LuckyBit "22 days" contest
- Until the end of August - 6.6 BTC prize -
- Until the end of August - 6.6 BTC prize -
Results announced in the dedicated thread
Topic: ➫ ➬ ➫ ➬ LUCKYB.IT ★ +2M bets ★ +100,000 BTC wagered - page 232. (Read 415122 times)
Results announced in the dedicated thread
phew what a good hit 
grats ENGG
grats ENGG
yes , HE DID IT AGAIN !! 2 time on a 0.00304 % ! like we say in france : never 2 without 3 ! ^^
Next Crazy Hour in honor of Enginer ? the greatest winner of Luckybit , pour l'instant ^^ (atm)
Next Crazy Hour in honor of Enginer ? the greatest winner of Luckybit , pour l'instant ^^ (atm)
Congratulations to 1K7ReCuEQSM2eYFsbdB9AsMXCcqgvymBiw for the x999 tonight!
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
ths place=> LB the best!!!
congrats enginer!!!
congrats enginer for hitting 999x
thanks for giveaways
thanks for giveaways
Congratulations to 1K7ReCuEQSM2eYFsbdB9AsMXCcqgvymBiw for the x999 tonight!
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
Congrats to that Lucky winner
Congratulations to 1K7ReCuEQSM2eYFsbdB9AsMXCcqgvymBiw for the x999 tonight!
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
another 999 that wasnt me
grats to engineer for hitting(again)
........and thank you for the giveaway afterwards!! you good peoples.......
Congratulations to 1K7ReCuEQSM2eYFsbdB9AsMXCcqgvymBiw for the x999 tonight!
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
Can confirm that this is indeed legitimate. With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
Yes , great moment ! Wish you the best Enginer ! the greatest winner on Luckybit atm ^^
I was there and witnessed the win. It was truly epic!
Hope you have fun celebrating that big win on the 999x on red!
Hope you have fun celebrating that big win on the 999x on red!
Missed the giveaway 
Congratulations to 1K7ReCuEQSM2eYFsbdB9AsMXCcqgvymBiw for the x999 tonight!
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
With 30BTC in the pocket, we wishes you a nice party
LuckyBit - Tune of the Day
JLynn171, your tune is set! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpbbuaIA3Ds
Next in line:
Quote from: LuckyBitSupport
Propose a tune here and it'll become the LuckyBit's 'Tune of the Day'!
The tune of the day will always be announced in the message box of http://luckyb.it
(The message box is in the upper left corner of the main site.)
Note that hate speech/abusive/racist/sexist songs will be ignored!
The tune of the day will always be announced in the message box of http://luckyb.it
(The message box is in the upper left corner of the main site.)
Note that hate speech/abusive/racist/sexist songs will be ignored!
JLynn171, your tune is set! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpbbuaIA3Ds
Next in line:
JLynn - good song...time to change
@_@ 3 days!!!s1ng - LP also very good!! - SupportLB forgot about?
my propose - very old song - new performance of the song ==>Muse - Feeling Good https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmwRQqJsegw
LuckyBit "22 days" contest
- Until the end of August - 6.6 BTC prize -
- Until the end of August - 6.6 BTC prize -
All the info here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/luckybit-22-days-contest-66-btc-to-win-731686
Good luck!
Only few hours left to grab your tickets and win up to 6.6 BTC
LuckyBit admins here. We could go through the chat logs, check every single claims of you two, but honestly we do not think it is worth it. It is just very unfortunate that it escalated so quickly, regardless of who made what.
Carlos, as a matter of principle to our players, in the name of LuckyBit we would like to apologize if you felt being ban for no or bad reasons. We won't comment on anything that came subsequently, as it is not worthy. Maybe just to say we have absolutely nothing against your business, and wish you success with it.
Hopefully you two could manage to get along better in the future.
Thank you. Carlos, as a matter of principle to our players, in the name of LuckyBit we would like to apologize if you felt being ban for no or bad reasons. We won't comment on anything that came subsequently, as it is not worthy. Maybe just to say we have absolutely nothing against your business, and wish you success with it.
Hopefully you two could manage to get along better in the future.
LuckyBit admins here. We could go through the chat logs, check every single claims of you two, but honestly we do not think it is worth it. It is just very unfortunate that it escalated so quickly, regardless of who made what.
Carlos, as a matter of principle to our players, in the name of LuckyBit we would like to apologize if you felt being ban for no or bad reasons. We won't comment on anything that came subsequently, as it is not worthy. Maybe just to say we have absolutely nothing against your business, and wish you success with it.
Hopefully you two could manage to get along better in the future.
Carlos, as a matter of principle to our players, in the name of LuckyBit we would like to apologize if you felt being ban for no or bad reasons. We won't comment on anything that came subsequently, as it is not worthy. Maybe just to say we have absolutely nothing against your business, and wish you success with it.
Hopefully you two could manage to get along better in the future.
The link was in context with the conversation, which was advertising LuckyB.it. And the link points to a page that shows AdBit's publishers websites.
Incorrect. No request for this information was given by myself or any user. The user posted the link unsolicited after being told that Lucky Bit advertising is already well-managed. There was no "conversation"; there was one user talking about advertising - no, scratch that, one user PUSHING advertising.
Right, now you claim to not even be the same guy? Now I wish I had captured the chats prior to the ban, in which the user 'QQ' claimed it was "his" site and explicitly offered advertising services through it. His chat is very pertinent to this situation, and you have intentionally omitted it. I'll let that fact speak for itself.
Again, lies. The user 'QQ' said: "http://adbit.co/?a=Advertise my website is there". Those were his exact words, go check the chat history and post it here, if I knew you would do this I would have saved the entire chat.And as I said before, that link points to a page that shows AdBit's publishers websites, therefor, 'my website' refers to one of the publishers sites.
If that's the case, why are you even involved? You're digging a deeper hole. If Lucky Bit is not one of your clients, why do you care what people say about your business there? I'm sure the Lucky Bit chatroom is not your target audience. Besides, you could have simply come into chat yourself and confronted me directly - unless you were banned! This is a clever "out" for you - but it does little to address the damning evidence...
Look, nothing against you, I just don't fucking like having other people talk down my work on their own site. Next time just ban the guy and move on, don't talk about other people's hard work specially if you're not 100% sure of what it's about.
I made my point, I'm not arguing about this again, at least not here.
I made my point, I'm not arguing about this again, at least not here.
And I don't like having people talk down MY work on THIS site. I didn't ban the guy UNTIL he insulted other users - I find that a simple request to not repeat the offensive behavior (what I did) is more than enough to stop people from abusing the chatroom. In this case, it wasn't; instead, the user escalated the situation and earned himself a ban. None of the commentary you posted occurred until AFTER the user had insulted several people in chat and the website itself, and had been banned.
I think the facts speak for themselves, and if the administration of Lucky Bit thinks I have erred in my handling of this situation, I would expect them to notify me personally as they have in the past.
I'm sure there's a couple expressions there that pirateat40 used, you must be him in disguise. Makes sense, no?
You insist on that user behavior as if it has anything to do with this.
You yourself said it wasn't allowed to talk about my site in the chat, yet, you kept on going, talking about the business model, etc... I guess the rules don't apply to you then.
We could have ended this by now if you hadn't rejected my request, from now on this is on you.
The link was in context with the conversation, which was advertising LuckyB.it. And the link points to a page that shows AdBit's publishers websites.
Incorrect. No request for this information was given by myself or any user. The user posted the link unsolicited after being told that Lucky Bit advertising is already well-managed. There was no "conversation"; there was one user talking about advertising - no, scratch that, one user PUSHING advertising.
Right, now you claim to not even be the same guy? Now I wish I had captured the chats prior to the ban, in which the user 'QQ' claimed it was "his" site and explicitly offered advertising services through it. His chat is very pertinent to this situation, and you have intentionally omitted it. I'll let that fact speak for itself.
Again, lies. The user 'QQ' said: "http://adbit.co/?a=Advertise my website is there". Those were his exact words, go check the chat history and post it here, if I knew you would do this I would have saved the entire chat.And as I said before, that link points to a page that shows AdBit's publishers websites, therefor, 'my website' refers to one of the publishers sites.
If that's the case, why are you even involved? You're digging a deeper hole. If Lucky Bit is not one of your clients, why do you care what people say about your business there? I'm sure the Lucky Bit chatroom is not your target audience. Besides, you could have simply come into chat yourself and confronted me directly - unless you were banned! This is a clever "out" for you - but it does little to address the damning evidence...
Look, nothing against you, I just don't fucking like having other people talk down my work on their own site. Next time just ban the guy and move on, don't talk about other people's hard work specially if you're not 100% sure of what it's about.
I made my point, I'm not arguing about this again, at least not here.
I made my point, I'm not arguing about this again, at least not here.
And I don't like having people talk down MY work on THIS site. I didn't ban the guy UNTIL he insulted other users - I find that a simple request to not repeat the offensive behavior (what I did) is more than enough to stop people from abusing the chatroom. In this case, it wasn't; instead, the user escalated the situation and earned himself a ban. None of the commentary you posted occurred until AFTER the user had insulted several people in chat and the website itself, and had been banned.
I think the facts speak for themselves, and if the administration of Lucky Bit thinks I have erred in my handling of this situation, I would expect them to notify me personally as they have in the past.
Look, nothing against you, I just don't fucking like having other people talk down my work on their own site. Next time just ban the guy and move on, don't talk about other people's hard work specially if you're not 100% sure of what it's about.
I made my point, I'm not arguing about this again, at least not here.
I made my point, I'm not arguing about this again, at least not here.
Learn to get the joke. The average click-revenue for links is 0.008 cents. AdBit's stated purpose is revenue generation, and that link is an advertisement for AdBit's services and therefore is a revenue-generation link. Of course you didn't actually make anything on my click, since that isn't a refer or clickthrough - besides, that link (that you keep posting here) is only an advertisement showcasing AdBit's recent payments. Lucky Bit does not want outside advertising in the chat, with good reason! I stated then and restate now: that is an advertising link. Advertising serves one purpose: revenue generation for the advertiser, which is you in this case. A link to an advertisement for a product for sale is a revenue-generating link. Of course, I don't know that you or someone else doesn't actually make money on that link - maybe it is a paying link for someone? There is no way for me to know. Either way, if someone used that link then later signed up for AdBit, it would generate revenue for you.
The link was in context with the conversation, which was advertising LuckyB.it. And the link points to a page that shows AdBit's publishers websites.Right, now you claim to not even be the same guy? Now I wish I had captured the chats prior to the ban, in which the user 'QQ' claimed it was "his" site and explicitly offered advertising services through it. His chat is very pertinent to this situation, and you have intentionally omitted it. I'll let that fact speak for itself.
Again, lies. The user 'QQ' said: "http://adbit.co/?a=Advertise my website is there". Those were his exact words, go check the chat history and post it here, if I knew you would do this I would have saved the entire chat.And as I said before, that link points to a page that shows AdBit's publishers websites, therefor, 'my website' refers to one of the publishers sites.
Lucky Bit chat is not an advertising space. This user did not respect that and was given a request to not post it. After pushback, a ban warning was issued, and then a ban was issued once another rule was violated. If that user was not you, then why are you involved and more importantly why are you using the same phrase?
The sole purpose of this post is because you appeared to be in charge of the site (admin), and, talking about my site incorrectly and saying my business model is inferior to others "Pay-Per-Day on a bid system is the LEAST EFFICIENT web advertising in existence". Would you like to go to a random website and have the admin saying on a public chat that your website is bad? Specially if you like that site and use it frequently.About the 'same phrase', that is explained above as being incorrect.
Jump to: