Longest Winning Streak in a Dice Game

stigmacryptonight

member

Activity: 574

Merit: 13

Quote from: Darker45 on August 05, 2019, 08:56:21 AM

By the way, more often than not I bet on a 50% winning chance.

Very difficult actually betting with a 50% chance. If you do it by winning 9 times in a row, I can say it's great and lucky.

I can't play the dice with a 50% chance of winning, it will definitely be even higher. Because luck sometimes does not come to me.

robelneo

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1225

Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

Quote from: Darker45 on August 05, 2019, 08:56:21 AM

My record has finally been broken today!

I have made 9 consecutive wins in my rolls today! I am already amazed even though I have very low bets.

But I am curious about your records. How many consecutive wins have you made in a dice game?

By the way, more often than not I bet on a 50% winning chance.

Mine 10 also low bet I have an awful experience, where I have 7 consecutive wins with low bets and pour everything in my 8th roll thinking it's my lucky day and I can still win with just one more roll, but unfortunately, the 8th roll kills my hope, everything is lost, since then I am very careful not to pour everything in one bet.

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3514

Merit: 2246

🌀 Cosmic Casino

Quote from: asayoyaasa on August 20, 2019, 02:33:55 AM

I made 10 consecutive win bet at 49% chance in dice game just today (image below). But my longest winning streak is around 16 or 17, I switch between over and under several times, following my guts.
~img

Congrats! Although you won around $0.01 with all those 10 greens because you were betting with Crown, 10 consecutive wins on 49% always feels good.

My longest winning streak also was around 16 or 17, and like you I too didn't win big overall because I was betting with just 100 sats. And I too like to switch between over and under although knowing well that it doesn't change a thing regarding the outcome.

spadormie

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 268

Quote from: panjul07 on August 19, 2019, 04:01:20 PM

Simple, because it is the most well known strategy as well as the easiest strategy to implement. This strategy existed long time ago before we know about dice game, because it came from math logical thinking by doubling bet on every lose may get us a win eventually.

What is the probability of winning with you? I mean, what is the probability are you using? Is it 50% or a custom probability?

Quote from: emberbekas on August 20, 2019, 04:13:24 AM

Quote from: 1982dre on August 19, 2019, 12:24:37 PM

Quote from: spadormie on August 19, 2019, 11:39:32 AM

Quote from: Indamuck on August 19, 2019, 10:20:25 AM

I've seen some 15+ streaks of losses before. These streaks is what makes the martingale strategy a technique that won't be viable in the long run. Gamblers think they can make their money back when they keep doubling up but eventually they will reach one of those nasty losing streaks.

I don't know why most people in here are using the martingale strategy. Yes, it's quite a strat but I can't see it as a strategy that will help you cope up your loses. After all gambling is like a game, you need to adjust whenever you feel like it. And when you feel like winning, you can just all in and win.

Well almost everyone starting with dice tried that strategy and they are cured after the first long red streak . I still don't like the part to wager a lot to just win the first loss back.

Yes, doubled our bet amounts just to chase our first loss seems so weird but people do it most of the time. The risk is quite bigger for small amount we want to get back. It is for sure that martingale isn't the good method to be used especially for long playing.

I think martingale is good when the probability of winning is 50%. I noticed also that when you are in a streaking red, you can always come back anytime soon in green. Not always that accurate but sometimes it is.

emberbekas

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1000

Quote from: 1982dre on August 19, 2019, 12:24:37 PM

Quote from: spadormie on August 19, 2019, 11:39:32 AM

Quote from: Indamuck on August 19, 2019, 10:20:25 AM

I've seen some 15+ streaks of losses before. These streaks is what makes the martingale strategy a technique that won't be viable in the long run. Gamblers think they can make their money back when they keep doubling up but eventually they will reach one of those nasty losing streaks.

I don't know why most people in here are using the martingale strategy. Yes, it's quite a strat but I can't see it as a strategy that will help you cope up your loses. After all gambling is like a game, you need to adjust whenever you feel like it. And when you feel like winning, you can just all in and win.

Well almost everyone starting with dice tried that strategy and they are cured after the first long red streak . I still don't like the part to wager a lot to just win the first loss back.

Yes, doubled our bet amounts just to chase our first loss seems so weird but people do it most of the time. The risk is quite bigger for small amount we want to get back. It is for sure that martingale isn't the good method to be used especially for long playing.

asayoyaasa

copper member

Activity: 648

Merit: 159

I made 10 consecutive win bet at 49% chance in dice game just today (image below). But my longest winning streak is around 16 or 17, I switch between over and under several times, following my guts.

michellee

hero member

Activity: 2604

Merit: 816

🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino

Quote from: panjul07 on August 19, 2019, 04:01:20 PM

Quote from: michellee on August 18, 2019, 10:11:53 PM

Quote from: numanoid on August 18, 2019, 10:33:39 AM

Quote from: felicita on August 18, 2019, 08:35:49 AM

i think my biggest roll win uintil now was on just-dice it was about 40 rolls in a row just green.
I was at 885 win chance Grin

regards

Hmm 885% win chance? Tell me please which site you have played with 885% win chance, so i will stay away from them since all of my bet will lose (even the highest win chance on dice is 98% (1.0012 multipler)) if more than 100% it's mean the multipler is below than 1x.
How about mine? I was getting 40+ winning streaks on 95% win chance. (I only compared mine and him, i knew this thread discussing about 2x multipler)

.

I guess he doesn't mention about %, he was at 885 win chance, I am not sure about what he wants to tell us, but I guess he wants to tell about he get 885 times of win so far.

He already mentions the site is just-dice.com, I don't play at that site, so I don't know, maybe in that time, he is very lucky to get that longest winning streak but you can to try to calculate how big the percentage at this site: https://www.omnicalculator.com/statistics/odds

He did say that he get 40 rolls in a row with 885 win chance while at the same time win chance is something related to percentage so he might be trying to say 88.5% (he missed the . IMO) like what is pointed out by Betwrong. I don't think he got 885 winning streak, even if he used the lowest risk such as 98% winning chance then it is still hard to reach that long streak unless he is very lucky player.

Ah, yes, you are right, I am wrong. He could get 88.5% as you say because to get 885 win chance is impossible although it is possible if his luck is following him Grin

40 rolls in the green would be a big winning for him, especially if he used the big amount as the bet. I am curious about how much he gets in those gambling games because he doesn't tell us.

numanoid

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1148

Quote from: iMark on August 19, 2019, 09:59:21 AM

9 times a winning streak is quite long, if you are consistent with use large capital and big odds, then the profit that you will get will certainly be very large. Long winning streak will certainly be difficult if you use a small chance of win, like 50% of win, and use martingale, instead you can lose in several rows

Doing martingale only will be profitable if you using 2x or higher than that, it's mean you will get profit only playing at 49.5% - below than that. If you are using martingale on higher win chance, you still can't cover your losses before when you have red streaks losses. (Better not to use martingale though)

Quote from: spadormie on August 19, 2019, 11:39:32 AM

And when you feel like winning, you can just all in and win.

Sometimes even you feel like you will win, you will lose all of your balance

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: michellee on August 18, 2019, 10:11:53 PM

Quote from: numanoid on August 18, 2019, 10:33:39 AM

Quote from: felicita on August 18, 2019, 08:35:49 AM

i think my biggest roll win uintil now was on just-dice it was about 40 rolls in a row just green.
I was at 885 win chance Grin

regards

Hmm 885% win chance? Tell me please which site you have played with 885% win chance, so i will stay away from them since all of my bet will lose (even the highest win chance on dice is 98% (1.0012 multipler)) if more than 100% it's mean the multipler is below than 1x.
How about mine? I was getting 40+ winning streaks on 95% win chance. (I only compared mine and him, i knew this thread discussing about 2x multipler)

.

I guess he doesn't mention about %, he was at 885 win chance, I am not sure about what he wants to tell us, but I guess he wants to tell about he get 885 times of win so far.

He already mentions the site is just-dice.com, I don't play at that site, so I don't know, maybe in that time, he is very lucky to get that longest winning streak but you can to try to calculate how big the percentage at this site: https://www.omnicalculator.com/statistics/odds

He did say that he get 40 rolls in a row with 885 win chance while at the same time win chance is something related to percentage so he might be trying to say 88.5% (he missed the . IMO) like what is pointed out by Betwrong. I don't think he got 885 winning streak, even if he used the lowest risk such as 98% winning chance then it is still hard to reach that long streak unless he is very lucky player.

Quote from: spadormie on August 19, 2019, 11:39:32 AM

Quote from: Indamuck on August 19, 2019, 10:20:25 AM

I've seen some 15+ streaks of losses before. These streaks is what makes the martingale strategy a technique that won't be viable in the long run. Gamblers think they can make their money back when they keep doubling up but eventually they will reach one of those nasty losing streaks.

I don't know why most people in here are using the martingale strategy. Yes, it's quite a strat but I can't see it as a strategy that will help you cope up your loses. After all gambling is like a game, you need to adjust whenever you feel like it. And when you feel like winning, you can just all in and win.

Simple, because it is the most well known strategy as well as the easiest strategy to implement. This strategy existed long time ago before we know about dice game, because it came from math logical thinking by doubling bet on every lose may get us a win eventually.

1982dre

hero member

Activity: 1372

Merit: 512

Quote from: spadormie on August 19, 2019, 11:39:32 AM

Quote from: Indamuck on August 19, 2019, 10:20:25 AM

I've seen some 15+ streaks of losses before. These streaks is what makes the martingale strategy a technique that won't be viable in the long run. Gamblers think they can make their money back when they keep doubling up but eventually they will reach one of those nasty losing streaks.

I don't know why most people in here are using the martingale strategy. Yes, it's quite a strat but I can't see it as a strategy that will help you cope up your loses. After all gambling is like a game, you need to adjust whenever you feel like it. And when you feel like winning, you can just all in and win.

Well almost everyone starting with dice tried that strategy and they are cured after the first long red streak . I still don't like the part to wager a lot to just win the first loss back.

spadormie

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 268

Quote from: Indamuck on August 19, 2019, 10:20:25 AM

I've seen some 15+ streaks of losses before. These streaks is what makes the martingale strategy a technique that won't be viable in the long run. Gamblers think they can make their money back when they keep doubling up but eventually they will reach one of those nasty losing streaks.

I don't know why most people in here are using the martingale strategy. Yes, it's quite a strat but I can't see it as a strategy that will help you cope up your loses. After all gambling is like a game, you need to adjust whenever you feel like it. And when you feel like winning, you can just all in and win.

Indamuck

hero member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 554

I've seen some 15+ streaks of losses before. These streaks is what makes the martingale strategy a technique that won't be viable in the long run. Gamblers think they can make their money back when they keep doubling up but eventually they will reach one of those nasty losing streaks.

iMark

sr. member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 251

Quote from: rdluffy on August 17, 2019, 07:13:59 AM

Coincidence here, my longest streak was 9 in dice game

But a sad stuff here, I already have 14 lose dices in a row trying the martingale method Grin

9 times a winning streak is quite long, if you are consistent with use large capital and big odds, then the profit that you will get will certainly be very large. Long winning streak will certainly be difficult if you use a small chance of win, like 50% of win, and use martingale, instead you can lose in several rows

spadormie

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 268

Quote from: Darker45 on August 05, 2019, 08:56:21 AM

But I am curious about your records. How many consecutive wins have you made in a dice game?

By the way, more often than not I bet on a 50% winning chance.

