Obviously I also can't prove if 'QQ' was me or not, so I'll just leave it at that.
No need. The only users involved in this transaction were myself, 'QQ', 'QQ2', and 'GreatPR'. User 'QQ' posted the offending link (and the bannable offense). The other two were immediately banned for evading the original ban (which was for ten minutes, and then changed to 24 hours after the evasion). I have no beef with your site (and never did) - I act on behavior in the chat room. If that wasn't you, then why are you involved at all, and more importantly, why are you posting "great PR" at the bottom of your complaint?
Right, now you claim to not even be the same guy? Now I wish I had captured the chats prior to the ban, in which the user 'QQ' claimed it was "his" site and explicitly offered advertising services through it. His chat is very pertinent to this situation, and you have intentionally omitted it. I'll let that fact speak for itself.
The only lying going on here is your inflated and obfuscated accusations against me (without proof - natch) and half-presented screenshots. So, I re-state my opinion and view about AdBit.co - your site - and I challenge you to tell me which of these statements are lies.
* AdBit is a banner ad service that deals exclusively in Bitcoin. Their model is based on a bid-per-day system rather than pay-per-click or pay-per-impression.
* AdBit's stated purpose is revenue generation for advertisers, advertising hosts, and AdBit itself. AdBit generates revenues through its service of providing advertising content supplied by paying advertisers. Advertisers that use AdBit generate revenue through received clicks, and hosts that use AdBit receive revenue from AdBit for using the services.
* Advertising services, redirects, and links to or through said services are generally not allowed in the Lucky Bit chatroom. This includes clickthrough services such as cur.lv and advertising services such as CoinAd or AdBit. (you're involved with CoinAd too, right?)
* The link posted (as user 'QQ') was http://adbit.co/?a=Advertise. Link redirected to about:blank to prevent clickthroughs.
* That link is an advertisement for AdBit.co services. It showcases recent payments to clients.
* Since that link is an advertisement, it is a revenue generation link and is therefore not allowed in Lucky Bit chat.
* The user was not banned for advertising, but rather for insulting other people in chat and then later for ban evasion. A friendly request - followed by a stern warning after meeting resistance - was issued in response to the link. Only after the user insulted another person in chat was he banned for ten minutes.
Lucky Bit chat is not an advertising space. This user did not respect that and was given a request to not post it. After pushback, a ban warning was issued, and then a ban was issued once another rule was violated. If that user was not you, then why are you involved and more importantly why are you using the same phrase?
I gotta say.... you're giving AdBit some great P.R.