Who thinks that this is all drama and all our money was invested into XPY, there was some arrangement between GAW and LTC Gear, the launch of XPY is when LTC Gear got down and we started to hear stories....as soon as XPY started to fade the website is back up!
Topic: LTCgear.com, the best scrypt/scrypt n/X11 cloud mining service, Not paying!!! - page 96. (Read 361391 times)
January 26, 2015, 03:46:38 PM
January 26, 2015, 03:44:29 PM
Sure, I presumed it was just cosmetic. He is showing what it will be like, but it's clearly not the proper thing yet. There's no real point adding it anyway except for those users he is letting withdraw (assuming they are not test accounts).
January 26, 2015, 03:15:26 PM
I'm no expert, but to me this doesn't look like a share balance script, only a simple WP text widget
Just my two satoshi...
Code:
Just my two satoshi...
I mentioned this as well. It's not exactly conclusive proof that nobody can see balances.. but it's a strong argument for it. There are ways to make a text widget interact with the database etc, plus you could show different widgets to different users, but it seems an odd way of doing it. I would be close to 100% certain that every single user is currently seeing the same HTML content in that widget.
January 26, 2015, 02:34:12 PM
I'm no expert, but to me this doesn't look like a share balance script, only a simple WP text widget
Just my two satoshi...
Code:
Just my two satoshi...
January 26, 2015, 02:25:35 PM
Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh 
Not a scam i dont know yet.ill let u know after ive withdrawn my unknown pending balance.
Also if this tax would cost more then the missing payments id be very hessitant.
There is No tax on the MODS right ?
It said u would have those forever and the shares had the yearly(read as after one year) renewal on them.
January 26, 2015, 01:52:43 PM
Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh
Not a scam i dont know yet.ill let u know after ive withdrawn my unknown pending balance.
Also if this tax would cost more then the missing payments id be very hessitant.
There is No tax on the MODS right ?
January 26, 2015, 01:02:14 PM
Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh
Not a scam i dont know yet.ill let u know after ive withdrawn my unknown pending balance.
Also if this tax would cost more then the missing payments id be very hessitant.
There is No tax on the MODS right ? or did those get added in 2 now i cant imagine how , just want to be 100% sure.(not that i can see mine atm but i sense their there.
January 26, 2015, 12:49:40 PM
Clearly ltcgear is not a scam or he would not be going this far. Sure the business is questionable but he was hacked. Goes to show people abuse nice things. The one cloud miner that has been around for a while and made ROIs always in reach. Then some hackers have to abuse it and essentially try to bankrupt the company by creating all those fake shares. Sigh
January 26, 2015, 12:44:13 PM
I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
It certainly said that one year of operation is included. That we write 2015 now is just a bad excuse. If he really asks for this "tax" for(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
all shares regardless of acquisition date, people will not accept this I'm pretty sure.
There wont be any "choice" in the matter im sure u will have to pay the tax to either get to your payments or keep your shares or both.
I know i wouldnt be Happy about it but if its that or lose all its not much of a choice.
I wonder what kind of number it will be.(since it read like one year was included i didnt care much at the time of purchase now im thinking that could be a huge number it said something like less then original purchase price so that could be 6-10 weeks of payment potentially.)
Does anyone have a SS of the what it said originally ?
Edit:
Also i bought some gen2 .. im gonna have to pay the "tax" on those as well that would seem a little , erm unfair?(Not that im agreeing with the other tax this just seems a little wel "bonus" unfair.)
All is speculation, on Gen2 new costs would be weird since there hasn't been talk about "renewal" for those. For percentage, it will be between 5-20% if we go with the original post from the shop.
January 26, 2015, 12:15:22 PM
I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
It certainly said that one year of operation is included. That we write 2015 now is just a bad excuse. If he really asks for this "tax" for(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
all shares regardless of acquisition date, people will not accept this I'm pretty sure.
There wont be any "choice" in the matter im sure u will have to pay the tax to either get to your payments or keep your shares or both.
I know i wouldnt be Happy about it but if its that or lose all its not much of a choice.
I wonder what kind of number it will be.(since it read like one year was included i didnt care much at the time of purchase now im thinking that could be a huge number it said something like less then original purchase price so that could be 6-10 weeks of payment potentially.)
Does anyone have a SS of the what it said originally ?
Edit:
Also i bought some gen2 .. im gonna have to pay the "tax" on those as well that would seem a little , erm unfair?(Not that im agreeing with the other tax this just seems a little wel "bonus" unfair.)
January 26, 2015, 12:02:09 PM
I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
It certainly said that one year of operation is included. That we write 2015 now is just a bad excuse. If he really asks for this "tax" for(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
all shares regardless of acquisition date, people will not accept this I'm pretty sure.
January 26, 2015, 11:44:09 AM
The withdraw button is presumably ready but he is not ready to allow payouts yet. So it's idle.
January 26, 2015, 11:41:49 AM
Has anyone been able to withdraw anything , i hope the percent is his bad english and he means a percentage instead of just 1%.
I doubt anyone would pay the tax without getting their payments.
I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
Edit: no i cant see my mods either.
I doubt anyone would pay the tax without getting their payments.
I thought when i bought the shares it said one YEAR of operation was paid for and After that year i would have to pay to keep the shares.
(maybe i missread or missunderstood but thats what i remember for some reason.)
Edit: no i cant see my mods either.
January 26, 2015, 11:40:26 AM
What is that withdraw button for?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.
It is to withdraw our fictional balances that just say pending.
Ohh!! But but... Who has any balance on there??
i think everyone's balance just says 'pending' insn't it?
January 26, 2015, 10:41:37 AM
What is that withdraw button for?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.
It is to withdraw our fictional balances that just say pending.
January 26, 2015, 10:41:00 AM
What is that withdraw button for?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.
Right, but can you withdraw? I mean whats the point if you can't withdraw?
January 26, 2015, 10:38:52 AM
What is that withdraw button for?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
I don't want to sound like a sarcastic douche but it's probably to withdraw.
January 26, 2015, 10:20:52 AM
What is that withdraw button for?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
is anyone seeing their MODs?
January 26, 2015, 10:05:38 AM
This I find also very troublesome:
So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)
Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.
Quote
As for example, it happened that an attacker injected in orders payment address pool a certain foreign address at a certain time, then next minute certain users came and placed big orders, all paid to foreign address until foreign address was removed, after which order frequency and value resumed regular trend.
So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)
Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.
It's probably the latter.
Jesus. Baseless speculation. Moron.
Sound familiar?
Hey bud I didn't know it was rhetorical and that I wasn't invited into your circle jerk of assholeness. I'll add you to my growing list of ignored peeps.
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=24447.msg247902#msg247902
Just saying you should stop calling people morons for speculating things, when you also do it yourself. Unless you are proclaiming yourself as a moron too. In which case, I apologize.
January 26, 2015, 09:53:43 AM
This I find also very troublesome:
So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)
Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.
Quote
As for example, it happened that an attacker injected in orders payment address pool a certain foreign address at a certain time, then next minute certain users came and placed big orders, all paid to foreign address until foreign address was removed, after which order frequency and value resumed regular trend.
So it is possible that the hacker introduced an address into the payment address pool, waited until a honest customer placed
and paid an order and then the coins were transferred further on to an address solely in control of the hacker? I wonder if Chris
pays this loss out of his pocket (i.e. if the shares credited to the honest customer will remain in the account.)
Either Chris is shittin us big times or his website was one giant security hole.
It's probably the latter.
Jesus. Baseless speculation. Moron.
Sound familiar?
Hey bud I didn't know it was rhetorical and that I wasn't invited into your circle jerk of assholeness. I'll add you to my growing list of ignored peeps.
Jump to: