Topic: ➫ ➬ ➫ ➬ LUCKYB.IT ★ +2M bets ★ +100,000 BTC wagered - page 88. (Read 414937 times)

There is no reply from support means they are working hard to bring the website back asap. Chill guys it will be back soon.

Hopefully our favorite game will be live in action in next couple of days.We don't have any announcement for today as this was planned to be live again.May be Admin come with surprising announcement that Luckybit is accessible again.

I am sick to wait for this and waiting for come back to online as now today is Monday but there is still same message, i would like to know about the current maintenance status when it will be finished?

All waiting for good news from LB, Hopefully immediately LB will rise again

LB is love LB is life Please, Please be back up soon... My life draining away!

-BoXXoB

Same thing for me. Any news on when luckyb.it will be up again?

happened to me as well, and now LB micro took it all from me too 658 bets without hit fringe

Hey you guys know I  ❤ luckyb.it but 1 thing does aggravate me about this down time. I wagered over 1btc to hit shark status on this new system and boom luckyb.it is down for 3+ days. That to me is not cool. I'm sure you guys hadn't planned on downtime but some of us are daily loyal players and took big risks to get our statuses. I think you guys should think about that for those of us whom are losing our butts daily

Perhaps its time to look at popular altcoins and move the engine to accept them in the meantime
Diversification strategies and what not although I still prefer Bitcoins myself
That or set it up to do off-chain seeding for a while instead of relying on Blockchain although that may be more complicated than temporarily increasing the minimum transaction fees.

i know but most of those transaction have fees less than .0001BTC. all my transactions(60+) which is unconfirmed during the stress test are now confirmed with 100+ confirmations so i think the transactions which are left unconfirmed is those who send it with small fees

its not just about current blockchain services issues, it might be normal now but LB are trying to fixed past troubles as well as preventing the same issues in the future by making some adjustment. i guess we better wait a little bit longer but once it back up we gonna have a better LB without worried of the stress tests again.

ive had my transactions unconfirmed for 3+ days because of the stress tests, I wouldnt be surprised if there are still a few unconfirmed ones.

Me too. But if you read the Bitcoin discussion section you can see many people with tx's unconfirmed for many days.

Well, im not experiencing difficulties in my transactions to get confirmed now compared to last week as long as my fees is .0001 the least and above so i think luckybit can open now the bet engine

yeah, fuck this spam, i miss the LB community on the chat, and for sure to make some bets    let we know about your plans, all the best

Luckybit, the blockchain spam doesn't seem to be going away anytime soon, so what is your upcoming plans?

Thank you for taking the time to explain this, and how it affect LB.
I agree, better go offline at make the adjustment, better safe than sorry.

I was kinda feeling like playing a few coins this fine evening, but still offline.
Hope you will get online soon again.
GL

If you see the last line (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11826908) the winner got 1.142 BTC!... maybe for you that is not a high prize, but for 95% of the bitcoins users yes it is.

Open a multiple lines is not a good option, because the line change each 2 weeks, at last all the users have a chance, i haven't see the same user winning 2 times.

When admins open this promo, the idea was a "Short time promo line", and is great they keep changing the line and giving the chance to new users for create their own line.

Multiple lines can be a good idea, but i think that way the users will split the profits, prize will be smaller and that is not cool.

Is just my point of view and i know i can be wrong, but admins know "how" and "why" they do the things that way. 

(Note that these opinions are personal - one of the admin speaking for himself)

Like almost everybody (except Peter Todd and few others), we think the limit should be increased at some point. In the original idea of Satoshi there was no limit, and in the original code of Satoshi, the limit was 32MB simply because it was the maximum size of a packet. The current limit of 1MB was added later solely as an anti-spam measure, and assumed to be raised at some point.

However even people who are ok to increase the block size, do not agree when to do it, and by how much...

Personally, we believe a dynamic limit is the way to go. Because hardcoding is rarely a good coding decision, and in this case a larger limit that would be hardcoded would simply postpone the issue, and in the future it would be even harder to change if Bitcoin keeps growing. There are two possibilities of dynamic limits:
The first is a static predefined schedule (as one of the proposals of G. Andresen for instance, double the size every year or so).
The second is fully dynamic, and is adapted based on some algorithmic rules that take into account recent observed conditions. This is how the mining difficulty is already adapted for instance: it follows a simple rule whose input is the time between the latest blocks. Similar rules could be used to adapt the block size as well, some altcoins such as Monero use this sucessefully, so we know it is in the realm of the reasonable at least. See for instance https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/elastic-block-cap-with-rollover-penalties-1078521 or https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/38fmra/max_block_size_2_average_size_of_last_144_blocks/

Not sure if u refering primedice as my site ? Its not mine.

And deposits on pd show up after one confirmation . But that is not the topic for here .


What lb is doing is very risky . Idk why they did not yet switch to some sort of wallets for players where u deposit and then place bets from balance.