Low allocation bounty pools pays easily? - page 6.

AliMan

hero member

Activity: 1974

Merit: 502

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: gabbie2010 on November 09, 2019, 10:19:23 AM

Bounty hunters are easily carried away by fake juicy allocation for bounty pools thus get involved in promoting those projects at the end its either the huge token paid is worthless after listing in an exchange or non payment to the participants, I believed this is another factor to be consider when choosing a bounty campaign, low bounty allocation worth doing at least payment is guaranteed a proverb says 'a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush'

In relation to OP's opinion over Ferrum's allocation for bounty participants, they've rewarded their hunters successfully, However I am not at ease with the allocations given to participants, since the market value for each FRM was too cheap at $0.006; yet it won't be called profitable because of the reasons that it took several months to finish the campaign. Most hunters were too emotional upon seeing the actual value of their rewards. Much better to have small bounty allocations that has huge market value; rather than promoting huge rewards with a centavo value during trading.

Kersh768

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 256

Freshdice.com

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Not all the time because the distribution of the reqards depends on the project and the project manager which has no relation with the amount of token allocation. There are projects which has large token allocation but are paying on time, as what was stated in their website, and vice versa. So more likely, it is a case to case basis and generalization will just result to false information. Better choose a project with good reputation.

masterrex

full member

Activity: 1820

Merit: 107

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

I agree as i experience it also, mostly of those low allocation bounties was paid earlier compare to those larger allocation bounties i don't know whats the real reason behind it. or maybe because its just a small amount and cannot do any negative effects on the project as a whole and i hope that it would be more equal in terms of bounty allocation in regards to the bounty duration.

gabbie2010

sr. member

Activity: 2842

Merit: 326

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Bounty hunters are easily carried away by fake juicy allocation for bounty pools thus get involved in promoting those projects at the end its either the huge token paid is worthless after listing in an exchange or non payment to the participants, I believed this is another factor to be consider when choosing a bounty campaign, low bounty allocation worth doing at least payment is guaranteed a proverb says 'a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush'

romanij

full member

Activity: 882

Merit: 100

You need to understand that now the bounty program is like a casino. In most cases, you can see how to cheat the investors and the bounty hunters. Nothing will protect us from this-neither the analysis of the project, nor the observation of whitepepper. Therefore, there is no difference in what kind of reward Fund the team offers. Now the most important thing is that the project would not be a fake and you did not waste your time in vain. Try to take more projects and conduct statistics.

awakpane

member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 12

In my opinion, your opinion is also true. lately there are many low-allocation prize campaigns that get paid for bounties. because their sales quickly reach the set target. but there is also a prize campaign that has a high allocation of funds, but also directly gets payments to hunter participants.

memed97

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 101

Quote from: Ken_terrance on November 09, 2019, 04:47:54 AM

Many failed bounties i knew of have low bounty allocations like highest if 500k, so why did they fail? lack of investors or just useless project idea? you can't judge bounties with the rewards they offer bounty hunters, if you do you will miss out

Assessment of the allocation of bounty is very necessary to look at, because now there are so many bounty whose allocation is small but the duration is very long, so it will not be in accordance with the work time that will be used by each participant of the bounty.

joseyphil82

member

Activity: 742

Merit: 16

It matters and it doesn't matters sometimes, yes its true that scammers use big bounty rewards to impress bounty hunters so they can promote the scam project for them but at the same time i have seen bounties with low rewards that still end up scamming investors, its vice versa

Lauren Smith

sr. member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 277

No, it makes no difference. Why would it make a difference? They get the token for free they pay nothing for it. It doesn't matter how much they say they will pay it matters if you going to be paid and the allocation amount has nothing to do with it. Please explain yourself im curious to your thinking.

bitcampaign

sr. member

Activity: 1918

Merit: 268

20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

bounty distribution is usually in the calculation of the dollar for example the amount of distribution of 50k dollars, so they calculate the price of ICO not on the price on the exchange actively, currently there is no bounty that looks attractive even large distribution is just a formality to attract many people, so not only see the amount low distribution that really pays even there are some cases those who distribute low can also run away

imutlinda

sr. member

Activity: 926

Merit: 256

Quote from: GunsLair on November 09, 2019, 05:40:12 AM

Indeed, the distribution of the fund, large or small, is not an indicator of the guarantee of payments. There were a lot of such projects that had small funds. And many didn't pay anything in the end. The success of the project and the support of the community, as well as the relevance of the product are important here.

for now I think the allocation of funds is not that interesting, so it's better to see the platform's advantages and the community's interest in the project. and also the level of popularity of the developer which sometimes makes people interested

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

I am someone who has participated in at least 20-25 different bounty campaigns over the last three years. IMO, having a low bounty allocation is not a guarantee for receiving tokens. From my personal experience, I would say that such campaigns are equally risky as those who have higher allocation. It depends on the concept, team and bounty manager. Allocation is not that important as far as I know.

barnes13

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 521

7enius - Your Cryptocurrency Marketing Consultant

It shouldn't be like this. But more precisely this is talking about commitment. If they are committed then they have planned all matters relating to bounties or other marketing to be allocated appropriately and delivered on time. But the problem here is that many of them often change the terms of the bounty. For example, a bounty that should run for only 4 weeks, extended to 8 weeks without additional funding allocation. Then another example of a reward that should be distributed tomorrow, may change for up to 2 months. Actions like this are said to be not commitment and can leave a bad impression for the project.

GunsLair

jr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 1

Indeed, the distribution of the fund, large or small, is not an indicator of the guarantee of payments. There were a lot of such projects that had small funds. And many didn't pay anything in the end. The success of the project and the support of the community, as well as the relevance of the product are important here.

Moore234

copper member

Activity: 547

Merit: 0

Low allocation bounty pools pays easily. I have participated in a bounty project, the allocation was $5k and it was trading. Just before the end of the bounty they had a tokensale event and the price of each coin skyrocket making the bounty allocation x10 of the initial allocation. The bm came up with unnecessary rules , looking for faults in hunters. Some high allocation bounty even lock up the reward for up to 3 to 6 months. Low allocation is the best it's makes the team to pay easily.

Ken_terrance

member

Activity: 574

Merit: 18

Making Smart Money Work

Many failed bounties i knew of have low bounty allocations like highest if 500k, so why did they fail? lack of investors or just useless project idea? you can't judge bounties with the rewards they offer bounty hunters, if you do you will miss out

dimox

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

easy paid is not connect with how much bounty allocation. i ever join some campaign with high allocation and easy paid, and vice versa. its about team progress.

Quote from: huu78 on November 08, 2019, 10:08:24 PM

It is true that a small allocation always pays the participants of the campaign. Most major allocation is fraud because it promises to be too big and it will hurt investors someday.
So a great opportunity to pay is on a small allocation though because it can be in logic with the brain that if it is too much to gift the forum it will harm investors.

not all ico give fraud when they promise with high allocation, but some of them will did it

DDante

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 19

Bounties that has low budget allocations mean business, they care about the success project and they have already analyzed everything very well, either softcap met or hardcap met successful they will always pay hunters but low allocations still doesn't clear the fact that they aren't scam either

Eugenar

sr. member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 278

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

In the first place, paying bounty is not the concrete indication of a project being successful. If a project is paying their hunters it doesn't mean they've reached their goal. On the other hand, bounty not paying their hunters on time is also not an indication of a bounty being scam. The point is, bounty's success is based on the roadmap achievement on time by the projects who run the bounty.

tenakha

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 509

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Yeah, that is the truth lately. Good projects are confident and allocate small amounts to bounty, and participants are essentially limited. But, this does not mean that all bounties that allocate small amounts are the best. Also, projects that specify a bigger amount in bounty topic essentially distribute the reward less when they collect the expected money. So it is best to investigate the project itself, not the amount specified in the bounty.

Topic: Low allocation bounty pools pays easily? - page 6. (Read 1998 times)