Topic: [LTC][0% fees] lite.coin-pool.com ~800 mhash - A stable pool, all miners welcome - page 4. (Read 5508 times)

The last block, payouts look good and worked auto-magically. Please report any problems in this thread. Thank you.

payouts happened automatically with no intervention. please comment if you are not happy for some reason so I can look into it.
top 15 round contributors corrected itself with the payout.
when clicking on a block now takes you to a working litecoin explorer page.
block stats (graph) is now showing zero variance line properly.

We found another block.

Miners, know right now that, as coded, this pool rewards people who mine steady!!!

I see another aspect of the code that needs fixing since we are using lastNshares=500,000.

So I recommend, if you wish to leave, waiting until a block was solved and then has 120 confirmations.
Over the next 24-48 hours I will be fixing things so we can use a longer lastNshares as well as when a block
is found the payments are based on the moment it is found. Not when it confirms.

It looks like mmcfe has a ton of tweaks that need to be done and do not become obvious until the pool has been
running for a while and some blocks are found. Trying to be honest and open here.

Here is the corrected payouts for block 359221. OWED has been directly credited to your account. Since this is so few users
I did not script it out. So there is nothing to see under transaction history. Refer to this post please. Before I go further I would
like to see comments from pool miners if they consider this correctly paid and fair.

username:ID | calc reward | minus paid | OWED || Act_type | Donation_amt | Block | shares

fcmatt1:1 Tot_rew: 7.46843100 - 6.091112 = "No Extra" || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 75703
4g4g2:10 Tot_rew: 7.85614200 - 8.084795 = "Eating Cost Myself" || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 79633
astralvoid:14 Tot_rew: 5.03292042 - 2.11087206 = 2.92204836 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.05083758 blk: 359221 shares: 51531
maxpower:21 Tot_rew: 0.13703099 - 0.026982 = 0.11004899 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000001 blk: 359221 shares: 1389
Canain:24 Tot_rew: 0.06678900 - 0.015545 = 0.051244 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 677
dftexternal:33 Tot_rew: 0.06481600 - 0.087356 = "Eating Cost Myself" || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 657
JayBee:42 Tot_rew: 5.78726200 - 1.145638 = 4.641624 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 58662
Lxx1:43 Tot_rew: 1.76642036 - 0.45327249 = 1.31314787 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.01784264 blk: 359221 shares: 18086
sathackr:48 Tot_rew: 14.87210887 - 2.35976556 = 12.51234331 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.45996213 blk: 359221 shares: 155412
cookiemonster:55 Tot_rew: 0.14640300 - 0.015469 = 0.130934 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 1484
ditchmagnet:56 Tot_rew: 5.75904700 - 0.87373 = 4.885317 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 58376
lafonseca:61 Tot_rew: 0.02772200 - 0.004248 = 0.023474 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 281
denzel:67 Tot_rew: 0.43250100 - 0.042301 = 0.3902 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 4384
ARCHIE:69 Tot_rew: 0.01361400 - 0.001297 = 0.012317 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000000 blk: 359221 shares: 138
googoo:74 Tot_rew: 0.03995499 - 0.003806 = 0.03614899 || Act_type: 0 Dnt_amt: 0.00000001 blk: 359221 shares: 405

2.92204836 + 0.11004899 + 0.051244 + 4.641624 + 1.31314787 + 12.51234331 + 0.130934 + 4.885317 + 0.023474 + 0.3902 + 0.012317 + 0.03614899 = 27.02884752 total owed to 15 users for Block 359,221 going back lastNshares=500,000

6.091112 + 8.084795 + 2.11087206 + 2.92204836 + 0.026982 + 0.11004899 + 0.015545 + 0.051244 + 0.06481600 + 1.145638 + 4.641624 + 0.45327249 + 1.31314787 + 2.35976556 + 12.51234331 + 0.015469 + 0.130934 + 0.87373 + 4.885317 + 0.004248 + 0.023474 + 0.042301 + 0.3902 + 0.001297 + 0.012317 + 0.003806 + 0.03614899 = 48.32249663 total paid for block 359,221 not counting donations, not paying myself extra, and other payments to other users due to lastNshares=1,000,000 messing up.

astralvoid has been paid the bounty of 10 LTC.
he can confirm here if he wishes.

working on user corrected payouts next.

I will be making corrections to the payouts tonight. Last block 359441 looks good when it comes to the payment, fyi.

We were lucky enough to find another block tonight.

Well I see the bug in the code. But it is 3:30 AM now. I do not have enough time to fix it properly and test it before this
block gets paid out. The problem with the code is that when I use 1,000,000 for last N shares (PPLNS) it goes back way to
far and counts too many shares. That means my friend and I get overpaid and need to take LTC from our accounts and disperse
it accordingly. Since my friend and I mined on the pool during that long bad luck streak we were the ones who got paid to much.
A few others got a bit more but not really worth asking for it back. I will make up for it.

But the bug does not get activated when I use 500,000 for last N shares (PPLNS). It has to do with the $l_bound variable getting
populated with a block number and how far back it is supposed to look. $l_bound is used in quite a few sql queries in the payout code.

I consider the information below to be public. Usernames are on the website, hash speeds, LTC/day, shares in a round, etc...
Anyone who wanted to could gather this up in a rough fashion. I need to make it public so users can compare my estimate to what
they got.. and also see what I am getting for my hash speed in this recent payout. If someone does not like this information posted
here please tell me and I can remove it.

So, for this payout, I see this as getting paid:

totalRoundShares=506153
...
...

Miner Allocated: 49.32870296
Pool Allocated: 0.67129704
Total: 50

Those who mined steady tend to get a bit more. Those who pop in and out tend to get a bit less. PPLNS is like that.
It looks back a certain amount of shares to determine the payout and previously paid shares can pay again.

I owe astralvoid 10 LTC for finding the 3rd block. I did not have a bounty up yet for the 4th block which sathackr found. I need
to think if I owe him something extra or will he just allow me to put a bounty up on the 5th block. So lets see if he busts my balls.

I need to take money from my friend and I and disperse accordingly to other users.
I need to fix the bug and decide if going back to last N shares being 1 million. Or just stick with 500,000.
Please report back how this payout looks.

I apologize for the confusion and need a bit of time to iron it out.

fcmatt

I am pretty sure something is not right with accurate payouts. I am seeing some users who should have more.
I am going to investigate this tonight and correct people's accounts. Please bear with me.

OK. I found the user. It appears to be astralvoid.worker2.

Here is the evidence.

I have stratum running in a logging mode. INFO.
Here is the relevant line:

2013-05-25 16:35:42,382 INFO template_registry # We found a block candidate! 00000000002f8e21d33f38c0f8dc510960ca1b616fcfa4bf0f5d9c58e5dc6d00

I then goto mysql, our pools database server, and look at table shares_history. I do a search for this solution. I say solution
as that is what the column is labeled in the table. This row pops up and I am posting the pieces here in a readable format which
will show the proof.

Block number: 359221
username: astralvoid.worker2
upstream result: Blank (problem here. i am pretty sure that was supposed to be labeled with something. it was not)
solution: 00000000002f8e21d33f38c0f8dc510960ca1b616fcfa4bf0f5d9c58e5dc6d00
time: 2013-05-25 16:35:42

Lets wait for astralvoid to post here and check to see what his best share was. He strikes me as an honest person and maybe he
will even give us a screen shot if possible. He won that last bounty too. Talk about lucky.

FYI: astralvoid posts more on the litecoin forum then here. https://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,3674.0.html

Did anyone else have a best share higher then 39 million that would like to dispute this?

We have found our 3rd block but the user is "unknown" in the database. I am attempting to figure out which user found this
block. If anyone has any tips for mmcfe and this happening please message me.

Thanks alot I will give that a try.

well please check out this link then: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/guiminer-scrypt-a-guiminer-fork-for-mining-scrypt-chains-150331

guiminer designed for scrypt coins like litecoin

you need the correct version for each coin.

the one you have is for SHA256 based coins, like bitcoin.
the one you need, in the link I posted above, is for SCRYPT based coins like litecoin.

 I would say no I have only recently got into bitcoin and only a week into litecoin. I have been mining for about a month with little to no knowledge of it other than I earn a few mbtc here or there on an AMD A6-3420m APU and an AMD Radeon HD6520G grafix card on a laptop.


I am using GUIMiner v2012-12-3
No settings as I haven't been able to dig up the right info yet.

Oh man, are you sure you are running cgminer right and adding --scrypt to the way u run it?

Hope what little speed I offered helped but after 3 days and over 1000 stales and 0 accepted time to get back to btc. Seems I can get accepts of btc but not on ltc.

Since pushpool has a share difficulty setting of 63 or better you may see some variance in the speed being reported.
A diff of 63 is difficult to find for a 24 khash/sec miner. So you will find that you submit a bunch of shares at once and your
speed is higher. Then you hit a drought and submit less shares so your speed is less as reported on the website.

Just know that everyone has to submit difficulty 63 shares. Both pushpool and stratum users. So it is very fair when it comes time
to determine payouts for users. I am exploring variable difficulty which will help miners with a lesser amount of hashing power.
It will allow them to submit lesser difficulty shares, their hashing speed as reported on the website will not vary as much, and
gives you something to look at.

And we found our 2nd block! very good luck. The bounty for the 3rd block is 10 LTC.

stupid noob question my miner says 24mh/s but site says 15kh/s is this due to difficulty or something I am not understanding?

1st block found by astralvoid. So the 20 LTC bounty has been claimed.

I am reviewing all the payout code now and will setup a new bounty as soon as I am satisfied all current
users are getting paid correctly.

Making some tweaks to the server tonight. I will have to restart some daemons so you may see a disconnect or three.
Bear with me.

----

sathackr threw some nice power at the pool and gave it a stress. I disabled verbose logging. I up'd the diff for pushpool and stratum to 63.
I am looking for other ways to keep things stable. Thanks.

On the contrary the domain name was picked out to be generic in case I wanted to start a pool for a different coin.
feather.coin-pool.com for example. I do not think anyone cares. having lite, coin, pool, etc... in your domain is sorta expected.