As for me, I stick to the reputation of bounty managers before I will have to participate in any bounty.
As for bounty hunters, many are after bounty with higher bounty allocation and with higher rewards aor even coins that are already trading, but it seems that's not what cryptocurrency is all about.
We the bounty hunters have to go about our research first before we'll say we want to participate in any bounty as not to result in waste of time and energy over the bounty and thereafter not going to pay
Topic: Luring hunters to promote bounties - page 10. (Read 1553 times)
I like the statement of the OP that most of the projects are just plain rubbish. And it is true that very few campaign managers really do care about his campaigns. I've seen one who manages a lot of eth token-paying campaigns but up until now, most of them haven't received their worthless tokens yet. Those large numbers are just to attract hunters but in reality, you will be lucky if you can get few bucks from your long running campaigns. But it is up to the user if he will join or not, it is his own choice in the very first place.
Indeed there are some projects who promise huge rewards and after bounty hunters either get some coins without value either sometimes get nothing, i hope in future all choose better projects.
Nothing is absolutely guaranteed in this space, I have seen a lot of recommend highly rated bounty managers that managed projects that failed, a lot of them should be looking for another job or join bounty hunting as well. The truth is that majority of success recorded here largely depend on luck. Just do what you feel is right and hope for success
No one guarantees that with 4-5 projects you will also be able to earn. Perhaps even some of them will be empty garbage, and what will you earn in a year?) Of course, it’s everyone’s business how to get lost ... Either take part in a large number of bounty programs, or choose 1-2 every month. In any case, I wish you all good luck)
Yes, very often ICO fraudulent projects attract bounty hunters with large payouts, because they are not going to actually pay them. At the same time, very rarely a situation arises when an ICO begins to be conducted, and new tokens are already being traded on the exchange. In general, I also noticed that those projects that promise high rewards do not pay them very often, even if they were not scammers. At the same time, I was always surprised that inconspicuous ICO projects with small payments very often not only promptly transferred the promised tokens to our wallets, but they also traded well on the stock exchange.
Actually, I have participated in a bounty with the allocation of a large $ 1 million dollar token, but after the promotion was completed and the sale of tokens was completed, garbage was not sold at all on the market, while I followed Bounty with an allocation of $ 50k tokens to be fast and expensive.
so we shouldn't be tempted by the big prize.
so we shouldn't be tempted by the big prize.
The best way to hunt good bounty is to first make good research about the project, the team and bounty manager. With this you can know much about the project if is good to promote or not.
We must be more selective in choosing a gift project. Many projects offer very large results but the project fails and is not listed as an Exchange. We must be able to find reliable ICO projects so that we can also get good results.
I always stick to the bounty manager as well, because some of them have great reputation and almost all projects are already listed on exchanges. But there are some examples of bounties that have distributed huge rewards and are already listed with great volumes as well.
I agree with you that seeing a bounty manager can be used as a benchmark when we choose a bounty. A bounty manager is an initial indication whether the project will pay or not. some bounty managers are given perfect rates because they always provide services to Bounty hunters.the rewards will be distributed properly, even there's no assurance whether the tokens will succeed and be listed so it can brings some amount of
profits, but there's some good chances as bounty managers also needs compensations.
Large amounts of up to millions of dollars in many bounty campaigns are only counted by tokens when they have not even been created. I believe many people will choose as well
But more experienced bounty hunters know that these amounts valuated in USD have only support in the market when there is bigger demand for altcoins.
Bounty campaign now is different from 2017 or 2018. In the past, the more the bounty pool, the more you will get.
It was because many ICO's has reached the hardcap, and the buyers were keep buying even after the token sale.
But now, it will be better to join bounty campaign with not too much reward, to avoid dumping after main sale.
It was because many ICO's has reached the hardcap, and the buyers were keep buying even after the token sale.
But now, it will be better to join bounty campaign with not too much reward, to avoid dumping after main sale.
I think its better to stop promoting ICO projects since too few people are the only investors left ,many others are after IEO projects ,investors are tired of ICOs already and so am i
I always stick to the bounty manager as well, because some of them have great reputation and almost all projects are already listed on exchanges. But there are some examples of bounties that have distributed huge rewards and are already listed with great volumes as well.
I agree with you that seeing a bounty manager can be used as a benchmark when we choose a bounty. A bounty manager is an initial indication whether the project will pay or not. some bounty managers are given perfect rates because they always provide services to Bounty hunters. legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Yes, a lot of bounty hunters really attract big rewards for rewards, but they don’t understand that with such a big reward the project may not collect the minimum amount and just then don’t pay the reward.
It's because a lot of newbies have been entered into bitcointalk, mostly since the last year and they don't know how to evaluate a project, they join any of the project they see. Nowadays, most of the projects fail to collect fund because investors have lost faith from ICO. Bounty hunters should undertstand this.
I think the large and small allocations given do not affect the success of the promotion program that will be carried out to lure the people involved to participate in it, professional managers who can determine the success of the project, because professional managers are certainly more careful in choosing projects that are good for can be promoted
i noticed that some bounty campaign this 2019 are those who are in trading already..for me its better to join that campaign rather than spending my time and effort with worthless project
3)there are few bounty managers that I respect ,they take there job very serious and I always like to follow them ,waiting for them to launch new bounties
Well said. However, that these perceived reputable managers are involved in managing a campaign doesn't essentially mean the project won't turn out shitty. I have participated in bounties managed by reputable manager and up till this moment some of the projects are yet to be listed on the CMC. It's a tough one really. Even being careful not to fall victims to these scammers doesn't really get one safe because one could still end up getting scammed. 
Large amounts of up to millions of dollars in many bounty campaigns are only counted by tokens when they have not even been created. I believe many people will choose as well
What I've learnt about bounties so far
1)many bounty hunters are joining bounties that has huge stake allocations like 300,000$ upward ,some are even after the 1000000$ ones well I've stop hunting for projects that lure hunters with huge rewards as many of them are plain rubbish
2)I've learn to always join bounties that are already listed and trading with good volume and mind you these bounties always have low bounty rewards like 75k to 100k but there is high assurance of selling your tokens if you wish to ,not keeping coins that will never see the light of the days again ,I mean tokens that will never get listed
3)there are few bounty managers that I respect ,they take there job very serious and I always like to follow them ,waiting for them to launch new bounties ,I prefer to join 4-5 projects in a year than promoting shitcoins
Your first reason is very accurate. I have experienced this with one project called VEIAG. They offered a mouth watering 6 million dollars in bounty rewards, but the project disappeared after about 3 months of the campaign and promised to reopen since September last year. Till now, there has been no news about them. It was all scam. 1)many bounty hunters are joining bounties that has huge stake allocations like 300,000$ upward ,some are even after the 1000000$ ones well I've stop hunting for projects that lure hunters with huge rewards as many of them are plain rubbish
2)I've learn to always join bounties that are already listed and trading with good volume and mind you these bounties always have low bounty rewards like 75k to 100k but there is high assurance of selling your tokens if you wish to ,not keeping coins that will never see the light of the days again ,I mean tokens that will never get listed
3)there are few bounty managers that I respect ,they take there job very serious and I always like to follow them ,waiting for them to launch new bounties ,I prefer to join 4-5 projects in a year than promoting shitcoins
Jump to: