Topic: LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] (NOW IN DESCENDING ORDER) (Read 3773 times)
November 30, 2020, 03:41:56 PM
Bump
June 25, 2020, 10:39:40 AM
The weekly DT update is a good example of how an update each week is sufficient.
Good point, I can keep weekly snapshots. But for now, it's still not working correctly, and I haven't had the time to figure it out exactly. 
June 24, 2020, 09:41:35 PM
I now have hundreds of daily snapshots, so you can see who supported which Flag when. Does anyone even use that, or can I just keep at most monthly snapshots?
I think your question has been answered through a lack of an answer - I don't feel that people place that great an importance on who did what, when to the minute. The weekly DT update is a good example of how an update each week is sufficient. The only people who would need such information on a minute by minute basis are those either trying to garner support for or against a fresh flag.
The novelty wears off after a while.
June 08, 2020, 03:58:50 PM
My Trust Flag viewer is currently (a bit) broken, it doesn't update all Flags anymore. I need some time to fix this.
Considering the large number (around 2000) of Flags, I'll also stop scraping all Flags daily, and instead scrape the older Flags less often.
I'll update here when it works properly again.
Question: should I keep all older records? I now have hundreds of daily snapshots, so you can see who supported which Flag when. Does anyone even use that, or can I just keep at most monthly snapshots?
Considering the large number (around 2000) of Flags, I'll also stop scraping all Flags daily, and instead scrape the older Flags less often.
I'll update here when it works properly again.
Question: should I keep all older records? I now have hundreds of daily snapshots, so you can see who supported which Flag when. Does anyone even use that, or can I just keep at most monthly snapshots?
February 07, 2020, 03:21:22 PM
Bumping this 
Please review a few Flags once in a while, if you can spare the time. It doesn't matter whether or not you're on DT (that might change depending on how others value your judgement).
Once in a while something fails scraping: if the file size is out of order, just skip that one. I only leave them in for the navigation to keep working (and never bothered to build in a check). Please review a few Flags once in a while, if you can spare the time. It doesn't matter whether or not you're on DT (that might change depending on how others value your judgement). January 24, 2020, 02:52:41 AM
Improvement:
New: (Support | Oppose)
Because of Flag spammers, I've added quick links to (Support | Oppose) Flags.
Because of Flag spammers, I've added quick links to (Support | Oppose) Flags.
January 22, 2020, 11:47:27 AM
Make sense 😉
There you go, have it your way:New: Descending order
Starting January 22, 2020, my Trust Flag viewer is now in descending order (newest Flags first).
Starting January 22, 2020, my Trust Flag viewer is now in descending order (newest Flags first).
Allow me to use this opportunity to promote Add comments to Flags on LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer. Example:
Quote
2020-01-22 Wed 13.07h
source: loyce.club
*** Steamtyme commented: Flag lacks proper reference.
*** dragonvslinux commented: Corrected reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52774268
884 Insufficient support. Lauda flagged dragonvslinux (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TheUltraElite. Opposed by nutildah, eddie13, Last of the V8s, Steamtyme, Timelord2067, dragonvslinux.
The comments should be under the Flags, but I messed up the BBCode when I changed the order. This should be fixed in the next version. source: loyce.club
*** Steamtyme commented: Flag lacks proper reference.
*** dragonvslinux commented: Corrected reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52774268
884 Insufficient support. Lauda flagged dragonvslinux (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TheUltraElite. Opposed by nutildah, eddie13, Last of the V8s, Steamtyme, Timelord2067, dragonvslinux.
January 21, 2020, 08:55:25 AM
I don't mind scrolling down, but the page gets slower to load now.
Quote
Re: LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates]
Make sense 😉 January 21, 2020, 07:43:48 AM
I wonder what took a too long to have this in mind for you. 😉
I don't mind scrolling down, but the page gets slower to load now. January 21, 2020, 07:39:38 AM
A descending order will be nice. That way we can start looking from the latest flag.
I'll think about it when the list gets much longer. January 20, 2020, 02:53:41 AM
A descending order will be nice. That way we can start looking from the latest flag.
I'll think about it when the list gets much longer. December 30, 2019, 07:53:33 AM
I could be wrong but early today when I imported data from loyce.club, I felt the speed is lower than before.
I don't think the current hosting is slower. However, I do notice downloads start "slow", then gain speed a bit later. As if the servers are still negotiating how fast their connection is:Code:
wget -O /dev/null http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt
--2019-12-30 06:48:15-- http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt
Resolving loyce.club (loyce.club)... 44.230.10.13
Connecting to loyce.club (loyce.club)|44.230.10.13|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 13339707 (13M) [text/plain]
Saving to: '/dev/null'
100%[============================================================================================================================================================>] 13,339,707 8.46MB/s in 1.5s
2019-12-30 06:48:17 (8.46 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [13339707/13339707]
I did notice directories with 10,000 files load a bit slower, maybe because I switched from Nginx to Apache. I could install Nginx, but I'm still not even done with restoring all services.
December 30, 2019, 07:41:49 AM
I could be wrong but early today when I imported data from loyce.club, I felt the speed is lower than before. Is it exactly what happened with your club?
December 30, 2019, 07:12:35 AM
Due to server changes, the banned-status in my Trust Flag viewer wasn't working in the last few updates. It'll be fixed in the next update.
October 17, 2019, 10:27:31 AM
At the risk of talking to myself a bit:
I have suggested before that I can allow users to add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, but haven't had any feedback to this.
I made this:New: Add comments to Trust Flags
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.
You can now add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, see Post here to add comments to LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer.
October 17, 2019, 09:26:14 AM
Thanks for the clarification...
Neither do I - in part the reason not to support the flag.
Quote
~ is a duplicate of a previous (still active) flag
I don't really get why LFC_Bitcoin uses my topic on scammer BetKing.io as a reference topic for a Flag on game-protect. October 17, 2019, 06:46:44 AM
It's quite likely other flags have non valid reference links.
When I wrote about Flags that don't have a valid Reference link, I meant "not valid" from a webbrowser's perspective: The link doesn't exist (anymore).The description on my Trust Flag viewer is better: "Reference topic does not exist".
Many Flags have a Reference link with invalid content, but I can't highlight those without doing it manually.
I have suggested before that I can allow users to add comments to my Trust Flag viewer, but haven't had any feedback to this.
Quote
~ is a duplicate of a previous (still active) flag
I don't really get why LFC_Bitcoin uses my topic on scammer BetKing.io as a reference topic for a Flag on game-protect. October 16, 2019, 10:18:01 PM
Update: I'm now highlighting all Flags that don't have a valid Reference link:
To reduce scraping, I won't re-check all Reference topics each day, so there it could take a while to update after a Reference topic gets trashed.
These Flags are currenly involved:
Reference topic does not exist:
...
To reduce scraping, I won't re-check all Reference topics each day, so there it could take a while to update after a Reference topic gets trashed.
These Flags are currenly involved:
Reference topic does not exist:
...
I've referenced in these two threads that the reference threads were either not created by the flag creator, or, do not reference to the person who is the topic of the flag (hence are not valid reference threads)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/100-of-quicksellers-flags-are-false-5165940
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lauda-creating-flags-against-random-people-linked-to-threads-not-related-5161689 <-- this thread needs updating as the person involved has recommenced creating flags against users, however the flag recipient usually aren't the subject of the thread in most cases.
It's quite likely other flags have non valid reference links.
*edit*
Have just recalled this flag is a duplicate of a previous (still active) flag - essentially double dipping / double jeopardy... The creator of the second flag has modified their OP that many times (and even references the first flag) bullying anyone [1] [2] who opposes the flag they created.
October 12, 2019, 09:44:20 AM
For the first time, Flags have been removed! They'll show in the next update.
I've changed the wording: instead of "No such flag", my Trust Flag viewer now shows "This Flag has been deleted by the Bitcointalk forum administration".Currently:
Quote
October 07, 2019, 04:00:52 AM
Quote continued:
Quote
351 Insufficient support. korner flagged penek (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by anatolikostis, korner, Alex LZ Saver, tet8. Opposed by Foxpup, suchmoon, diks, xandry, yogg, kzv, Last of the V8s, TheFuzzStone, MaoChao, xtraelv, witcher_sense, madnessteat, FontSeli, VyachikO.
352 Insufficient support. korner flagged leo99 (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by korner. Opposed by Foxpup, suchmoon, diks, xandry, yogg, Last of the V8s, TheFuzzStone, MaoChao, madnessteat, FontSeli, VyachikO.
420 Insufficient support. korner flagged babo (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by korner. Opposed by Foxpup, suchmoon, babo, xandry, Lafu, Last of the V8s, mosprognoz[/size].
421 Insufficient support. reckon flagged Veleor (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, reckon, exp0it. Opposed by Foxpup, suchmoon, Lafu, Last of the V8s, micgoossens, witcher_sense, Alex_Sr, DireWolfM14[/size].
429 Active. Sat0shisGhost flagged Ak2loose (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by owlcatz, ezeminer, micgoossens, teeGUMES, bavicrypto, ChiBitCTy, Sat0shisGhost, tweetious. Opposed by nobody.
442 Active. DdmrDdmr flagged andrewpane (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by DdmrDdmr. Opposed by nobody.
457 Active. Bthd flaggedAdrianne99 Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Bthd. Opposed by nobody.
474 Active. bones261 flagged criptoflex (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by bones261, xtraelv, Royse777, bitmover, YOSHIE, pakhitheboss, dantee1. Opposed by CryptAssist, Travelflex[/size].
499 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Vadi2323 (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by xandry, FontSeli, johhnyUA, LVL F, Ratimov.
511 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged chimk (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by suchmoon, diks, xandry, Xal0lex, Veleor, witcher_sense, Alex_Sr, taikuri13, madnessteat, FontSeli, peloso, Inspector Deck, jokers10, DabLjat.
518 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flaggedmarkiz73 Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by xandry, TheFuzzStone, FontSeli[/size].
530 Active. TryNinja flaggedsashkazh12 Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by TryNinja, micgoossens, sabotag3x, alegotardo, Alveus. Opposed by nobody.
532 Active. TryNinja flaggedIRIshAN Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by TryNinja, micgoossens, bitmover, sabotag3x, Loganota, alegotardo, Alveus. Opposed by nobody.
540 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged iExchangeOfficial (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by Krypt0nite, iExchangeOfficial[/size].
541 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged nimogsm (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by nobody.
542 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged TheFuzzStone (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by diks, xandry, FontSeli, Vladsav.
543 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged johhnyUA (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by xandry, witcher_sense, CryptopreneurBrainboss, FontSeli, johhnyUA, Ratimov.
544 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Utorg (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by xandry, Utorg.
554 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Veleor (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by suchmoon, xandry, LoyceV, DireWolfM14, FontSeli, johhnyUA.
556 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged xandry (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by xandry, Xal0lex, FontSeli, Ratimov.
560 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Xal0lex (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by xandry, FontSeli, Ratimov.
561 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged WEX-OFFICIAL (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, tet8, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
562 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged LiveCoin (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
563 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Vadi2323 (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by actmyname, FontSeli, SmashDestroy, Ratimov.
564 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Exmoney (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver. Opposed by nobody.
565 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged btc-e.com (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
566 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged ne0n (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
567 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged WME (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
568 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged penek (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
569 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Balthazar (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
570 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged LZ (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by FontSeli, Ratimov.
571 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flaggedZloy Banned! (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
572 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Lex Voland (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
573 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged wex.link (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
574 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged ya-just (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
575 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Already exist (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Alex LZ Saver, exp0it. Opposed by nobody.
591 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged TheFuzzStone (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by exp0it. Opposed by suchmoon, diks, xandry, chimk, Veleor, madnessteat, FontSeli, Ratimov, Vladsav.
593 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged Veleor (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by EVg98, exp0it. Opposed by suchmoon, LoyceV, nutildah, chimk, madnessteat, DireWolfM14, Ratimov.
594 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged madnessteat (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by exp0it. Opposed by suchmoon, diks, chimk, madnessteat, Ratimov.
595 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged Inspector Deck (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by exp0it. Opposed by suchmoon, diks, chimk, Vadi2323, Inspector Deck, Ratimov.
596 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged Ratimov (type 3,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by exp0it. Opposed by suchmoon, diks, xandry, chimk, Veleor, madnessteat, lovesmayfamilis, peloso, Inspector Deck, Ratimov.
650 Active. CryptopreneurBrainboss flagged hyipxmonitor (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by TheNewAnon135246, LFC_Bitcoin, bones261, examplens, pandukelana2712, tvplus006, CryptopreneurBrainboss, avikz, aioc, s0lidus. Opposed by nobody.
656 Active. morvillz7z flagged petersonmintuio (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Pamoldar, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, mr.relax. Opposed by nobody.
665 Insufficient support. lighpulsar07 flaggedWinAlready Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by lighpulsar07. Opposed by nobody.
672 Insufficient support. headcutter flagged o_e_l_e_o (type 2,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by headcutter. Opposed by Foxpup, o_e_l_e_o, Bitcoin_Arena[/size].
673 Insufficient support. headcutter flagged Bitcoin_Arena (type 2,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by headcutter. Opposed by Foxpup, o_e_l_e_o, lighpulsar07.
680 Active. dkbit98 flaggedJesusFuck Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by dkbit98. Opposed by nobody.
681 Active. dkbit98 flaggedLuadaIsMyFather Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by dkbit98. Opposed by nobody.
683 Active. dkbit98 flaggedJusticeForAll Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by dkbit98. Opposed by nobody.
687 Insufficient support. mgtowcoin flaggediCryp2o Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by mgtowcoin. Opposed by nobody.
738 Active. dkbit98 flagged KIRHMEER (type 1,see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by dkbit98. Opposed by nobody.
811 Active. sandy-is-fine flaggedKlewzixGC Banned! (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by sandy-is-fine. Opposed by nobody.
352 Insufficient support. korner flagged leo99 (type 1,
420 Insufficient support. korner flagged babo (type 1,
421 Insufficient support. reckon flagged Veleor (type 1,
429 Active. Sat0shisGhost flagged Ak2loose (type 1,
442 Active. DdmrDdmr flagged andrewpane (type 1,
457 Active. Bthd flagged
474 Active. bones261 flagged criptoflex (type 1,
499 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Vadi2323 (type 1,
511 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged chimk (type 1,
518 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged
530 Active. TryNinja flagged
532 Active. TryNinja flagged
540 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged iExchangeOfficial (type 1,
541 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged nimogsm (type 1,
542 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged TheFuzzStone (type 1,
543 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged johhnyUA (type 1,
544 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Utorg (type 1,
554 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Veleor (type 3,
556 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged xandry (type 3,
560 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Xal0lex (type 3,
561 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged WEX-OFFICIAL (type 3,
562 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged LiveCoin (type 3,
563 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Vadi2323 (type 3,
564 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Exmoney (type 3,
565 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged btc-e.com (type 3,
566 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged ne0n (type 3,
567 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged WME (type 3,
568 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged penek (type 3,
569 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Balthazar (type 3,
570 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged LZ (type 3,
571 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged
572 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Lex Voland (type 3,
573 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged wex.link (type 3,
574 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged ya-just (type 3,
575 Insufficient support. Alex LZ Saver flagged Already exist (type 3,
591 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged TheFuzzStone (type 3,
593 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged Veleor (type 3,
594 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged madnessteat (type 3,
595 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged Inspector Deck (type 3,
596 Insufficient support. exp0it flagged Ratimov (type 3,
650 Active. CryptopreneurBrainboss flagged hyipxmonitor (type 1,
656 Active. morvillz7z flagged petersonmintuio (type 1,
665 Insufficient support. lighpulsar07 flagged
672 Insufficient support. headcutter flagged o_e_l_e_o (type 2,
673 Insufficient support. headcutter flagged Bitcoin_Arena (type 2,
680 Active. dkbit98 flagged
681 Active. dkbit98 flagged
683 Active. dkbit98 flagged
687 Insufficient support. mgtowcoin flagged
738 Active. dkbit98 flagged KIRHMEER (type 1,
811 Active. sandy-is-fine flagged
Jump to: