It's unfortunate that India didn't join the common action against Russia. It was obvious from the start that they wouldn't, but it's still sad. Yes, India has a lot of profit to make here, but profit on war, on blood, on what several countries and many scholars call a genocide? Is it really alright to make profit when such terrible things are done by Russia with the money it gets from selling oil?
And the EU, well, I'm not surprised that everyone is pretending that it's not Russian oil while knowing it probably is.
On multiple occasions I have asked you guys to stop blaming my country. Our position is clear. We don't support sanctions and embargoes that are imposed purely to satisfy the ego of western nations. Crude oil prices have risen by 200% during the last two years and the EU is using this as a tool for regime change. Already governments have fallen in countries such as Pakistan. If the EU want us to stop purchasing crude from Russia, then they should ask the OPEC to increase the output by 10 million barrels per day (that is the daily output from Russia).
Once again, let me make it very clear. India is not ready to foot the bill for EU's war against Russia.
Hmm ... EU war against Russia. Well, OK. Just answer honestly to this question. Suppose that it happened that India was attacked, Well, let some country XX. This country is destroying your citizens in the most sadistic way, destroying your cities. Missiles periodically arrive in Delhi, which hit residential buildings, architectural monuments, kill people .... Moreover, the country of the XX is much stronger than India, and is armed with such weapons that India cannot respond symmetrically. India is suffering huge losses, the country has lost 50% of the economy, tens of millions of lives, almost 20% of your country has been destroyed, part of it has been annexed and the XX flag is already being flown there. But for example, XX, its defense industry and army, is completely dependent on the sale of, for example, XX timber to the world market. And most of the income goes precisely to the maintenance of the shock group that kills your relatives and friends, on your own land. And you will not get out of this situation on your own, but you are guaranteed to lose. And you ask for help, and you logically ask not to finance the aggressor. The question is if all countries say: "Well, we are against not buying wood from XX. We will lose matches, toothpicks, why should we suffer so much without them? We do not support the Greenpeace war against XX." You will support such an answer, and consider it fair? Only from the heart and honestly? No need to talk about the EU. Just answer this fairly simple question?
PS. Everything in this life sooner or later, but it comes back to us like a boomerang. And good deeds, and bad, any ... Even passing by the needy, ignoring his request for help, having the opportunity to help, someday, and we will not receive critically important help for us ....