Low allocation bounty pools pays easily? - page 8.

Google+

hero member

Activity: 2464

Merit: 550

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Goodvalony on November 08, 2019, 02:34:18 PM

you are right at your point. Any bounty with a huge allocation is probably a scam or will not pay hunters. most campaigns resort to change the token allocation towards the end of the bounty. some due extend the bounty period without increasing the initial allocation. while many project have the habit of delaying payments until hunters has forgotten about the bounty. Most cases, i do blame campaign managers for this mess.
they failed to uphold their integrity because they will get paid at the end of the project maybe in eth or btc.

I don't think it has any effect because if a bounty campaign has a good project and can make investors interested, the allocation of many or little bounty campaigns will still be paid, it all depends on the project developer who can make the project useful or not.

xiboothrezi

sr. member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 285

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

--------
It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Not like that, man. The allocation of the bounty pool does not affect the bounty reward distribution. Low allocation, many participants, that means you will get a small reward too, right? it doesn't matter if the project is really good and promising. But if there are projects with many allocations and promises, will you just skip it for fear of the delayed and long distribution process?
It seems you have to change your mindset. Being a bounty hunter requires proper analysis and calculation, all risks are your responsibility because you have chosen to join so don't blame anyone if something is not in line with your expectations. We must become educated bounty hunters. Don't make allocation as the main reference, but the quality of the project must also be considered. Don't just judge from one aspect.

Goodvalony

member

Activity: 616

Merit: 16

you are right at your point. Any bounty with a huge allocation is probably a scam or will not pay hunters. most campaigns resort to change the token allocation towards the end of the bounty. some due extend the bounty period without increasing the initial allocation. while many project have the habit of delaying payments until hunters has forgotten about the bounty. Most cases, i do blame campaign managers for this mess.
they failed to uphold their integrity because they will get paid at the end of the project maybe in eth or btc.

Perfect35

member

Activity: 854

Merit: 10

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Well, you might be right. It also sometimes comes faster than expected, compared to how slow project teams find it difficult to pay these days.
On the other hand, there are still some projects with large allocations, who still pay on time, but the ratio is usually very pow, when compared to those with small allocations and whose projects succeeded.

Silberman

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1338

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

To begin with any allocation to bounty hunters that is given in fiat is useless, we know that tokens will vary in price wildly after they enter the market so if you are interested in bounty campaigns you need to see how big is the percentage they are allocating to bounty hunters compared to the total supply, anything bigger than 1% of the coins most likely means they do not have the intention of paying the bounty hunters or that they want to generate as much as hype as possible only to disappear later with the money of investors.

ven7net

full member

Activity: 1946

Merit: 112

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

I believe that the point is not that the smaller the pool, the better they pay, the project team itself plays a big role and how much money the project raised. Often, projects draw a large amount of the pool and collect enough, but do not want to pay, because they believe that it is too much money for the participants of the bounty. In order for the admins to be honest and fulfill their conditions before the bounty participants, then everything will be fine.

Darktongue

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Ferrum is good project, I'm following this campaign. They didn't pay easily as you think, distributed token by sperate three months. I think all projects distribution is perfect done before if distribution complete before listed. After listed they worry about price drop.

VDraci

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 28

SAPG Pre-Sale Live on Uniswap!

The highest bounty reward that is good on my own list is 400k bounty reward, i think shitcoins are the ones that try to lure bounty hunters by all means to promote bounty projects, they give fake bounty allocations that they can never pay or impossible to achieve

Ken_terrance

member

Activity: 574

Merit: 18

Making Smart Money Work

You are right, every bounties that have low allocations seem more serious in development and success of the project that the projects that offers bounty hunters too high bounty allocations

leavolnhals

full member

Activity: 770

Merit: 101

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

It is not really a problem at the pool. because for the bad and high failure projects, they try to set a high pool level to attract more bounty hunters to join and when it succeeds, the project owner will feel sorry and do not want to pay the token .
For potential and highly successful projects, they only offer a reasonable and reasonable pool level. That's why good projects pay very quickly.

gensol

jr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 3

I doubt if allocation pool is the problem with bounty payout. Projects who decide to pay, pay at the end of the campaign those who don't decide to pay never pays its a decision on the part of project owners.

aomakun

sr. member

Activity: 1020

Merit: 253

JangaCams.com

Quote from: Sendi blackspade team on November 08, 2019, 09:28:13 AM

to be honest, now I don't even see the allocation for bounty payments. when the project has a product that is running and developed, even with a small application I will follow it. nothing is certain in the crypto market. even though we joined the bounty campaign which provided a large allocation, in many cases what we received did not meet our expectations. price reductions when distribution and allocation cuts can make us disappointed if we take that into account.

The dump occurs repeatedly for new projects at the beginning of the list exchanger. I don't think big allocations can help the revenue generated, because most of the prices are dumped on the market. at the moment I don't see many projects that pay enough money for bounty participants

Obito

sr. member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 293

Quote from: Doranile432 on November 08, 2019, 06:03:06 AM

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Pools are easy to attained and it doesn't need to be alot of investors not even those known investors. Sometimes the project members itself is the one who produce money and thus make the project running. No doubt about that because they can afford. On the other hand, benefits are small depending on how much hyped they will be in the market.

Sendi blackspade team

full member

Activity: 941

Merit: 100

to be honest, now I don't even see the allocation for bounty payments. when the project has a product that is running and developed, even with a small application I will follow it. nothing is certain in the crypto market. even though we joined the bounty campaign which provided a large allocation, in many cases what we received did not meet our expectations. price reductions when distribution and allocation cuts can make us disappointed if we take that into account.

Apes

sr. member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 257

The low bounty allocation prize is indeed preferred by developers, this consideration is because this expenditure does not impose future project costs. But it would be nice if they issued or allocated a minimum of 10% of their hardcap for bounty prize, the bounties hunter also want to enjoy the success as they do. Because without bounty hunters they project were nothing.

Ararbermas

sr. member

Activity: 2016

Merit: 283

Yes i agree that those who have low allocations is the only one who can pay hunters easily . Because mostly project that have big allocations are scam wherein they use fake amount of allocations for bounty just to convince hunters to participate and to intimidate joining with with low allocations. Very obvious strategy actually because they want to stay on the top always while others are staying below,, so that they can scam investors or hunters easily.

Palider

hero member

Activity: 1273

Merit: 507

Yes, It's easy to pay because their allocation is low and it doesn't affect them very much. But this will not be the basis for knowing that a project is truly legit. Because it may be one of their ways to deceive bounty hunters especially investors. This is similar to the bounties I have been to before, I was paid but this is a token of no value and has been abandoned by the developers.

evenotto

member

Activity: 672

Merit: 12

There are a lot of facts for payment of tokens and their subsequent sale on the exchange - honesty of BM, number of participants, amount of money collected on IEO, and so on..

DaMut

sr. member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 263

A bounty that offers us $100,000 as its bounty pools has a seriousness in developing their project other than a bounty that offers you $1,000,000 as its bounty pool(in this year, we are not talking about the good old days in 2017). I have experienced it once before, a low allocation bounty cares about their investors and the project more than the big one. That was why they were giving a reasonable price to do marketing, unlike some projects that do not care how their investors feeling and trying to go all out using marketing to increase the price of the project.

OasisDre

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 41

You have a point that most coins that promises million dollars wortg of tokens ends up a shitcoin but its almost same thing with bounties that have low allocations as well, some of them turn scammed or refused to pay bounty hunters as well but better than high reward bounties

Topic: Low allocation bounty pools pays easily? - page 8. (Read 1998 times)