Knowing how trustworthy a Campaign Manager is is not the same as knowing how trustworthy (or not) a SigCamp participant is. A SigCamp participant only has to post, whereas a Campaign Manager has to hold funds tally participants posts, update spreadsheets and of course pay the participants on time.
Although that's all true, a positive trust score just looks better for advertising.
A user with
has a much higher advertising value than a user with
or even
(I'm ignoring ranks here for the sake of argument).
That may be true if you are looking for someone who (for example) has gained all their trust feedback's via being escrows, or has sold trinkets years ago when people gave out positives for $1 sales of dubious keys that were probably WaReZ created anyway.
A Casino would probably want someone with Game thread credentials, a Mixer probably in the meta, or alt coins, same with an Exchange (alt coins for like) so they probably won't be looking for the cracked codes trust feedback.
But if it massages peoples' egos just that little bit, sign me up to that to. It was 8/4/0 the other day when some-one dropped off of DT2 (that was probably me that took that screen-shot BTW) - It may have changed again, I don't go looking at such things on a daily basis.
(we are talking about wearing signatures still - aren't we??)