Pages:
Author

Topic: Loans in BTC - page 2. (Read 6535 times)

legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
August 24, 2014, 10:42:06 AM
#97
How do you "lend" BTC? Once the transaction is done, the other person owns the BTC.

Yes. The other person has to repay you.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
August 24, 2014, 10:05:02 AM
#96
How do you "lend" BTC? Once the transaction is done, the other person owns the BTC.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 526
August 24, 2014, 02:14:28 AM
#95
With fiat, bank loans create money out of thin air increasing the money supply thus promoting inflation. Nowadays the banks can free wheel as there is little to no requirement to hold reserves. BTC is different because lending BTC is real. None created from the loan.

Just like with gold in the 19th century, BTC banks would "create" BTC bank notes (receipts) with all ensuing consequences like bank runs and bank defaults.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
August 24, 2014, 01:36:10 AM
#94
The FDCPA is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Generally speaking fiat based loans will have more options to guarantee payment. Even signature loans for example will require a borrower to have an active checking account that money can be automatically withdrawn.

Fiat based loans also generally will require more documentation regarding a borrower's ability to repay their loans. Yes this is not something that BTC based lenders cannot do but the economy is generally not setup to do this.

Once licences come into play, I can see documentation for bitcoin users getting more cumbersome than fiat documentation.  Grin
I really don't think you need any licenses in order to lend either BTC or fiat. You just need to be sure to comply with anti-discrimination laws when lending to people.

I think the biggest challenge that lenders will have is lending to people who are potentially in another country. Having a loan agreement cross boarders is not an easy task and would likely be very expensive and difficult to enforce.
newbie
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
August 24, 2014, 01:22:45 AM
#93
Imo modern economy can live without loans and loans in Bitcoins will help current banking system to stay alive. It's not we are want, am I right?
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
August 23, 2014, 07:10:49 PM
#92
With fiat, bank loans create money out of thin air increasing the money supply thus promoting inflation. Nowadays the banks can free wheel as there is little to no requirement to hold reserves. BTC is different because lending BTC is real. None created from the loan.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
August 23, 2014, 07:08:13 PM
#91
The FDCPA is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Generally speaking fiat based loans will have more options to guarantee payment. Even signature loans for example will require a borrower to have an active checking account that money can be automatically withdrawn.

Fiat based loans also generally will require more documentation regarding a borrower's ability to repay their loans. Yes this is not something that BTC based lenders cannot do but the economy is generally not setup to do this.

Once licences come into play, I can see documentation for bitcoin users getting more cumbersome than fiat documentation.  Grin
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
August 23, 2014, 03:25:02 PM
#90
Bitcoins in my opinion is really not the right currency to be able to allow loans. I personally feel that trying anything like this with bitcoins could lead to a lot more ways to end up being scammed.

Why? It's money. BTC

You can walk away from a loan in fiat. Easy.

Lenders of fiat currency aren't protected from making bad investments by some sort of magic. They critique and analyze the data submitted by applicants for loans and verify their ID. This system would work for Bitcoin. It would work for any sort of cryptocurrency. It's just a payment method.
If a borrower was to walk away from paying a loan then the lender can sue the borrower for payment and if they win a judgment against the borrower then the lender can seize a borrower's assets. It is not possible to seize someone's bitcoin if they hold/control the private keys.

But it is still possible to put this person in jail, right? So it seems not much different from loans in fiat as long as you can reach the borrower.
The penalty for not paying a debt is not jail. Loans are a civil matter, not criminal. As long as you did not willfully deceive the lender when you took out the loan (for example by forging income documents) then you will have zero chance of jail if you don't pay a loan.

This was a metaphor. You can always make someone's life unbearable even without throwing them into a prison cell. Wink
Even this would be very difficult to do with the anon nature of bitcoin. People can and do easily use VPNs and socks5 proxies to hide their true identity and most people now are not willing to "show" their ID when taking out a loan (if they do show their ID it is likely to someone else). If you were to make someone's life hell then it would likely be for the wrong persona and regardless of it is for the right person or not you would likely be breaking debt collection laws which you can get in more trouble for then it is worth (read potential 6 figure fines due to the borrower).

