Pages:
Author

Topic: Loans in BTC - page 4. (Read 6507 times)

legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
August 03, 2014, 05:53:25 AM
#57

Both sides of balance sheet is expanded.   Read this article it explains more correctly than the posters here

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100497710

Aah... Thought so.
Many people have misunderstood the leveraging bit.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
August 03, 2014, 02:03:32 AM
#56


From an accounting point of view, if they create 1000 loans for every 100 deposit, what is the liability corresponding to the loan of 1000 (which appears on the asset side)?

Both sides of balance sheet is expanded.   Read this article it explains more correctly than the posters here

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100497710
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
'Slow and steady wins the race'
August 03, 2014, 01:55:50 AM
#55
Incorrect.

If that were true we wouldn't have such an extreme increase in the money supply, national debt, and inflation. The way the Fed and banks in the US works is this:

Person A deposits 100. The bank then creates on book 900 to use for loans and credit=1000 Bam, money created out of thin air.

The banks do this for every deposit that is made, and new money is created "on book" for the additional 9/10s of the fractional reserve rule. This is what results in the highly compounding increase in the money supply. In reality, the actual physical money supply that exists couldn't even pay off the interest on the outstanding national debt.

From an accounting point of view, if they create 1000 loans for every 100 deposit, what is the liability corresponding to the loan of 1000 (which appears on the asset side)?
Banks can leverage their equity in a 10:1 ratio. For every $1 their customers have on deposit, a bank will have a liability of $1.00. For every $1 that the bank loans, the bank will have $1 in assets (before accounting for loan loss protection).
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
August 03, 2014, 01:19:02 AM
#54
Incorrect.

If that were true we wouldn't have such an extreme increase in the money supply, national debt, and inflation. The way the Fed and banks in the US works is this:

Person A deposits 100. The bank then creates on book 900 to use for loans and credit=1000 Bam, money created out of thin air.

The banks do this for every deposit that is made, and new money is created "on book" for the additional 9/10s of the fractional reserve rule. This is what results in the highly compounding increase in the money supply. In reality, the actual physical money supply that exists couldn't even pay off the interest on the outstanding national debt.

From an accounting point of view, if they create 1000 loans for every 100 deposit, what is the liability corresponding to the loan of 1000 (which appears on the asset side)?
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
August 02, 2014, 09:12:56 PM
#53
There is no reason why fractional reserve banking could not be done with bitcoins. After all, it existed when the U.S. was on the Gold Standard.
It can't be done with bitcoin, because you cannot produce more bitcoins like you can dollar bills...And when the banks have to fufill the loan, they will have to send actual bitcoins to fund the loan....

Person A deposits 100 BTC. The bank A loans 90 BTC to person B.
Person B deposits 90 BTC. The bank B loans 81 BTC to person C.
Person C deposits 81 BTC. The bank C loans 72 BTC to person D.
Person D deposits 72 BTC. ...

Total apparent number of bitcoins in the system: 1000

That's classic fractional reserve banking and it works with dollars, bitcoins, gold, or seashells.

Incorrect.

If that were true we wouldn't have such an extreme increase in the money supply, national debt, and inflation. The way the Fed and banks in the US works is this:

Person A deposits 100. The bank then creates on book 900 to use for loans and credit=1000 Bam, money created out of thin air.

The banks do this for every deposit that is made, and new money is created "on book" for the additional 9/10s of the fractional reserve rule. This is what results in the highly compounding increase in the money supply. In reality, the actual physical money supply that exists couldn't even pay off the interest on the outstanding national debt.
hero member
Activity: 988
Merit: 1000
August 02, 2014, 06:22:29 PM
#52
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

I lend btc on there . I have made a few loans and have been burned once. You can choose to borrow with btc pegged to US dollar or not. As a lender you determine if you want to lend to a pegged loan or not. Reputation loans are a quick turnaround. Some borrowers will do multiple rep builders. After 1-3 loans with a quick payback seem to be the safest for later loans.

Reading what happened in the past in the loan section of the forum, I would never risk a loan with my precious bitcoins.
The probability to be scammed is high and the revenues are too little, I'll stay away from that business.
You need to require collateral to be safe lending BTC on the lending subforum. It is also generally safe to lend small amounts to users who have established accounts (full members or higher) with neutral trust as long as the amount lent is less then what can be made in a month at the lowest paying signature campaign for ~50-100 posts as your could get a trusted member to negative trust someone that defaults on a loan.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 260
July 26, 2014, 04:36:35 AM
#51
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

I lend btc on there . I have made a few loans and have been burned once. You can choose to borrow with btc pegged to US dollar or not. As a lender you determine if you want to lend to a pegged loan or not. Reputation loans are a quick turnaround. Some borrowers will do multiple rep builders. After 1-3 loans with a quick payback seem to be the safest for later loans.

Reading what happened in the past in the loan section of the forum, I would never risk a loan with my precious bitcoins.
The probability to be scammed is high and the revenues are too little, I'll stay away from that business.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Knowledge its everything
July 26, 2014, 01:58:52 AM
#50
I think loans in BTC is very risky  Sad
people can just get the BTC and run away
expect you know them in real life  Smiley

BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

I lend btc on there . I have made a few loans and have been burned once. You can choose to borrow with btc pegged to US dollar or not. As a lender you determine if you want to lend to a pegged loan or not. Reputation loans are a quick turnaround. Some borrowers will do multiple rep builders. After 1-3 loans with a quick payback seem to be the safest for later loans.

I think it's still risky
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
'Slow and steady wins the race'
July 22, 2014, 03:33:18 PM
#49
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

I lend btc on there . I have made a few loans and have been burned once. You can choose to borrow with btc pegged to US dollar or not. As a lender you determine if you want to lend to a pegged loan or not. Reputation loans are a quick turnaround. Some borrowers will do multiple rep builders. After 1-3 loans with a quick payback seem to be the safest for later loans.
Rep loans don't have any purpose other then to gain trust of the community and to make their risk profile look better. I argue that these kinds of loans are very unethical.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
July 21, 2014, 11:43:54 PM
#48
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

I lend btc on there . I have made a few loans and have been burned once. You can choose to borrow with btc pegged to US dollar or not. As a lender you determine if you want to lend to a pegged loan or not. Reputation loans are a quick turnaround. Some borrowers will do multiple rep builders. After 1-3 loans with a quick payback seem to be the safest for later loans.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
July 21, 2014, 11:37:10 PM
#47
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...
btc jam is very similar to sites like prosper except that prosper will hire a collection agency for you while btcjam will make you collect yourself if the borrower doesn't pay

I looked into them and they are quite similar to the Prosper model. I made some money with Prosper but I am much more risk averse about my bit coin than I am about fiat currency.
I am in the same boat as you. Another concern of mine is that most of my money that I made from Prosper was from loans made at the height of the financial crisis when interest rates were spiking even for credit worthy borrowers and the economy was in the tank, I was lucky that the economy recovered, allowing my borrowers to mostly pay back their high interest rate loans in full.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
July 21, 2014, 09:36:57 AM
#46
Safello explores problems and possibilities with bitcoin P2P lending. https://blog.safello.com/index.php/2014/07/21/bitcoin-peer-peer-lending/
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
July 20, 2014, 06:08:33 PM
#45
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...
btc jam is very similar to sites like prosper except that prosper will hire a collection agency for you while btcjam will make you collect yourself if the borrower doesn't pay

I looked into them and they are quite similar to the Prosper model. I made some money with Prosper but I am much more risk averse about my bit coin than I am about fiat currency.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
July 20, 2014, 05:14:20 PM
#44
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...
btc jam is very similar to sites like prosper except that prosper will hire a collection agency for you while btcjam will make you collect yourself if the borrower doesn't pay
hero member
Activity: 661
Merit: 502
July 20, 2014, 12:42:08 PM
#43
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

Thats the most important thing in loaning BTC. What would happen if you lend $30 worth BTC and after 90 days you get not $33, but instead you get $23.

I loan you $30 in BTC.
After 90 days you pay me $31 in BTC.

Obviously the lender would have been better off holding the coins and probably made more profit if the price had gone up but I think pegging the price to USD is more attractive as I don't think anyone wants to end up in a situation where they borrow say 10 BTC and suddenly the price increases by 10x leaving the borrower stuck.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 100
July 20, 2014, 12:06:07 PM
#42
bitcoin is not the right currency for loans.

I don't know if another alt currency would work or not, but any bitcoin loans would have to take place outside the blockchain and be done by contract.

I don't want BTC to replace fiat anyway, but rather compliment it.

I also think that any loans in bitcoin are risky. btc is a non-reversible currency by nature. If someone does not want to return the loan, what are you going to do?



Take their collateral

Gold isn't particularly reversible either, but there was a time when all loans were denominated in gold.
If someone were to be able to give up collateral in exchange for a loan then why would they need the loan in the first place?

WTF?

Because they want money but they don't want to give up their asset permanently, obviously? Because they want to buy something else? You know, the reason for any loan ever? Just with a limit equal to the borrowers total equity?

Moreover why would a person take A loan if he had money in his account to be reversed away in the case of non payment???
When most people take out loans that are secured by collateral the collateral is something that is not liquid and something that is used on a regular basis, like a car for example.

The collateral used in BTC loans is liquid (can easily be converted into BTC otherwise it would not be accepted) and the collateral is not used by the borrower - it is generally held by escrow. In essence borrowers are giving up control of cash in exchange for different cash and they need to repay the lender plus interest.

There would be no reason why the borrower couldn't simply sell the collateral then repurchase when they would be able to repay the loan instead of borrowing and paying interest
full member
Activity: 271
Merit: 100
July 20, 2014, 08:21:06 AM
#41
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.

Thats the most important thing in loaning BTC. What would happen if you lend $30 worth BTC and after 90 days you get not $33, but instead you get $23.
hero member
Activity: 661
Merit: 502
July 20, 2014, 08:02:21 AM
#40
BTCjam.com has been doing loans in BTC for awhile where people can do peer to peer lending.   I have never tried it before, and I was just reading how someone made off with a bunch of investor money...but that is always the risk of lending...

Thing is BTCJam only does soft credit checking, it's not actually pulling regulated information to asses someone's risk when being loaned money. If BTCJam teamed up with someone like Experian who offer business services they could reduce a lot of time spent checking IDs, get a more reliable credit score and they even include debt recovery.

The downside to this is that people will bad credit will never be able to get a loan, even if they really can afford to pay it back.

Also the BTC would have to be pegged to USD to avoid problems with fluctuation.
full member
Activity: 271
Merit: 100
July 20, 2014, 05:22:08 AM
#39
Well if you want there is a site Btcjam loaning, but you should lend your bitcoins to people that confirmed their identify.

People give about +0.5% so if you want to make $10 in 90 days after lending you should lend someone $2000 worth of BTC.

Its $2000 BTC risk for $10 in 90 days. Thats pretty awful since there can be a guy that comes back after 90 days and says that his plan didnt work out and he lost his btc.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 18, 2014, 02:43:40 PM
#38
Loans for bitcoins wouldn't work very well, considering once something is sent, it is sent permanently. Unless bitcoin is accepted as a currency and regulated (which we don't want it regulated), then loans wouldn't really work out. At least without proper collateral. 
Loans can work without collateral, but in order for BTC loans to be enforced, there must be fiat still in use that can be seized by the courts to pay the creditor in the event the borrower defaults on his loan. It is obviously not possible to seize a borrower's bitcoin assets without his private keys.

You can seize all non-bitcoin assets. Not just fiat currency.
Pages:
Jump to: