Topic: List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign - page 15. (Read 32248 times)

I have never written 20 posts. Usually it is 8-12 per day. I confess I realize the mistake. But they do not even give me the right to appeal. Democracy ...

This is not an excuse. It is a fact. There is not a single line about this in the campaign rules. If there are no rules, how can one demand something? This is ordinary arbitrariness. This is not done even in third world countries where dictators rule. Are we for freedom? Right?

That's a great excuse, use it next time you get caught speeding and let us know how it works out for you.

Who asked you to write fast,if they have 20 max posts per day doesn't necessarily mean you have to hit it hard.

Constructive =/= spam: If you are posting something unnecessarily for financial gains then it also spamming.

You violated the rules of campaign manager so you got removed.

I was banned for writing too fast. I did not write constantly like that, it was only two days. I did not have time. Yes, I'm wrong. But I did not see such a requirement in the rules. I always tried to keep the quality of the posts and not write non-constructive posts. My mistake is that I wrote fast. Even the most violent criminal has the right to appeal and pardon. I am not a criminal.

If you were given a second chance would not it be unfair for all those 200 plus accounts which were banned for the same mistake or would you suggest to give all of the them a second chance ?  

Answer for your question available in the third page itself.Next time read the threads before saying something.
Which means you will not be given any choice so better accept it and move on.

I doubt if you will get that opportunity again. Yahoo is a campaign manager who always requests participants to follow high quality standards when participating in the campaigns he manages. He even gives people time to adjust but by the time you are banned then that means it was too much. 
The rules were clear but decided to ignore them anyway.

How can I regain the confidence of the campaign and get another chance? Yes, I'm to blame, there were 2 days when I posted too fast. Please consider my request and satisfy, this will not happen again.

No one replied to those themes/projects for about an year and i do not think that your posts added anything which was worth reading as per as updates on those projects were concerned.  Btw i had to google translate those posts in local Russian section to check if there was anything that important.

And you do not need to write in ALL the fresh projects. Just pick the ones who have interest in them and have something unique to share.

Good comparison with the socks. I just thought the 2018 themes aren't that old. Will try write in more for fresh themes!

"If you can dream it, you can do it" (Walt Disney)

But on an other, less poetic note: Do you go to a cemetery to dig out who is around there just to wish them a good day?

It's possible to wear the same socks for a year but that doesn't mean you should do it.


Necrobumping dead shitcoins is about as pointless as it gets.

What's the problem? Isn't it possible to write in old themes?

I'm quoting you because your case was the same as mine but you judged him at just one post. Reporting posts is good but asking for bans need evidence that the person is solely posting to make a buck as quickly as possible without having to put any efforts to make that post effective and spam free. Well, I also reported a person bharal07 with an unwanted post but didn't judge him, I just asked if he should be paid for such post or not. I see many users get paid for such bs and then either delete those posts themselves or get them deleted by moderators, but I don't know how they just slip away from the hands of the manager before Yobit pays them.

I don't know they bump old topic
user : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/mandoy-831262
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52797915
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52786746
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52786827
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52786609
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52783560
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52784893
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52785726
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52783247
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52777494
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52777655

Ah. Got it.

I didn't expect you to be someone who wasn't just spamming all around the boards. So for that accusation I apologize. I must say that a good deal of what I said came from the fact that we had a large amount of people from this campaign spamming random BS in the P&S board so I apoligize on taking it out on you and not looking into your information properly.

I think the second poster annoyed me a lot more then you. So I apologize again. Happy posting.

If you think i am a spammer, you should had checked my post history and evaluate it based on my activity. If you just mean that am not a good poster, may be you're right but your judgement is based on one single post !!
 So just you think i have to be banned from the campaign  because i post something you saw that it is not in "pretty high level of real discussion". Do i really deserve this in your opinion?
As English is not my first language, you may conclude that am not a very good english poster, but i think my level is not that bad and i invite manager to check my posts since i joined the cryptotalk campaign.

Yes it looks cool, i invite you to watch it. The video is in unknown language for me so i just asked if someone can help explain it and if the topic is in his appropriate board. What's wrong with this? BTW, my post is the first in that topic.

All my respect to all your personal view, but don't you think it's not fair to judge someone by "spammer" and "shitposter" only based on that personal view for a one single post?
What about someone has personal view that you reported my post in the wrong thread in Services board, then post it again here with an explanation that you were wrong, all these is a try from you to increase the number of your posts as you are also in a sig campaign. Do you think his judgement in his personal view is acceptable by reason without checking your post history and quality as well?

So you don't care about my activity, and you don't care about checking my post history, and you don't also care about my merit activity, but you can judge my post quality according to one post. Thanks God that you are not the manager for this campaign.

You're welcome.
Suggestion: if you think one of my post is far from your standards, please don't hesitate to report it to Mods as they always can make the right judgement. If you find more posts, it will be nice from you to report about it here.

Report to moderator, not here. That user is a Jr. Member and doesn't even have a signature.

He's not a participant but imma report him anyway. I've checked the list, Vertex_ICO isn't there, but clearly this person is burst-posting.

Proof:






On top of that, its all on the same thread; the said person is also the OP. Even if he/she is the OP, it's still a violation, is it not? I mean this person could've just included all of this--in one post. He's a good poster tho.

I had never said that I was attempting your ability to post on the boar.d

I'm not going to go through your activity to determine if you're a good poster most of the time. I really couldn't care less. But when you come into a board that TRIES to keep a pretty high level of real discussion (stressing the world try here) and you post some spam bullshit about you being unable to understand whats being said but it looks cool. In my personal view, that amounts to you spamming for the sake of gaining a couple bucks.

Cool. You've increased in your merits since joining. Great. That doesn't mean anything in regards to quality of posting.

I've reported it here, and to board moderators. Thanks.