The most consecutive wins I got in a dice game is 15 wins plus I only bet on a 50% winning chance. I like the idea of that actually. It's good for me and I think it compensates for my playstyle in gambling. You know gambling techniques. After that 15 winning streak it's all over I can only get 2-3 winning streaks then cut off.

I even made awesome win on that though. I got $50 just for that.

janggernaut

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 1131

Quote from: michellee on August 18, 2019, 10:11:53 PM

I guess he doesn't mention about %, he was at 885 win chance, I am not sure about what he wants to tell us, but I guess he wants to tell about he get 885 times of win so far.

That's impossible to get 885 streak winnings in a row, even with highest win chance. I don't know but it seems he is still newbie from gambling site as you can see from history post from him.

Justdice is a good site, try to search "investor vs nakowa" on youtube

michellee

hero member

Activity: 2604

Merit: 816

🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino

Quote from: numanoid on August 18, 2019, 10:33:39 AM

Quote from: felicita on August 18, 2019, 08:35:49 AM

i think my biggest roll win uintil now was on just-dice it was about 40 rolls in a row just green.
I was at 885 win chance Grin

regards

Hmm 885% win chance? Tell me please which site you have played with 885% win chance, so i will stay away from them since all of my bet will lose (even the highest win chance on dice is 98% (1.0012 multipler)) if more than 100% it's mean the multipler is below than 1x.
How about mine? I was getting 40+ winning streaks on 95% win chance. (I only compared mine and him, i knew this thread discussing about 2x multipler)

.

I guess he doesn't mention about %, he was at 885 win chance, I am not sure about what he wants to tell us, but I guess he wants to tell about he get 885 times of win so far.

He already mentions the site is just-dice.com, I don't play at that site, so I don't know, maybe in that time, he is very lucky to get that longest winning streak but you can to try to calculate how big the percentage at this site: https://www.omnicalculator.com/statistics/odds

Golftech

hero member

Activity: 2128

Merit: 520

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hmn, I remembered my longest winning streaks at 8 at 80% chance of win. It all depends on the percent chance of wins, you set it at 98% chance then the longer streak you will experience but the less profits you will gain. Lol. And for thr 50% chance 4-5 greens are the longest for me. It is better if we just bet at a minimum bets if we are in a higher multiplier or lower chance of winning.

There's relevance with the winning chance that you'll going to pick to enjoy longer winning streak but with 49.5% chance, it's really a lucky straight winnings when you have more than 5 greens, if you'll be able to maximize your chance of earnings from that streak, quitting away with good
amount of winnings would be an enjoyable experienced all along.

numanoid

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1148

Quote from: felicita on August 18, 2019, 08:35:49 AM

i think my biggest roll win uintil now was on just-dice it was about 40 rolls in a row just green.
I was at 885 win chance Grin

regards

Hmm 885% win chance? Tell me please which site you have played with 885% win chance, so i will stay away from them since all of my bet will lose (even the highest win chance on dice is 98% (1.0012 multipler)) if more than 100% it's mean the multipler is below than 1x.
How about mine? I was getting 40+ winning streaks on 95% win chance. (I only compared mine and him, i knew this thread discussing about 2x multipler)

.

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3514

Merit: 2246

🌀 Cosmic Casino

Quote from: felicita on August 18, 2019, 08:35:49 AM

i think my biggest roll win uintil now was on just-dice it was about 40 rolls in a row just green.
I was at 885 win chance Grin

~

This thread is about betting with 49.50% or 50% win chance. If you'd hit a winning streak of 40 greens with that win chance that would be really remarkable, but I assume you are talking about 88.50% win chance. For this win chance 40 greens in a row is nothing special. Well, it's a lucky streak, no doubt about that, but it's comparable to 5 wins in a row at 50% win chance.

felicita

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1031

i think my biggest roll win uintil now was on just-dice it was about 40 rolls in a row just green.
I was at 885 win chance Grin

regards

Topic: Longest Winning Streak in a Dice Game (Read 855 times)