I could hardly fancy anyone making a loan to an anonymous entity, whether it be in bitcoin or in fiat. Regarding making a debtor's life a hell, I didn't actually mean anything illegal. Sorry if I wasn't clear about that from the start. My point was that failing to repay the loan could entail such consequences that would make taking a loan with the purpose of not returning it an unwise decision.
The FDCPA allows for a debter to simply send a written request for the lender to cease communication and once this is received, further communication (with few exceptions) is allowed. In order to recover anything further the lender would likely need to pursue legal action which is very expensive, and even then they will only recover payment if there are assets to be recovered.

So it doesn't make much difference whether you loan in bitcoin or in fiat, correct? Also FDCPA (don't even know what it stands for) requirements are only valid for one country. Other countries may have other regulating bodies apparently with different requirements.
The FDCPA is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Generally speaking fiat based loans will have more options to guarantee payment. Even signature loans for example will require a borrower to have an active checking account that money can be automatically withdrawn.

Fiat based loans also generally will require more documentation regarding a borrower's ability to repay their loans. Yes this is not something that BTC based lenders cannot do but the economy is generally not setup to do this.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
August 23, 2014, 08:17:21 AM
#89
If FIAT doesnt exist how is people suposed to do business without loans?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 526
August 23, 2014, 07:16:17 AM
#88
Bitcoins in my opinion is really not the right currency to be able to allow loans. I personally feel that trying anything like this with bitcoins could lead to a lot more ways to end up being scammed.

Why? It's money. BTC

You can walk away from a loan in fiat. Easy.

Lenders of fiat currency aren't protected from making bad investments by some sort of magic. They critique and analyze the data submitted by applicants for loans and verify their ID. This system would work for Bitcoin. It would work for any sort of cryptocurrency. It's just a payment method.
If a borrower was to walk away from paying a loan then the lender can sue the borrower for payment and if they win a judgment against the borrower then the lender can seize a borrower's assets. It is not possible to seize someone's bitcoin if they hold/control the private keys.

But it is still possible to put this person in jail, right? So it seems not much different from loans in fiat as long as you can reach the borrower.
The penalty for not paying a debt is not jail. Loans are a civil matter, not criminal. As long as you did not willfully deceive the lender when you took out the loan (for example by forging income documents) then you will have zero chance of jail if you don't pay a loan.

This was a metaphor. You can always make someone's life unbearable even without throwing them into a prison cell. Wink
Even this would be very difficult to do with the anon nature of bitcoin. People can and do easily use VPNs and socks5 proxies to hide their true identity and most people now are not willing to "show" their ID when taking out a loan (if they do show their ID it is likely to someone else). If you were to make someone's life hell then it would likely be for the wrong persona and regardless of it is for the right person or not you would likely be breaking debt collection laws which you can get in more trouble for then it is worth (read potential 6 figure fines due to the borrower).

I could hardly fancy anyone making a loan to an anonymous entity, whether it be in bitcoin or in fiat. Regarding making a debtor's life a hell, I didn't actually mean anything illegal. Sorry if I wasn't clear about that from the start. My point was that failing to repay the loan could entail such consequences that would make taking a loan with the purpose of not returning it an unwise decision.
The FDCPA allows for a debter to simply send a written request for the lender to cease communication and once this is received, further communication (with few exceptions) is allowed. In order to recover anything further the lender would likely need to pursue legal action which is very expensive, and even then they will only recover payment if there are assets to be recovered.

So it doesn't make much difference whether you loan in bitcoin or in fiat, correct? Also FDCPA (don't even know what it stands for) requirements are only valid for one country. Other countries may have other regulating bodies apparently with different requirements.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
August 23, 2014, 07:10:56 AM
#87
bitcoin is not the right currency for loans.

I don't know if another alt currency would work or not, but any bitcoin loans would have to take place outside the blockchain and be done by contract.

I don't want BTC to replace fiat anyway, but rather compliment it.

I agree with your post. BTC should be complimented with Fiat, not arch enemies as some people make out on this forum. BTC has a lot of great upsides and so does fiat, so why not use both of them instead of making out as if only one can be used?

I personally think by combining both Fiat which offers offline use and Bitcoin which offers online user and it's benefits, then we have an even more advanced and powerful economical opportunity worldwide.

Correct. Fiat cannot be replaced completely.
At least, not until taxes have to be paid in fiat. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
August 23, 2014, 05:03:34 AM
#86
bitcoin is not the right currency for loans.

I don't know if another alt currency would work or not, but any bitcoin loans would have to take place outside the blockchain and be done by contract.

I don't want BTC to replace fiat anyway, but rather compliment it.

Yeah but what if a person wants to start a business and what not and has no spare BTC? How can an economy work without loans? Of course, that is if it doesnt replace FIAT which I think its impossible.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
August 22, 2014, 11:37:23 PM
#85
Bitcoins in my opinion is really not the right currency to be able to allow loans. I personally feel that trying anything like this with bitcoins could lead to a lot more ways to end up being scammed.

Why? It's money. BTC

You can walk away from a loan in fiat. Easy.

Lenders of fiat currency aren't protected from making bad investments by some sort of magic. They critique and analyze the data submitted by applicants for loans and verify their ID. This system would work for Bitcoin. It would work for any sort of cryptocurrency. It's just a payment method.
If a borrower was to walk away from paying a loan then the lender can sue the borrower for payment and if they win a judgment against the borrower then the lender can seize a borrower's assets. It is not possible to seize someone's bitcoin if they hold/control the private keys.

But it is still possible to put this person in jail, right? So it seems not much different from loans in fiat as long as you can reach the borrower.
The penalty for not paying a debt is not jail. Loans are a civil matter, not criminal. As long as you did not willfully deceive the lender when you took out the loan (for example by forging income documents) then you will have zero chance of jail if you don't pay a loan.

This was a metaphor. You can always make someone's life unbearable even without throwing them into a prison cell. Wink
Even this would be very difficult to do with the anon nature of bitcoin. People can and do easily use VPNs and socks5 proxies to hide their true identity and most people now are not willing to "show" their ID when taking out a loan (if they do show their ID it is likely to someone else). If you were to make someone's life hell then it would likely be for the wrong persona and regardless of it is for the right person or not you would likely be breaking debt collection laws which you can get in more trouble for then it is worth (read potential 6 figure fines due to the borrower).

I could hardly fancy anyone making a loan to an anonymous entity, whether it be in bitcoin or in fiat. Regarding making a debtor's life a hell, I didn't actually mean anything illegal. Sorry if I wasn't clear about that from the start. My point was that failing to repay the loan could entail such consequences that would make taking a loan with the purpose of not returning it an unwise decision.
The FDCPA allows for a debter to simply send a written request for the lender to cease communication and once this is received, further communication (with few exceptions) is allowed. In order to recover anything further the lender would likely need to pursue legal action which is very expensive, and even then they will only recover payment if there are assets to be recovered.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 526
August 21, 2014, 03:28:57 PM
#84
Bitcoins in my opinion is really not the right currency to be able to allow loans. I personally feel that trying anything like this with bitcoins could lead to a lot more ways to end up being scammed.

Why? It's money. BTC

You can walk away from a loan in fiat. Easy.

Lenders of fiat currency aren't protected from making bad investments by some sort of magic. They critique and analyze the data submitted by applicants for loans and verify their ID. This system would work for Bitcoin. It would work for any sort of cryptocurrency. It's just a payment method.
If a borrower was to walk away from paying a loan then the lender can sue the borrower for payment and if they win a judgment against the borrower then the lender can seize a borrower's assets. It is not possible to seize someone's bitcoin if they hold/control the private keys.

But it is still possible to put this person in jail, right? So it seems not much different from loans in fiat as long as you can reach the borrower.
The penalty for not paying a debt is not jail. Loans are a civil matter, not criminal. As long as you did not willfully deceive the lender when you took out the loan (for example by forging income documents) then you will have zero chance of jail if you don't pay a loan.

This was a metaphor. You can always make someone's life unbearable even without throwing them into a prison cell. Wink
Even this would be very difficult to do with the anon nature of bitcoin. People can and do easily use VPNs and socks5 proxies to hide their true identity and most people now are not willing to "show" their ID when taking out a loan (if they do show their ID it is likely to someone else). If you were to make someone's life hell then it would likely be for the wrong persona and regardless of it is for the right person or not you would likely be breaking debt collection laws which you can get in more trouble for then it is worth (read potential 6 figure fines due to the borrower).

I could hardly fancy anyone making a loan to an anonymous entity, whether it be in bitcoin or in fiat. Regarding making a debtor's life a hell, I didn't actually mean anything illegal. Sorry if I wasn't clear about that from the start. My point was that failing to repay the loan could entail such consequences that would make taking a loan with the purpose of not returning it an unwise decision.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 21, 2014, 12:34:36 PM
#83
bitcoin is not the right currency for loans.

I don't know if another alt currency would work or not, but any bitcoin loans would have to take place outside the blockchain and be done by contract.

I don't want BTC to replace fiat anyway, but rather compliment it.
There are companies that gives out loan in BTC, try btcjam.com
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
August 21, 2014, 12:29:09 PM
#82
BTC loans will be successful for big orders if the final amount to be paid is in BTC[not dollars] since for big amounts slight variation in market value can cause big profit/loss.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
August 21, 2014, 09:19:47 AM
#81
I think it is possible that loans could work on a contract basis where identification is required to be confirmed. Only way to make it work but there is still the problem of fake ids. Loans have no backing in any real organization. A loan of 1 btc could change over time (ex. Its 600 when given, 500 when its due) in value.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
August 14, 2014, 09:14:52 PM
#80
The price of housing is artificially high because of the whole credit industry.

Before mortgages, you'd have people building their own houses on land they claimed as their own. A homestead. So I think in an ideal world we'd go back to that sort of thing, or something completely new.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4WmDoYJhnk

I certainly don't want loans in bitcoin, unless they're non-interest loans - that's where the monetary oppression in the world comes from.

in some areas the price of housing isn't very much at all. in places like cleveland, buffalo, chicago, you can get like a 4bed 2bath house for $30k. but then in boston the same house is 2.3 million  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
August 14, 2014, 09:04:31 PM
#79
I guess the problem is trust with BTC as well as controlability.
Since everything is so anonymous it's hard to force someone to do something.
This is also why scams happen more with BTC then with most / any other currency.

For example: with Paypal you can dispute a transaction, with bitcoin you can't.
This way I lost 0.17 BTC myself when trying to exchange it to Paypal
This is a very big reason why it is not safe to use paypal period. But it is especially not safe to use paypal with bitcoin. Not only is it possible to have a PP transaction reversed if you are dealing with the legit owner of the account, but paypal accounts are notorious for getting hacked and when they do, whoever money was sent to by these stolen paypal accounts would be on the hook for the money that was sent them.
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
August 14, 2014, 09:02:07 PM
#78
Bitcoins in my opinion is really not the right currency to be able to allow loans. I personally feel that trying anything like this with bitcoins could lead to a lot more ways to end up being scammed.

Why? It's money. BTC

You can walk away from a loan in fiat. Easy.

Lenders of fiat currency aren't protected from making bad investments by some sort of magic. They critique and analyze the data submitted by applicants for loans and verify their ID. This system would work for Bitcoin. It would work for any sort of cryptocurrency. It's just a payment method.
If a borrower was to walk away from paying a loan then the lender can sue the borrower for payment and if they win a judgment against the borrower then the lender can seize a borrower's assets. It is not possible to seize someone's bitcoin if they hold/control the private keys.

But it is still possible to put this person in jail, right? So it seems not much different from loans in fiat as long as you can reach the borrower.
The penalty for not paying a debt is not jail. Loans are a civil matter, not criminal. As long as you did not willfully deceive the lender when you took out the loan (for example by forging income documents) then you will have zero chance of jail if you don't pay a loan.

This was a metaphor. You can always make someone's life unbearable even without throwing them into a prison cell. Wink
Even this would be very difficult to do with the anon nature of bitcoin. People can and do easily use VPNs and socks5 proxies to hide their true identity and most people now are not willing to "show" their ID when taking out a loan (if they do show their ID it is likely to someone else). If you were to make someone's life hell then it would likely be for the wrong persona and regardless of it is for the right person or not you would likely be breaking debt collection laws which you can get in more trouble for then it is worth (read potential 6 figure fines due to the borrower).
Pages:
Jump to: