and conditions
Of course, lets do it. No problem. Your bet?
As I said, I stake 0.1 BTC. If your exchange (liqui.io) closes within 3 months counting from today (the site is no longer available or its contents are no longer relevant to its current operations) and/or there are a lot of scam accusations in respect to this exchange operations, you lose...
Otherwise, you win
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
You don't get it. This so-called exchange is trying to attract users by promising to pay 24% annual rate on the money deposited in an account there. The percentage is not that high to make it an outright scam, but to make it worth the effort they have to build a lot of trust at first if they want to scam big time...
In any case, I'm ready to stake 0.1 BTC (an escrow and all that stuff) that they will scam within, say, 3 months (sure bet)
Oh oh) Easy money
Lets do it right now. Bet any amount you want starting from 0.1 BTC and invite trusted escrow. After you loose your money in 3 month - we will credit them proportional to all Liqui customers.
Lets do it right now! Otherwise, you usual troll.
Do you understand that you would have to escrow the same amount? If you agree, let's discuss the specific terms and conditions
Of course, lets do it. No problem. Your bet?
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
You don't get it. This so-called exchange is trying to attract users by promising to pay 24% annual rate on the money deposited in an account there. The percentage is not that high to make it an outright scam, but to make it worth the effort they have to build a lot of trust at first if they want to scam big time...
In any case, I'm ready to stake 0.1 BTC (an escrow and all that stuff) that they will scam within, say, 3 months (sure bet)
Oh oh) Easy money
Lets do it right now. Bet any amount you want starting from 0.1 BTC and invite trusted escrow. After you loose your money in 3 month - we will credit them proportional to all Liqui customers.
Lets do it right now! Otherwise, you usual troll.
Do you understand that you would have to escrow the same amount? If you agree, let's discuss the specific terms and conditions
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
You don't get it. This so-called exchange is trying to attract users by promising to pay 24% annual rate on the money deposited in an account there. The percentage is not that high to make it an outright scam, but to make it worth the effort they have to build a lot of trust at first if they want to scam big time...
In any case, I'm ready to stake 0.1 BTC (an escrow and all that stuff) that they will scam within, say, 3 months (sure bet)
Oh oh) Easy money
Lets do it right now. Bet any amount you want starting from 0.1 BTC and invite trusted escrow. After you loose your money in 3 month - we will credit them proportional to all Liqui customers.
Lets do it right now! Otherwise, you usual troll.
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
You don't get it. This so-called exchange is trying to attract users by promising to pay 24% annual rate on the money deposited in an account there. The percentage is not that high to make it an outright scam, but to make it worth the effort they have to build a lot of trust at first if they want to scam big time...
In any case, I'm ready to stake 0.1 BTC (an escrow and all that stuff) that they will scam within, say, 3 months (sure bet)
This should be part of the house rules to protect the participants in any signature campaign
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
1. There should be a known campaign manager
2. Funds should be held by an escrow or by the campaign manager.
3. No campaigns will be run only by the owner himself.
seconds trade campaign is conducted without any campaign manager & escrow funds and never see a problem.
I don't think liqui after pay a lot of free ltc/btc decide to scam a couple of dollars (my two cents)
Deposit/withdrawl should be ok now. But some still cant see first payout, we need more time to solve this. But we credited all sig participants accounts one more time today. And when first payout wil be fixed - it will go like prepayment for next week.
yah, Withdraw button is ok now I saw. But still, I can't see my credit balance. I hope you will fix it soon.
And for me the button does not work, so I am not the only once who got none payment
Jump to: