I can post more than these people and I do post more than these people sometimes. Doesn't make me a spammer...
You have no idea what you're doing with this thread.
Topic: List of Signature Spammers here on BCT (Read 847 times)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6115794
edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
A constructive or useful post doesn't necessarily mean lines and lines of text. edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
What do you mean I'm making an especially big effort in correcting my grammar? Find me a post of mine to the contrary. You've just made baseless accusations with no evidence based merely on people who post a lot. I've just pointed out your assumptions and hypocrisy in your main criteria. This thread doesn't serve anything when it's inaccurate, unless your goal is to just troll or attempt to agitate people and invite the people you obviously have a problem with postong to make even more (constructive) posts (or spam as you seem to call it). And I don't care whether I'm on the list or removed from it because it's currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion.
edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
I dont get your point or see what's the relevance of that post here? That was correcting the above user's post incorrectly blaming the source of the price drop on China when it was down to nothing but panic sellers.
And why post? Well I need to to make my case for a start, but I don't care whether I'm put on or removed from somebodies troll list, but I'm not going to just let people lie about me and not defend my inclusion when it is unjust. I'm also pointing out your hypocrisy and contradictions and this is now available for all to see so they can make their own mind up with the evidence.
What do you mean 'not been making a significant presence'? That sounds contradictory with your accusations, but it also sounds like your own misinformed opinion again and you're clutching at straws. High post count is irrelevant unless it's all spam or nonsense, but according to you I'm a bigger spammer than you even though I don't fit your initial criteria and you do.
I openly admit to spamming last time. However, I have since then tried to post with some purpose in mind, not only to spam.
lolwat? It seems you don't have a problem with you or others posting crap and meeting your own criteria, but rather the volume of certain peoples' posts. If you see any spam on the forum you can always report the posts and help out, but I bet you never do.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
What do you mean I'm making an especially big effort in correcting my grammar? Find me a post of mine to the contrary. You've just made baseless accusations with no evidence based merely on people who post a lot. I've just pointed out your assumptions and hypocrisy in your main criteria. This thread doesn't serve anything when it's inaccurate, unless your goal is to just troll or attempt to agitate people and invite the people you obviously have a problem with postong to make even more (constructive) posts (or spam as you seem to call it). And I don't care whether I'm on the list or removed from it because it's currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion.
edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
I dont get your point or see what's the relevance of that post here? That was correcting the above user's post incorrectly blaming the source of the price drop on China when it was down to nothing but panic sellers.
And why post? Well I need to to make my case for a start, but I don't care whether I'm put on or removed from somebodies troll list, but I'm not going to just let people lie about me and not defend my inclusion when it is unjust. I'm also pointing out your hypocrisy and contradictions and this is now available for all to see so they can make their own mind up with the evidence.
What do you mean 'not been making a significant presence'? That sounds contradictory with your accusations, but it also sounds like your own misinformed opinion again and you're clutching at straws. High post count is irrelevant unless it's all spam or nonsense, but according to you I'm a bigger spammer than you even though I don't fit your initial criteria and you do.
I openly admit to spamming last time. However, I have since then tried to post with some purpose in mind, not only to spam.
lolwat? It seems you don't have a problem with you or others posting crap and meeting your own criteria, but rather the volume of certain peoples' posts. If you see any spam on the forum you can always report the posts and help out, but I bet you never do.
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
What do you mean I'm making an especially big effort in correcting my grammar? Find me a post of mine to the contrary. You've just made baseless accusations with no evidence based merely on people who post a lot. I've just pointed out your assumptions and hypocrisy in your main criteria. This thread doesn't serve anything when it's inaccurate, unless your goal is to just troll or attempt to agitate people and invite the people you obviously have a problem with postong to make even more (constructive) posts (or spam as you seem to call it). And I don't care whether I'm on the list or removed from it because it's currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion.
edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
I dont get your point or see what's the relevance of that post here? That was correcting the above user's post incorrectly blaming the source of the price drop on China when it was down to nothing but panic sellers.
And why post? Well I need to to make my case for a start, but I don't care whether I'm put on or removed from somebodies troll list, but I'm not going to just let people lie about me and not defend my inclusion when it is unjust. I'm also pointing out your hypocrisy and contradictions and this is now available for all to see so they can make their own mind up with the evidence.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
What do you mean I'm making an especially big effort in correcting my grammar? Find me a post of mine to the contrary. You've just made baseless accusations with no evidence based merely on people who post a lot. I've just pointed out your assumptions and hypocrisy in your main criteria. This thread doesn't serve anything when it's inaccurate, unless your goal is to just troll or attempt to agitate people and invite the people you obviously have a problem with postong to make even more (constructive) posts (or spam as you seem to call it). And I don't care whether I'm on the list or removed from it because it's currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion.
edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
I dont get your point or see what's the relevance of that post here? That was correcting the above user's post incorrectly blaming the source of the price drop on China when it was down to nothing but panic sellers.
And why post? Well I need to to make my case for a start, but I don't care whether I'm put on or removed from somebodies troll list, but I'm not going to just let people lie about me and not defend my inclusion when it is unjust. I'm also pointing out your hypocrisy and contradictions and this is now available for all to see so they can make their own mind up with the evidence.
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
What do you mean I'm making an especially big effort in correcting my grammar? Find me a post of mine to the contrary. You've just made baseless accusations with no evidence based merely on people who post a lot. I've just pointed out your assumptions and hypocrisy in your main criteria. This thread doesn't serve anything when it's inaccurate, unless your goal is to just troll or attempt to agitate people and invite the people you obviously have a problem with postong to make even more (constructive) posts (or spam as you seem to call it). And I don't care whether I'm on the list or removed from it because it's currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion.
edit: if you don't care, then why post here? As you said my list is " currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion."
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
What do you mean I'm making an especially big effort in correcting my grammar? Find me a post of mine to the contrary. You've just made baseless accusations with no evidence based merely on people who post a lot. I've just pointed out your assumptions and hypocrisy in your main criteria. This thread doesn't serve anything when it's inaccurate, unless your goal is to just troll or attempt to agitate people and invite the people you obviously have a problem with postong to make even more (constructive) posts (or spam as you seem to call it). And I don't care whether I'm on the list or removed from it because it's currently meaningless, incorrect and invalid and based off nothing but your own misinformed and contradictory opinion.
You are in agreement with this stand of putting me on this list.
You thus have this stand of putting me on the list, aka the spammer's list.
Hmm Yeah just be clear what spam really is according to you ..! according to me spam is creating bullshit threads with some faucet's reflink, double Threads , or anything against the Rules of forum..! other than that you can post whatever you want as long as it makes some sense and in some way or other helps . You thus have this stand of putting me on the list, aka the spammer's list.
You are in agreement with this stand of putting me on this list.
You thus have this stand of putting me on the list, aka the spammer's list.
Hmm Yeah just be clear what spam really is according to you ..! according to me spam is creating bullshit threads with some faucet's reflink, double Threads , or anything against the Rules of forum..! other than that you can post whatever you want as long as it makes some sense and in some way or other helps . You thus have this stand of putting me on the list, aka the spammer's list.
coinnewbit I never called you spammer as you said " EDIT: I am a spammer too! according to rohnearner down below "
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
So what are you trying to say? I'll happily put myself on the list too if you want that.
Ok Please do so if you are fine with it ..! and also post the total time spent..! that makes more sense..! like if you spend only an hour or less each day on this forum its obvious your post count will remain on lower side no matter how if you spam in that 1hour or post some productive stuff. and vice-verse. You thus have this stand of putting me on the list, aka the spammer's list.
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
I see you posted 33 times yesterday.
coinnewbit I never called you spammer as you said " EDIT: I am a spammer too! according to rohnearner down below "
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
So what are you trying to say? I'll happily put myself on the list too if you want that.
Ok Please do so if you are fine with it ..! and also post the total time spent..! that makes more sense..! like if you spend only an hour or less each day on this forum its obvious your post count will remain on lower side no matter how if you spam in that 1hour or post some productive stuff. and vice-verse. global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Hey guys, I have decided to collate a list of signature spammers here on bitcointalk.org
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
EDIT: My definition of spammers.
Posts are one/two liners with no real effort at proper grammar/sentence structure. Often do not add depth to discussion.
I don't know whether you're just trolling for reactions or trying to be ironic with this thread, but you might want to add yourself to that list (edit seen you already have). I find it very hypocritical of you especially given the criteria you provided as definition of spammers since you probably deserve a spot more than anyone else here. A high number of posts does not mean they're not constructive. If you look at my posts and compare them to yours you'll see mine are far longer and constructive than your usual short sentences. Further irony/hypocrisy comes from that you can't even be bothered to use proper grammar or capitalise words half of the time.
This list is usefull how?
What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
Take a look at their post history. I am pretty sure you can't make 50 constructive posts a day. But again, feel free to tell me if there are any people on this list who you think are mistakenly identified.What makes is the difference between a spammer and a very active member who posts a lot of posts (possibly mostly constructive) for you?
There are quite a few you've 'mistakenly identified' and most post far more better content than you. You seem to be making quite big assumptions here and presenting no evidence at all other than high post counts. You made nearly 10 posts in an hour today so why is 50 posts a day unreasonable? Posting 100 constructive posts a day that contribute to discussions adds more to this forum than the majority of your posts. I don't see what good this thread will do other than encourage the people who you've accused of being spammers to make even more posts.
coinnewbit I never called you spammer as you said " EDIT: I am a spammer too! according to rohnearner down below "
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
So what are you trying to say? I'll happily put myself on the list too if you want that.
Ok Please do so if you are fine with it ..! and also post the total time spent..! that makes more sense..! like if you spend only an hour or less each day on this forum its obvious your post count will remain on lower side no matter how if you spam in that 1hour or post some productive stuff. and vice-verse.
coinnewbit I never called you spammer as you said " EDIT: I am a spammer too! according to rohnearner down below "
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
I just explained you that if you can get 675POSTS in 4days why I can't get
2034POSTS in 17days.
Total Amount of time you spent on this Forum
4 days, 15 hours and 46 minutes.
Your Post Count : 675
675 Posts divided into 4days,15hours, and 46minutes =~6.08Posts/hour
Total Time I spent on this forum till now
17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes.
Total Post Count : 2034
2034 Posts divided 17 days, 9 hours and 31 minutes =~4.87Posts/hour
What other methods you are talking about .? :p tell me because the only one I know is sitting in front of PC and contributing ..! It took me 3months because I spent the amount of time here I don't want you to take is personally and judge me by the post counts I have, If you really wanna know me you can always add me on skype or other places 
..!
I'm not gonna show you how to abuse the total logged in time. I've found it somewhere on the internet a while back. ..! If that is the case, then you should re-think your life, you're spending too much of it here. Good luck.
I'm 22 and learning stuff.. I spend as much time as I can in here because i totally believe in BTC and looking forward to go big in upcoming times So what are you trying to say? I'll happily put myself on the list too if you want that.
Ok Please do so if you are fine with it ..! and also post the total time spent..! that makes more sense..! like if you spend only an hour or less each day on this forum its obvious your post count will remain on lower side no matter how if you spam in that 1hour or post some productive stuff. and vice-verse. What other methods you are talking about .? :p tell me because the only one I know is sitting in front of PC and contributing ..! It took me 3months because I spent the amount of time here I don't want you to take is personally and judge me by the post counts I have, If you really wanna know me you can always add me on skype or other places ..!
I'm not gonna show you how to abuse the total logged in time. I've found it somewhere on the internet a while back. ..! If that is the case, then you should re-think your life, you're spending too much of it here. Good luck.
So what are you trying to say? I'll happily put myself on the list too if you want that.
Ok Please do so if you are fine with it ..! and also post the total time spent..! that makes more sense..! like if you spend only an hour or less each day on this forum its obvious your post count will remain on lower side no matter how if you spam in that 1hour or post some productive stuff. and vice-verse. Jump to: