Pages:
Author

Topic: [LIST] HQ posters renting out their signatures, avatars and p. text. - page 5. (Read 2856 times)

legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1215
Just to be clear, the rule is that a user has to have at least 100 Merits received in the last 120 days or overall? I guess it's the first (in the last 120 days), but you should put that in writing just to be clear.
If there's no time limit mentioned, it doesn't make sense to assume 120 days.
Basically, 1006 users qualify.

True. That's why I suggested that OP edit the rule to make it that only those who received 100 Merits in the last 120 days can apply. If anything, it would be easier for him to maintain the list.

Besides, I really think that people who want to rent someone's signature don't care about people who received 100 Merits from the time Merits were introduced on the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Just to be clear, the rule is that a user has to have at least 100 Merits received in the last 120 days or overall? I guess it's the first (in the last 120 days), but you should put that in writing just to be clear.
If there's no time limit mentioned, it doesn't make sense to assume 120 days.
Basically, 1006 users qualify.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1215
The next update will be next week, maybe on Monday, depends on how i am with the free time.
Those who are on the list and have entered in a campaign sig+avatar will be removed. Im considering to change a bit the format and add trust + link to bpip project.

Have a nice weekend guys Smiley

Just to be clear, the rule is that a user has to have at least 100 Merits received in the last 120 days or overall? I guess it's the first (in the last 120 days), but you should put that in writing just to be clear.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 3146
₿uy / $ell
The next update will be next week, maybe on Monday, depends on how i am with the free time.
Those who are on the list and have entered in a campaign sig+avatar will be removed. Im considering to change a bit the format and add trust + link to bpip project.

Have a nice weekend guys Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 3645
Buy/Sell crypto at BestChange
Hugeblack
FR
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
EDIT:
Hey Saint-loup, what's the link to the SigCamp you're in?
You can see here, but it's CFNP now

Thanks for the link - I missed seeing that [ANN] this morning.




Application Submission; there are currently no links to visit privately.

I *think* the link is for the OP so people browsing the list can jump to our respective posts for expanded details.




Thank you, iasenko!

Yes, thank you @iasenko.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
Thanks for creating this thread.
- Here's mine Smiley

| User | Avatar | Signature | P.text | Payment in | Received merit | PM the user | Link to Post |








SFR10
FR
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is.   A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.
Although that's all true, a positive trust score just looks better for advertising.

A user with has a much higher advertising value than a user with or even (I'm ignoring ranks here for the sake of argument).

That may be true if you are looking for someone who (for example) has gained all their trust feedback's via being escrows, or has sold trinkets years ago when people gave out positives for $1 sales of dubious keys that were probably WaReZ created anyway.

A Casino would probably want someone with Game thread credentials, a Mixer probably in the meta, or alt coins, same with an Exchange (alt coins for like) so they probably won't be looking for the cracked codes trust feedback.




But if it massages peoples' egos just that little bit, sign me up to that to.  It was 8/4/0 the other day when some-one dropped off of DT2 (that was probably me that took that screen-shot BTW) - It may have changed again, I don't go looking at such things on a daily basis.

 Roll Eyes  Grin  Cool

(we are talking about wearing signatures still - aren't we??)
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is.   A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.
Although that's all true, a positive trust score just looks better for advertising.

A user with has a much higher advertising value than a user with or even (I'm ignoring ranks here for the sake of argument).
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
| User | Avatar | Signature | P.text | Payment in | Received merit | PM the user | Link to Post |








YOSHIE
FR
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1903
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
| User | Avatar | Signature | P.text | Payment in | Received merit | PM the user | Link to Post |








KTChampions
FR
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
@iasenko Please correct me again  Cheesy I'm in another campaign right now, I'll have at least 4 weeks here  Cheesy So the information should be edited as below:
| User | Avatar | Signature | P.text | Payment in | Received merit | PM the user | Link to Post |








ChuckBuck
IC
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Suggestion: add Trust scores to the list, like pugman did.

Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is.   A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.

My understanding of Trust scores is they fluctuate monthly or, when a user goes from DT2 to Zero and their previously given trusts are suddenly meaningless then hold weight when they bounce back as happened recently with this user.  You could ammend everyone's scores only to have to go back and change them back a week later.  But, if that's what you want to do, don't let me stop you.

My most trusted score is around the 215 -235 - 255 band usually.




Hey Saint-loup, what's the link to the SigCamp you're in?
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Suggestion: add Trust scores to the list, like pugman did.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1727
Be A Hope
| User | Avatar | Signature | P.text | Payment in | Received merit | PM the user | Link to Post |








Kalemder
FR
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 2054
Thanks for listed me.

What you guys think?
I agree with you
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
I thoguth to inlude turst but it will be too much info, maybe link to BPIP for more stats instead and replace the post link. What you guys think?
Yes, I think the link to BPIP is good to see more information, from BPIP, we can see more information if necessary, it's quite convenient. By the way, I see a small error in my trust in BPIP compared to here, I don't know whether to report it to the implementers  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 3146
₿uy / $ell
@ChuckBuck Updated, wrote just BTC to save some space Smiley
@DroomieChikito You are also on the list with a small correction, 600+ received merit.

I thoguth to inlude turst but it will be too much info, maybe link to BPIP for more stats instead and replace the post link. What you guys think?
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
@ChuckBuck @Saint-loup @bitmover @STT
On the list Smiley
Can you make some edits, pls?
| User | Avatar | Signature | P.text | Payment in | Received merit | PM the user | Link to Post |








ChuckBuck
FR
Pages:
Jump to:
© 2020, Bitcointalksearch.org