Topic: list of bitcoin-like proposed currencies and chains - page 2. (Read 17119 times)
Timecoin might be a future spotlight, especially when the difficulty rise further and per block reward cut in 2013
I'm interested. I've actually doubled my reward to 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female.
-BlowjobCoin (doesn't need a block chain; 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female; centralized issuing by tomcollins)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.114752
I was going to add it to the list, but you can issue IOUs in any unit you want using ripple, even blowjobs.
If it doesn't need a block chain, I don't think it has to be in the list.
Hi, I'm starting an alternative to BlowjobCoin called BJCoin. It's exactly the same as BlowjobCoin in every way except miners get paid 100 coins per blowjob instead of 2!
This will definitely work and I will be a millionaire because I got in at day 0!
I'm interested. I've actually doubled my reward to 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female.
-BlowjobCoin (doesn't need a block chain; 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female; centralized issuing by tomcollins)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.114752
I was going to add it to the list, but you can issue IOUs in any unit you want using ripple, even blowjobs.
If it doesn't need a block chain, I don't think it has to be in the list.
Hi, I'm starting an alternative to BlowjobCoin called BJCoin. It's exactly the same as BlowjobCoin in every way except miners get paid 100 coins per blowjob instead of 2!
This will definitely work and I will be a millionaire because I got in at day 0!
How about doing all of those... but setting it up so that coins in the BitCoin chain must be publicly destroyed before creating the same amount of coins in these others. This will eliminate any problems with inflation and increase acceptance of these alternatives. If successful, then perhaps BitCoin could have the same mechanism of accepting coins from these other types... so long as these other coins are publicly destroyed before moving them back into the BitCoin system.
Entropy in human behavior and software development cycles would play havoc with trying to have them destroyed.
An abundance of variants would cause inflation to crash in bitcoin making all of them stronger due to the competition.
The destination key could be the hash of some block within the last 24 hours. That would be good proof that the BitCoins are destroyed in the BitCoin chain. The chance that someone has a private key of a block hash is near zero... and good proof of their destruction.
I would rather see an attempt at compatibility, rather than a lot of competing electronic currencies.
EDIT: If the main block chain can see the number of coins being destroyed/sent to an alternative system, then the alternative system has a reference to verify that there is no inflation.
Bitcoin behavior is having no effect on gold. Creation of variants even through the same software are naturally separate. There would be no inflation except within a currency. Think of cross currency trades like gears pushing each other. Instead of a trade you have a turn of the gear and people exchanging seats on the gears.
Destroying gains you nothing. The percentages are the same whether you have 50 of A and B or 100 of each.
Two merry-go-rounds if you prefer that metaphor.
As for compatibility, I proposed a 4 tier system arrangement which allows variants, bitcoin, and bitcoin sister currencies to play nicely through a basket currency.
I'm starting that Monday.
Without an agreement upon the number of coins in the system, these projects only serve to dilute the efficacy of BitCoins by confusion for the end users. I strongly oppose this, as it just servers to divide (and conquer?) the BitCoin project.
They are separate systems so again the existence of similar systems has no bearing on the value of bitcoin itself. It reinforces the most common use of bitcoin: storage of value. So bitcoin is unaffected and with a tier of specialized fundamentals (storage space, bandwidth, cpu sharing) plus a basket currency on top of it, bitcoin is shielded from their dynamics. Then the 4th tier is all these currencies and they will most of the time be traded for the basket currency.
Similar currencies do not divide bitcoin. They allow people to use the one similar currency that they understand most. Eventually they will learn the dynamics and choose bitcoin as being the one with the least amount of insanity which will be great for all the currencies.
See a lot of people like to solve problems with more systems rather than more knowledge and participation.
How about doing all of those... but setting it up so that coins in the BitCoin chain must be publicly destroyed before creating the same amount of coins in these others. This will eliminate any problems with inflation and increase acceptance of these alternatives. If successful, then perhaps BitCoin could have the same mechanism of accepting coins from these other types... so long as these other coins are publicly destroyed before moving them back into the BitCoin system.
Entropy in human behavior and software development cycles would play havoc with trying to have them destroyed.
An abundance of variants would cause inflation to crash in bitcoin making all of them stronger due to the competition.
The destination key could be the hash of some block within the last 24 hours. That would be good proof that the BitCoins are destroyed in the BitCoin chain. The chance that someone has a private key of a block hash is near zero... and good proof of their destruction.
I would rather see an attempt at compatibility, rather than a lot of competing electronic currencies.
EDIT: If the main block chain can see the number of coins being destroyed/sent to an alternative system, then the alternative system has a reference to verify that there is no inflation.
Bitcoin behavior is having no effect on gold. Creation of variants even through the same software are naturally separate. There would be no inflation except within a currency. Think of cross currency trades like gears pushing each other. Instead of a trade you have a turn of the gear and people exchanging seats on the gears.
Destroying gains you nothing. The percentages are the same whether you have 50 of A and B or 100 of each.
Two merry-go-rounds if you prefer that metaphor.
As for compatibility, I proposed a 4 tier system arrangement which allows variants, bitcoin, and bitcoin sister currencies to play nicely through a basket currency.
I'm starting that Monday.
Without an agreement upon the number of coins in the system, these projects only serve to dilute the efficacy of BitCoins by confusion for the end users. I strongly oppose this, as it just servers to divide (and conquer?) the BitCoin project.
Based on the idea of Blowcoin...
What if we create a fork just for illegal transactions? Nobody will ever use it of course, but we can point to it and say "oh no, nothing illegal going on here, that all happens over there -->".
What if we create a fork just for illegal transactions? Nobody will ever use it of course, but we can point to it and say "oh no, nothing illegal going on here, that all happens over there -->".
LOL. but then we now have .xxx
Based on the idea of Blowcoin...
What if we create a fork just for illegal transactions? Nobody will ever use it of course, but we can point to it and say "oh no, nothing illegal going on here, that all happens over there -->".
What if we create a fork just for illegal transactions? Nobody will ever use it of course, but we can point to it and say "oh no, nothing illegal going on here, that all happens over there -->".
How about doing all of those... but setting it up so that coins in the BitCoin chain must be publicly destroyed before creating the same amount of coins in these others. This will eliminate any problems with inflation and increase acceptance of these alternatives. If successful, then perhaps BitCoin could have the same mechanism of accepting coins from these other types... so long as these other coins are publicly destroyed before moving them back into the BitCoin system.
Entropy in human behavior and software development cycles would play havoc with trying to have them destroyed.
An abundance of variants would cause inflation to crash in bitcoin making all of them stronger due to the competition.
The destination key could be the hash of some block within the last 24 hours. That would be good proof that the BitCoins are destroyed in the BitCoin chain. The chance that someone has a private key of a block hash is near zero... and good proof of their destruction.
I would rather see an attempt at compatibility, rather than a lot of competing electronic currencies.
EDIT: If the main block chain can see the number of coins being destroyed/sent to an alternative system, then the alternative system has a reference to verify that there is no inflation.
Bitcoin behavior is having no effect on gold. Creation of variants even through the same software are naturally separate. There would be no inflation except within a currency. Think of cross currency trades like gears pushing each other. Instead of a trade you have a turn of the gear and people exchanging seats on the gears.
Destroying gains you nothing. The percentages are the same whether you have 50 of A and B or 100 of each.
Two merry-go-rounds if you prefer that metaphor.
As for compatibility, I proposed a 4 tier system arrangement which allows variants, bitcoin, and bitcoin sister currencies to play nicely through a basket currency.
I'm starting that Monday.
How about doing all of those... but setting it up so that coins in the BitCoin chain must be publicly destroyed before creating the same amount of coins in these others. This will eliminate any problems with inflation and increase acceptance of these alternatives. If successful, then perhaps BitCoin could have the same mechanism of accepting coins from these other types... so long as these other coins are publicly destroyed before moving them back into the BitCoin system.
Entropy in human behavior and software development cycles would play havoc with trying to have them destroyed.
An abundance of variants would cause inflation to crash in bitcoin making all of them stronger due to the competition.
The destination key could be the hash of some block within the last 24 hours. That would be good proof that the BitCoins are destroyed in the BitCoin chain. The chance that someone has a private key of a block hash is near zero... and good proof of their destruction.
I would rather see an attempt at compatibility, rather than a lot of competing electronic currencies.
EDIT: If the main block chain can see the number of coins being destroyed/sent to an alternative system, then the alternative system has a reference to verify that there is no inflation.
How about doing all of those... but setting it up so that coins in the BitCoin chain must be publicly destroyed before creating the same amount of coins in these others. This will eliminate any problems with inflation and increase acceptance of these alternatives. If successful, then perhaps BitCoin could have the same mechanism of accepting coins from these other types... so long as these other coins are publicly destroyed before moving them back into the BitCoin system.
Entropy in human behavior and software development cycles would play havoc with trying to have them destroyed.
An abundance of variants would cause inflation to crash in bitcoin making all of them stronger due to the competition.
How about doing all of those... but setting it up so that coins in the BitCoin chain must be publicly destroyed before creating the same amount of coins in these others. This will eliminate any problems with inflation and increase acceptance of these alternatives. If successful, then perhaps BitCoin could have the same mechanism of accepting coins from these other types... so long as these other coins are publicly destroyed before moving them back into the BitCoin system.
What's the exchange rate between those and BTC?
The market will decide.
BlowCoin
private, fully anonymous currency reserved for illegal activities and criminals everywhere. Legitimate activities are discouraged to use BlowCoin because it only confuses the public, we gotta know who the baddies are and if you use BlowCoin you are definitely a bad-ass. Can be used by/backed with blow, blow dealers, blow jobs from hookers, weapons smugglers and bombers who like to blow things up.
Ripple is really interesting, both for the fact that it's genuinely revolutionary (no kidding here, the implications seem to run deep) and for the fact that it's been going since 2006 and hasn't really taken off, not compared to bitcoin. Financial incentives are higher for early adopters of btc maybe... at any rate, ripple is pretty cool. Good idea with that blockchain thing!
Thank you.
If, like me, you're interested in alternative currencies, you may like these links:
http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Money
http://p2pfoundation.net/Open_Money
http://www.complementarycurrency.org/ccDatabase/les_public.html
By the way, probably bitcoin should be listed there as a complementary currency.
And just for people reading this list, there's also Open Transactions, not really bitcoin like but complementary in every way. https://github.com/FellowTraveler/Open-Transactions
I'm not sure, but I think bitcoin and ripple can integrate with open transactions. If not, I think they will.
Blowjobcoin - you get one coin for each blowjob you give me.
If you're not interested it this thread, you can just ignore it.
I'm interested. I've actually doubled my reward to 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female.
What's the exchange rate between those and BTC?
I'm interested. I've actually doubled my reward to 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female.
;;buy 2 BJC at 0.95 BLOWJOBS no paypal sorry
Bitgold
Basically we just simply take the bitcoin source, search and replace 'bitcoin' with 'bitgold' and start generating gold ... we need to change few things like port number and etc so it plays nicely with bitcoin and we could also change a few rules like say issue the say total amount of bitgold bits as there are currently physical grams of gold in the world (over the next 56years say?) and keep it inflating at same approx. rate that gold is being mined up ~2.25% ...
Basically we just simply take the bitcoin source, search and replace 'bitcoin' with 'bitgold' and start generating gold ... we need to change few things like port number and etc so it plays nicely with bitcoin and we could also change a few rules like say issue the say total amount of bitgold bits as there are currently physical grams of gold in the world (over the next 56years say?) and keep it inflating at same approx. rate that gold is being mined up ~2.25% ...
It seems similar to AgBitcoin and such. Gold mining will eventually stop, so if you want to emulate gold, the supply should stop at some point like in bitcoin. I'll add it to the othercoin sublist.
Bitgold
Basically we just simply take the bitcoin source, search and replace 'bitcoin' with 'bitgold' and start generating gold ... we need to change few things like port number and etc so it plays nicely with bitcoin and we could also change a few rules like say issue the say total amount of bitgold bits as there are currently physical grams of gold in the world (over the next 56years say?) and keep it inflating at same approx. rate that gold is being mined up ~2.25% ...
Basically we just simply take the bitcoin source, search and replace 'bitcoin' with 'bitgold' and start generating gold ... we need to change few things like port number and etc so it plays nicely with bitcoin and we could also change a few rules like say issue the say total amount of bitgold bits as there are currently physical grams of gold in the world (over the next 56years say?) and keep it inflating at same approx. rate that gold is being mined up ~2.25% ...
I'm interested. I've actually doubled my reward to 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female.
-BlowjobCoin (doesn't need a block chain; 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female; centralized issuing by tomcollins)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.114752
I was going to add it to the list, but you can issue IOUs in any unit you want using ripple, even blowjobs.
If it doesn't need a block chain, I don't think it has to be in the list.
Ripple is really interesting, both for the fact that it's genuinely revolutionary (no kidding here, the implications seem to run deep) and for the fact that it's been going since 2006 and hasn't really taken off, not compared to bitcoin. Financial incentives are higher for early adopters of btc maybe... at any rate, ripple is pretty cool. Good idea with that blockchain thing!
Thank you.
If, like me, you're interested in alternative currencies, you may like these links:
http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Money
http://p2pfoundation.net/Open_Money
http://www.complementarycurrency.org/ccDatabase/les_public.html
By the way, probably bitcoin should be listed there as a complementary currency.
And just for people reading this list, there's also Open Transactions, not really bitcoin like but complementary in every way. https://github.com/FellowTraveler/Open-Transactions
I'm not sure, but I think bitcoin and ripple can integrate with open transactions. If not, I think they will.
Blowjobcoin - you get one coin for each blowjob you give me.
If you're not interested it this thread, you can just ignore it.
I'm interested. I've actually doubled my reward to 2 Blowjob coins per blowjob given, and 20 if it's a hot female.
Ripple is really interesting, both for the fact that it's genuinely revolutionary (no kidding here, the implications seem to run deep) and for the fact that it's been going since 2006 and hasn't really taken off, not compared to bitcoin. Financial incentives are higher for early adopters of btc maybe... at any rate, ripple is pretty cool. Good idea with that blockchain thing!
Thank you.
If, like me, you're interested in alternative currencies, you may like these links:
http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Money
http://p2pfoundation.net/Open_Money
http://www.complementarycurrency.org/ccDatabase/les_public.html
By the way, probably bitcoin should be listed there as a complementary currency.
And just for people reading this list, there's also Open Transactions, not really bitcoin like but complementary in every way. https://github.com/FellowTraveler/Open-Transactions
I'm not sure, but I think bitcoin and ripple can integrate with open transactions. If not, I think they will.
Blowjobcoin - you get one coin for each blowjob you give me.
If you're not interested it this thread, you can just ignore it.
Jump to: