Topic: Add comments to Flags on LoyceV's Trust Flag viewer (Read 1324 times)

15 month bump

Something didn't work anymore, and it took longer than expected to fix. It's still on my list.

Is there a http://loyce.club/trust/flags/396.html ?? the last one (395) was on the 2020-06-18 Thu 03.18h around a similar time as your bump.

Flag 1179: Bitcoin SV: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-bitcoin-sv-bsv-fake-team-member-and-plagiarized-white-paper-5149062
Flag 1180: fraudulent: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitmex-research-vs-craig-wright-fraud-faketoshi-5193158
Flag 1181: flag abuser: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinsv-creating-vexatious-and-invalid-flags-5215743

Flag 1194: Thank you, BSV, for showing how scared you are to have your scam exposed. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinsv-creating-vexatious-and-invalid-flags-5215743
Flag 1195: Thank you, BSV, for showing how scared you are to have your scam exposed. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinsv-creating-vexatious-and-invalid-flags-5215743
Flag 1196: Thank you, BSV, for showing how scared you are to have your scam exposed. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinsv-creating-vexatious-and-invalid-flags-5215743

I showed all lines for each Flag, which lead to duplicates. I see the irony now
I've removed duplicate lines from my post.

The Flag types differ, so they don't get an automated comment.

added a comment in your name to Flag 109, but not to Flag 60. It's better not to quote "Flag: number" comments in this topic

Might be a glitch, but it shows 716 twice instead of 716 and 717

---

Flag 712: @bobitza , @ChuckBuck , @Enre , @JollyGood , @RBF , @rhomelmabini , @robelneo , @sabotag3x , @ScamViruS are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53951875 (03/Mar/2020)

Flag 1260: @AlexSimion , @joksim299 , @nullius , @TheUltraElite , @TMAN , are supporting a fake flag created by Lauda: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53951875 (03/Mar/2020)

Duplicate Flags:

• Have the same Flag type (1, 2 or 3)
• Accuse the same user
• Use the same Reference link

It doesn't matter who created the Flag.

Automatic detection
I've automated duplicate Flag detection:
There's one limitation: it shows the duplicates from the previous update, so it lags behind one day.
Note that the list in this post won't be updated.

Example

Flag 60: Flag 109 is exactly the same as Flag 60.
Flag 109: Flag 109 is exactly the same as Flag 60.
Flag 1264: The Reference topic has been deleted, see http://loyce.club/archive/topics/521/5219092.html for the unedited posts.

You can use one post to comment on many Flags.

However, I'm still working on migrating data to another server, so if it doesn't show up instantly, just wait a few days

Flag 47: Creator of Flag has locked thread therefore disqualifying the Flag.
Flag 89: goose20 inactive since 15 April 2018, 16:01:40 - Now 22/12/2019
Flag 90:  inactive since 08 June 2018, 03:58:06 - Now 26/12/2019
Flag 91: xetsr inactive since 22 August 2016, 16:39:17 - Now 28/02/2020
Flag 102: The level one has been superseded by Flag 539 which was started by the victim of the scam.
Flag 108: accused is not mentioned in the OP or on the first page. (At all??)
Flag 692: Two other flags (Flag 716 and 717) have been created citing this flag's thread as proof.
Flag 712: whoeier starts a scam accusation against four users in 2018.  Much later, Lauda creates just one flag against jamalaezaz, but not against other three. Five days after thread started (8th January 2018) whoeier updates the OP and writes that "Iam2Good( also represented Visale ) and myself have found an solution to this. In my opinion this is resolved." so Flag should be withdrawn by Lauda as the issue was resolved a year before flags were created.  Lauda was a part of thread and therefore aware of this in 2018. See ref: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lauda-creating-flags-against-random-people-linked-to-threads-not-related-5161689
Flag 716: Flags 716 and 717 are linked to the same thread that Flag 692 uses.
Flag 717: Flags 716 and 717 are linked to the same thread that Flag 692 uses.
Flag 922: Flag 922 is a duplicate of flag 827
Flag 1220: Accused User hacker1001101001 is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser - Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 1412: Accused User hacker1001101001 is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser as having committed an indictable offence. The accuser did not create the thread - Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 1413: Accused User poochpocket is not mentioned in the OP or first page by the accuser as the accuser did not create the thread - Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 1916: is a duplicate of Flag 1911 and is therefore invalid.
Flag 1936: The accused is not mentioned in the OP of the Flag thread (and the accuser is not the OP) - The Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 2113: The flag links to a thread that does not make any accusations against the accused.  The Flag is therefore invalid.
Flag 2809: Flag created in a self moderate thread started by another user.  Flag therefore does not meet the basic criterion for flag creation. https://ninjastic.space/post/57827808

Updated 01^th/Sep/2021

---

Same with 435, hence my opposition to it.

Flag 372: Flag 435 is exactly the same as Flag 372.
Flag 435: Flag 435 is exactly the same as Flag 372.

Flag 886: Flag lacks proper reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52832048
Flag 709: Flag lacks proper reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52832048

Flag 884: Flag lacks proper reference.

Please follow the correct format, otherwise you'll your post will be ignored by my scraper.

Flag 49: An opposition reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/feedback-5164879

Nice work, cheers for adapting things.

After some small changes, URLs should be okay now. They'll show up as clear text.

Update: It shows this:
Starting from the next update, I'll fix this (by removing everything after the first double quotation mark).

Flag 884: Corrected reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52774268

Reserved (and I can't really delete it because the original post was Merited).

In June this year, I created LoyceV's (Personal) Trust Flag viewer [daily updates] in Meta:

This topic allows anyone to add comments to Flags (in my Flag viewer, not on the actual forum Flags).

Format (use this format!):
Flag 9: This is a test-comment.
(don't quote other users who posted this)

Result (source):


Your comment should show up in the next update. I create an update once a day.
I keep daily snapshots, so even after editing or removing a comment, older versions are preserved.  

Feel free to discuss this here too, anything without the correct format will (or should.....) be ignored by my scraper.

Restrictions

• Only the first 200 characters of each comment are shown.
• Only one comment per Flag per user (if you post more than one comment for the same Flag, only the first comment will be shown).
• You can add a new post or edit an existing post to add more comments. I scrape all posts in this topic once a day to update my Trust Flag viewer.
• Currently, it's sorted using the same order as this topic. If this becomes popular, I might change this (for instance: show the Flag creator's comment first, then the Accused user's comment, then all others).
• You can delete a comment to have it removed from my next update.

Self-moderated
Don't try to break this, it's barely tested. If anything goes wrong, please post.
Don't try to abuse this. I don't want to make a blacklist, but I will if I have to.
English only (after all, this is an English board).
Don't add HTML tags or smileys.
I don't want to censor this, but please refrain from using foul language, and stick to the facts. Other users can add new comments to go with your comment if needed.

---

---

See [overview] LoyceV's useful data on Bitcointalk for more of my forum-related topics