Topic: List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign - page 16. (Read 32248 times)

This is my response moved from the wrong board as squatz mentioned above:

I've been told that I may have posted my original post in the wrong spot. Here's the new post, hopefully this reaches Yahoo without me having to pm him.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/change-username-5192391

A reply by bharal07 saying:


Was it needed? Already told by many users at least >5 times. Should he be paid for this post?

Both of you, keep this in the other thread please.

You can open a new topic with a new investigation, but your arguments do not look convincing. Do not disgrace, your attempt to slander me failed. You are disgusting to me, please do not quote me anymore.

Please do not lie. The investigation is still ongoing.
And it turns out that your family is growing in size. Friends have already appeared:

I have been reading that topic and unfortunately proving you 2 are father and son will be hard to do. I believe I said this already but even if you were to have a conference call on skype it wouldn't prove much. It would prove that there are 2 people in the room but not that 1 person isn't controlling both accounts.

I can only go with the evidence that can be proven. You both used the same address when joining bounty campaigns. Maybe not the same campaigns, but still the same address showing that all the tokens earned are going to 1 wallet. Whether you're father and son is irrelevant.

The forum has seen this story multiple times. 99.9% of the time it's likely bs and someone trying to get a neg off their account so that they can still cheat a campaign. I'm not forming an opinion either way as to whether your story is true or false. I am just going by the evidence I can see and see proved.

Just a piece of advice if you decide to continue on this forum, don't ever share an address with another account. Don't send your tokens to each other. Don't join the same bounties. Keep yourself separate and show you are individual users. I know it probably saves ya a dollar or 2 in fees here and there but is it worth all the drama you've had to put up with over the last few days?

Sir, please read this topic. Looks like I was slandered by a false accusation. I do not ask you to return me to the campaign, but please do rehabilitation, I am not a bounty cheater. It was a planned attack by a detractor with the goal of ruining my reputation. Thanks.

So annoying now, like seeing ghosts, day and night. "Dt".

very difficult to be in indigo natural life.
I should have to use a magnifying glass.
Even that doesn't look too clean.
Did not expect.

End the profile or Trust page URL with a ";dt" (without quotations marks), and you'll see scores/feedback from the perspective of someone who trusts ratings of DefaultTrust only at lvl 2 depth.

e: typo

Only 1 of those users is showing as +0/ =0/ -1 and that is izotoniq. He has not even made 1 post in 18 days of being in the campaign but is banned now. The other 2 are showing as all 0s except Itsmylife has 1 neutral. Your trust list must be different then mine.

I saw the list, a ban on the Cryptotalk campaign.
But not found the name of the person below.

The account below has Negative trust.

1. Itsmylife :trust; +0 / = 0 / - 1
2. izotoniq :trust; +0 / = 0 / - 1 registered
3. Webetcoins: trust; +0 / = 0 / - 1
4. bill gator trust; +13 / = 1/ - 9

Hello, @yahoo62278

I did not remove the signature.
I just switched to the signature version 24.09.
I guess you did check during this transition process.
please recheck again

Not actually a bad post for its semantics, though. Only in this case, where the user is consistently spamming posts with low depth and investment in their replies, would I call it a spam post.

That is, part of a collective rather than the individual.
As an outlier, it would be a case of the user expressing their ideas poorly due to lackluster use of the language, not of lackadaisical replies.

Minersday... that reminds me
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47859323

He owns a number of hacked and bought accounts and is a serial farmer and shitposter. Some of his accounts can be found in this campaign.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hahahafr-66502  banned for spam/burstposting
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/anonylz-153613

He's also evading a ban since March.

Just see this post by febriyana and its a perfect example of a paragraph spam and avoiding the one liner spam. 

For sure expressing humor in a written way (not to talk about language barriers) is a totally different story than in a face-to-face- conversation by design.

Anyway, let´s not exploit this thread since there is a chance that not everybody will have the same sense of humor   Instead you may add a regular visit at WO to your schedule and we possibly see us there (I am just a reader since english isn´t my mothertongue, but hey, I will read and probably smile behind my laptop - thanks in advance)

Ah, that's a thread I rarely visit so I shall have to take you at your word that there is humor there.  There sure isn't much around the other parts of the forum--part of that is because many people around here don't know how to write, and part of it is that this forum is a huge melting pot of cultures from all over the world, and standards of humor can vary widely.

Thank you for being on my side as far as that word goes.  And you know, I always use it in my everyday life to be polite and show respect to people.  But here?  It's invariably used to smooch up to DT members, campaign managers, and anyone else these suck-asses think has some sort of authority, usually when the smoocher has done something wrong or wants something for themselves.

Yep.  But that requires a person to put some thought and effort into writing their post, and we all know most members of bitcointalk put as little thinking into what they write as humanly possible.  It's hard to write something funny or thoughtful when you've got 60 alt accounts that need to crank out their maximum number of posts for their bounties.  Ya know?

The community consensus is that saying sir is unneeded and associated with spammers however we have to think about the different cultures that come to the forum and sir is a common way to address someone that you do not know the names of. If you have ever been overseas specifically the middle east you will be called sir very often. Its part of the way they speak and should not be labelled as spammers any more than a cultural difference. Members have to be more accepting on a international forum of how people speak in a language they are not native too.

Again "sir"... How many times do we need to tell  for not using this word "Sir"