Pages:
Author

Topic: List of all cryptocoins - page 58. (Read 833058 times)

hero member
Activity: 627
Merit: 501
October 28, 2013, 03:47:19 PM
Can the OP add TagCoin please

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
October 25, 2013, 10:10:25 AM
Some Now Guys News Upgrates
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
October 24, 2013, 10:45:11 AM
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


Excellent Idea!!!   Now we just need to turn those DATA POINTS into Some SCORE

Age in Days Blockchain active  =     ######  Days  (up to 400 years old)
hashrate in MH/s                   =     ####### Mh/s (up to Petabytes)
Market Cap in USD thousands$ =     #######  (up to billions $)

Trade volume 
has to be standardized to
BTC Value of Exchange of Alt Coin  =  ######  BTC Value of Daily Exchange Trades

Transactions per day or per block?  = ######  absolute number or avg. trans./block?

I would be very interested in working with others on such a tool ... - digeros
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Switchercoin.com
October 24, 2013, 06:32:36 AM
thank for the info
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
October 23, 2013, 03:25:19 PM
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.



Yes would like also to know that

Well, the list could be sorted by a combined score but this score should be resistant to manipulation. Take downloads for example. This one is easy to pump by buying some downloads from a botnet for $1.5.
Exchange trade volume? There are exchanges that don't charge fees, so again you might invite scammers to pump the volume.
A) Exchange trade fees of the last 30d in $$? Would be a good one but it's not as easy to determine.
B) Age in seconds is easy and a block chain surviving should be a sign of stability that is hard to fake.
C) Market cap in $$ is definitely worth a thought.
D) Number of running nodes.

score = A * 30 + B * 0.1 + C * D * 0.0001 … something along these lines. Sure the formula and the constants can be tuned to make the one or the other look good but we should talk about a formula and not just one determining value. That said: I have no AltCoins at all and feel like 99% of them are get rich quick schemes by the people running them but I don't want to be the last to know if any of them actually is to be taken seriously.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
October 23, 2013, 12:34:39 PM
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.



Yes would like also to know that
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
October 23, 2013, 12:22:51 PM
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.

full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 102
October 23, 2013, 11:36:59 AM
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
October 22, 2013, 07:03:56 PM
Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.

+1

yeah to tell the truth as much as I've given microguy and the dev team plenty of stick, still gldcoin has proven itself, and has a strong enough community to be considered a candidate.

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 22, 2013, 05:58:30 AM
Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.

+1

yeah to tell the truth as much as I've given microguy and the dev team plenty of stick, still gldcoin has proven itself, and has a strong enough community to be considered a candidate.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
October 20, 2013, 01:34:30 PM
Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Incakoin= Incagold
October 20, 2013, 08:46:06 AM
Introducing Incakoin

The Incakoin Community would like to welcome you to our latest Crypto Currency



www.incakoin.com

SHA-256 ASIC Friendly
Proof of work/Proof of Stake
Name: Incakoin
Acronym: NKA
Private Premine with all coins being used for development ie. Pools Servers Games
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-premining-178697
Starting addy will be letter N or NK
420NKA per block not to drop below 2
Max coins 190 million coins half every 6 months
5000 blocks to mature
5 blocks to re target
Transaction messaging
30sec/blocks
Only 3 confirms for transaction
UPNP & QR support
logo imbedded in wallet

Wallet Client

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B49exKIsGBn5aXVTN243TVk1NlE/edit?usp=sharing&pli=1

Connect via 17420

addnode=58.97.221.51
addnode=115.78.135.173


Needed:

Pools: P2P & Stratum Reward 50K NKA

Online Poker Room Reward 50K NKA


Merchants

Donations

Exchanges

Reasonable Bounties Available

Contact [email protected] for more info


legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
October 19, 2013, 10:27:37 PM
The next time you update your list I would appreciate if you could include my coin, Cinnamon Coin

Website:  www.cinnamoncoin.org

Thread here in bitcoin forum: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cinnamon-coin-141-cin-no-premine-pow-pos-trade-on-coins-e-299221

Support on cryptocointalk.com : https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/1220-cinnamoncoin-cin-information/

Block Explorer: https://andarazoroflove.org/explorer/cinnamoncoin/block_crawler.php

Unofficial Mining Pool: http://pool.800996.com:8502/ (thanks to Spark_li)

Why I launched the coin: http://cinnamoncoin.org/wp/?p=18

hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
:)
October 17, 2013, 10:14:57 AM
Please add coin control to the description of Anoncoin, 0.8.5.5 is released and includes coin control.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
October 17, 2013, 05:29:21 AM
I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead  Undecided
yes Yacoin is very promising.
I was accumulating yacoin last 3 months silently. I expect it can grow much in value. I think in next half year or so we will see the same evaluation of several cryptocoins like this year's spike on bitcoin. Some cryptocoins will grow exponentially, it might be XPM or Yacoin or Litecoin but who knows?
Personally my favourites are also Quarkcoin and Securecoin and IFC but who knows what people decide and what majority of people will put their money in?
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
October 17, 2013, 05:03:00 AM
THE ORIGINAL CRYPTOCOIN LIST [version October 14, 2013]

thank you very much for updating the list of coins. I sent you a small LTC donation. it is very nicely written. A must read for all people.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 253
October 16, 2013, 04:57:57 AM
xorxor thank you for maintaining this great list! did you think about moving it to the wiki? Guess the edit war would be epic Grin

It was immediately copied to wiki, 10 months ago just after first relase and it was trolled the fcuk out.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
October 15, 2013, 10:27:22 PM
xorxor thank you for maintaining this great list! did you think about moving it to the wiki? Guess the edit war would be epic Grin
hero member
Activity: 802
Merit: 1003
GCVMMWH
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
October 15, 2013, 04:04:32 PM
I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead  Undecided

Namecoin is dead?  Lol, unreal.  What's next, Litecoin?  Lol
Pages:
Jump to: