Author

Topic: [LTCD] LitecoinDark.com ★ Scrypt ★ Difficulty Shield ★ Multipool ★ Fast - page 295. (Read 368578 times)

legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


With that way of speaking is very diffecult to take you serious. And guessing from your age, you should have learned to speak polite...
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014
ex uno plures
Thank you for your opinion.  

Get some sleep. Cuddle your kids, hug your wife. Come back in 12 hours.

There isn't a shitcoin made that is worth more than your family. Even this one.

Thats my opinion.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.


Thank you for your opinion. 
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
It has something to do with MPOS not connecting to their compiled daemon.  I have not had a chance to speak with the best-pool team as I was predisposed earlier when the PM arrived.  If you are wiling to help as well, great, and thank you.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
I have no direct access to the primary github.  All I can do is send a pull request, which I may have neglected to do in my sleepless state.  I apologize for this, and am submitting the request now.  As for the OP, I do agree that the staging repo should be listed, but again, have not even had the chance to address this with Rob.

I know that you are working hard, but please coordinate the communication better for the sake of LTCD.

Also, did you coordinate with exchanges and confirmed that they updated their wallets to the new version? I assure you that they don't read this thread and won't know that there is a fork if the new version isn't even in the official repository.

I am just the coder.  I also have multiple real jobs and a life to live outside of crypto.  I don't get paid for what I do, nor do I have time to handle every request or issue personally or even in a timely fashion.  I am a 32 year old father of six who is badly in need of sleep.  This is why there are other team members.  We work great as a team, but our greatest weakness is in the fact that we live on different continents and timezones are way off.

Not trying to be defensive, just saying that if there are any shortcomings, please understand that I'm not the only person involved, even if I do tend to be the most vocal.  And I did speak with people from exchanges, but I was also busy with other major issues.  As it stands, I have yet to find time to assist best-pool with their issue.  I can assure you that I will, but there are only so many things one man can do at once.

And I'm not being offensive. I'm just trying to make sure that the two most important issues when preparing the fork have been addressed: 1) People knowing that they have to update and knowing how to do this; 2) Exchanges knowing that they have to update and knowing how to do this.

Thanks for all the great work. I just saw that the 1) wasn't addressed and wanted to point that out. You can't really execute a successful fork if people cannot upgrade their wallets.

Also, can someone remind what was the best pool issue? I might be able to help.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014
ex uno plures
And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

Don't lecture me about software development. I was writing unix device drivers 35 years ago.
And here's a bit of advice, don't expect people to dig through your documentation to find out that you are using non-standard development methodology and that your master branch is a piece of crap.

You are a fucking idiot. First, for publishing a master commit that doesn't work. Second for trying to play in this game with 6 kids, several jobs, and no sleep for 36 hours.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable.  Each release tree carries its own branch and tag.  I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly.  Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...



Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable.

+1

hence master.

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

guess I've been in a hole the past few years along with all my project partners.

I didn't say everyone does this.  But it is extremely common practice.  I meant no offense in any case.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
Wasssssup!
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I have no direct access to the primary github.  All I can do is send a pull request, which I may have neglected to do in my sleepless state.  I apologize for this, and am submitting the request now.  As for the OP, I do agree that the staging repo should be listed, but again, have not even had the chance to address this with Rob.

I know that you are working hard, but please coordinate the communication better for the sake of LTCD.

Also, did you coordinate with exchanges and confirmed that they updated their wallets to the new version? I assure you that they don't read this thread and won't know that there is a fork if the new version isn't even in the official repository.

I am just the coder.  I also have multiple real jobs and a life to live outside of crypto.  I don't get paid for what I do, nor do I have time to handle every request or issue personally or even in a timely fashion.  I am a 32 year old father of six who is badly in need of sleep.  This is why there are other team members.  We work great as a team, but our greatest weakness is in the fact that we live on different continents and timezones are way off.

Not trying to be defensive, just saying that if there are any shortcomings, please understand that I'm not the only person involved, even if I do tend to be the most vocal.  And I did speak with people from exchanges, but I was also busy with other major issues.  As it stands, I have yet to find time to assist best-pool with their issue.  I can assure you that I will, but there are only so many things one man can do at once.

Nice Job Troll, wil do my best to answer questions from others, so if people has problems, then please PM and I will answer.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126

Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable.  Each release tree carries its own branch and tag.  I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly.  Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...



Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable.

+1

hence master.

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.

guess I've been in a hole the past few years along with all my project partners.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable.  Each release tree carries its own branch and tag.  I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly.  Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...



Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable.

+1

hence master.

And with respect maybe you missed the part of litecoin's documentation where it states that they have the same policy.  This is fairly common practice throughout the software development industry.  Some people prefer to work in a "develop" branch instead.  We'll see, but if you want "stable" and "tested", always use a particular branch and/or tag.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
Wasssssup!
I work in a Newspaper Advertising Company.  I design small ads for a local newpaper. My logo design abilities are not as great as some others out there. Here is my second design just for kicks.

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Litecoindark Reddit Moderator
We all had to learn to walk so lets just take this one step at a time. Soon we will  be sprinting . We have a great community and great future and great devs.  Grin
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
I am not great at Logo Design....I work in newspaper advertising.... here is something I made in like 15 minutes just for kicks!



wow I like that looks good  Smiley

I have some new stuff, make sure you check them all  Grin Grin Grin
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lite-coin-dark-logoltcd-bounty-for-chosen-logo-781305
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I keep put in buy support.....
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
I have no direct access to the primary github.  All I can do is send a pull request, which I may have neglected to do in my sleepless state.  I apologize for this, and am submitting the request now.  As for the OP, I do agree that the staging repo should be listed, but again, have not even had the chance to address this with Rob.

I know that you are working hard, but please coordinate the communication better for the sake of LTCD.

Also, did you coordinate with exchanges and confirmed that they updated their wallets to the new version? I assure you that they don't read this thread and won't know that there is a fork if the new version isn't even in the official repository.

I am just the coder.  I also have multiple real jobs and a life to live outside of crypto.  I don't get paid for what I do, nor do I have time to handle every request or issue personally or even in a timely fashion.  I am a 32 year old father of six who is badly in need of sleep.  This is why there are other team members.  We work great as a team, but our greatest weakness is in the fact that we live on different continents and timezones are way off.

Not trying to be defensive, just saying that if there are any shortcomings, please understand that I'm not the only person involved, even if I do tend to be the most vocal.  And I did speak with people from exchanges, but I was also busy with other major issues.  As it stands, I have yet to find time to assist best-pool with their issue.  I can assure you that I will, but there are only so many things one man can do at once.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014
ex uno plures
I'm moving on. This is a waste of time. Next ?
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126

Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable.  Each release tree carries its own branch and tag.  I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly.  Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...



Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable.

+1

hence master.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014
ex uno plures

Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable.  Each release tree carries its own branch and tag.  I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly.  Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...



Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable.
sr. member
Activity: 241
Merit: 250
I have no direct access to the primary github.  All I can do is send a pull request, which I may have neglected to do in my sleepless state.  I apologize for this, and am submitting the request now.  As for the OP, I do agree that the staging repo should be listed, but again, have not even had the chance to address this with Rob.

I know that you are working hard, but please coordinate the communication better for the sake of LTCD.

Also, did you coordinate with exchanges and confirmed that they updated their wallets to the new version? I assure you that they don't read this thread and won't know that there is a fork if the new version isn't even in the official repository.

Actually the guy you were talking to earlier - Mullick - is the wallet guru for Cryptsy  Wink
Jump to: