Pages:
Author

Topic: LUXCoin—New PHI2 PoW/PoS Hybrid—SC—SegWit—PrivateSend—PoS Web Wallet—LuxGate - page 35. (Read 130231 times)

full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 118
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Guys, I bought a coin for another $ 40, i held her and believe that there will be good growth.
For some reason, I see a price of only $ 3  Embarrassed   But I do not stop believing and buy some more.

Is there someone who will tell me what to expect?

hey all,

I'm new to luxcoin and thought it was a nice coin to invest in, so i bought a few @70 000 sat and mining it
but i see it goes only down and down.
dit i make a mistake?

gr xms


At the moment, the capitalization is on the 600th place, this is how much the project is interesting to investors. If there is ever an explosive growth of interest in the cryptocurrency again, the old investors will come to a breakeven. Or not  Grin
xms
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
Guys, I bought a coin for another $ 40, i held her and believe that there will be good growth.
For some reason, I see a price of only $ 3  Embarrassed   But I do not stop believing and buy some more.

Is there someone who will tell me what to expect?

hey all,

I'm new to luxcoin and thought it was a nice coin to invest in, so i bought a few @70 000 sat and mining it
but i see it goes only down and down.
dit i make a mistake?

gr xms
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252
Introducing LUXCORE ACADEMY.  Our team's attempt at educating the community on some of the tech heavy terminology we use in describing what makes our product special. 
Stay tuned later this week for our first entry!


sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252

LUX have always been better for Nvidia than AMD miners? Off course the AMD miners should be able to mine it, but it is quite saturated with hasrate at the moment.
With worse performance i dont see many AMD miners going for it even with a decent miner? But the option should be there, i agree on that.
As I said, Im not a coder, so cant be 100% sure in, but practice showing that PHi2 is more friendly for nvidia gpus, considering how much "green" miners for PHi2 existing to this moment.

Hi | I have sent deposit LUX coin from the old wallet v5.0.2 to Cryptopia , The transactions is ok but still no info on Cryptopia about my deposit . pls help me .
5.0.2 should be ok for using now. Check your TX by explorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/ first, if TX passed through I suggest to wait for a while, might be just some deposit delay from Topia's end. If after few days your coins still not be deposited - sent a ticket to Topia's support.
I checked my TX by by explorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/ . it still not yet pass through , now what i need to do next ? pls help me .
You mean that your TX not shown in explorer? If so, looks like your TX never went from qt wallet. Follow upgrade guide below and try to send again from latest 5.1 wallet
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/388703503973089301/464859587934289921/LUX_QT_v5_upgrade_and_reset_guide_for_Win_MAC.pdf
I mean , My address show as below . it still not sent coin .

Address   LhgRTfgQQBq4sVdyzmp99roc8JN7BJdnvf    
Balance   28.6354675 LUX   
Rich List   Rank 4261   at block 334574 with 28.6354675 LUX
Guesstimated Wallet   8 addresses
Received   131.09244444 LUX   in 623 transactions
Sent           102.45697694 LUX   in 9 transactions
Yes, I can see your TX didnt passed through, follow a guide that I provided above then try to send again.
Hi guy ,  i made follow your guide and i see my wallet have coin but i cannot send it . when send coin it show " The transaction was rejected ! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent , such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here " pls help me.
Please do following, in lux-qt go to Instruments -> Wallet repair, there pick one by one 3 options - Rescan blockchain files, Recover transactions 1 & 2. After it will be done wallet will show you the coins that your current wallet.dat cointains.
member
Activity: 247
Merit: 12
Guys, I bought a coin for another $ 40, i held her and believe that there will be good growth.
For some reason, I see a price of only $ 3  Embarrassed   But I do not stop believing and buy some more.

Is there someone who will tell me what to expect?
copper member
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra

If needed? Huh Huh

Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do?

I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users.
You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that.

After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term.


Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw.
For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know.


You see thats the thing i dont agree nor you, but the team up to this day. i know you are communicating the issues about the project, but here you are the projects face. The team have several people working on it and thats just fine. However you are earning quite a lot of money with masternodes and else when you thought of fork, you didnt ask the users for it if we agreed or not, you are the owner and do with it what you want and thats correct. But miners should have been ready before the fork, you cannot ask users to solve a problem you created without asking anybody.
when you look for upcoming upgrades you must be ready to have what it takes in the next step. It sounds to us that you forgot the amd miner or that actually thats not a priority, and thats why the price is lowering such an ammount as it is now.

Just a constructive criticism.

First of all, I like that we can agree to disagree.
In addition, who is “you” and who is “earning quite a lot of money from masternodes”? Please revisit the WP and the explorers, there is no founder’s cut and/or reward for the team.

In regards to AMD mining support, as lupanar pointed out before - we are making efforts. Rest assured that the team wants a working and fast sgminer as much as you do.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Hi | I have sent deposit LUX coin from the old wallet v5.0.2 to Cryptopia , The transactions is ok but still no info on Cryptopia about my deposit . pls help me .
5.0.2 should be ok for using now. Check your TX by explorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/ first, if TX passed through I suggest to wait for a while, might be just some deposit delay from Topia's end. If after few days your coins still not be deposited - sent a ticket to Topia's support.
I checked my TX by by explorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/ . it still not yet pass through , now what i need to do next ? pls help me .
You mean that your TX not shown in explorer? If so, looks like your TX never went from qt wallet. Follow upgrade guide below and try to send again from latest 5.1 wallet
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/388703503973089301/464859587934289921/LUX_QT_v5_upgrade_and_reset_guide_for_Win_MAC.pdf
I mean , My address show as below . it still not sent coin .

Address   LhgRTfgQQBq4sVdyzmp99roc8JN7BJdnvf    
Balance   28.6354675 LUX   
Rich List   Rank 4261   at block 334574 with 28.6354675 LUX
Guesstimated Wallet   8 addresses
Received   131.09244444 LUX   in 623 transactions
Sent           102.45697694 LUX   in 9 transactions
Yes, I can see your TX didnt passed through, follow a guide that I provided above then try to send again.
Hi guy ,  i made follow your guide and i see my wallet have coin but i cannot send it . when send coin it show " The transaction was rejected ! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent , such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here " pls help me.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 118
LUX have always been better for Nvidia than AMD miners? Off course the AMD miners should be able to mine it, but it is quite saturated with hasrate at the moment.
With worse performance i dont see many AMD miners going for it even with a decent miner? But the option should be there, i agree on that.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252

If needed? Huh Huh

Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do?

I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users.
You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that.

After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term.


Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw.
For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know.


You see thats the thing i dont agree nor you, but the team up to this day. i know you are communicating the issues about the project, but here you are the projects face. The team have several people working on it and thats just fine. However you are earning quite a lot of money with masternodes and else when you thought of fork, you didnt ask the users for it if we agreed or not, you are the owner and do with it what you want and thats correct. But miners should have been ready before the fork, you cannot ask users to solve a problem you created without asking anybody.
when you look for upcoming upgrades you must be ready to have what it takes in the next step. It sounds to us that you forgot the amd miner or that actually thats not a priority, and thats why the price is lowering such an ammount as it is now.

Just a constructive criticism.
Thanks for your point of view, been taken into consideration.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0

If needed? Huh Huh

Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do?

I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users.
You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that.

After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term.


Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw.
For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know.


You see thats the thing i dont agree nor you, but the team up to this day. i know you are communicating the issues about the project, but here you are the projects face. The team have several people working on it and thats just fine. However you are earning quite a lot of money with masternodes and else when you thought of fork, you didnt ask the users for it if we agreed or not, you are the owner and do with it what you want and thats correct. But miners should have been ready before the fork, you cannot ask users to solve a problem you created without asking anybody.
when you look for upcoming upgrades you must be ready to have what it takes in the next step. It sounds to us that you forgot the amd miner or that actually thats not a priority, and thats why the price is lowering such an ammount as it is now.

Just a constructive criticism.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252

If needed? Huh Huh

Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do?

I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users.
You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that.

After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term.
While I not a coder, by "if needed" I mean that in some case our core guys might need to implement into current wallet some related with upcoming SC activation things, like missing tabs or might be something else. Not saying that will necessary happen but it might be. Anyway everything related with upcoming SC activation will be announced in advance right before block 350k passing.

Concerning AMD miner for PHI2 algo there was already mentioned that few respectfull AMD miner coders, including elbandi and few other experienced guys, were trying to make well working build for AMD gpus, but not really succeed, even our main cryptographer tpruvot, that for a second is nvidia cards specialist, was trying to make something real to please AMD guys... And partly succeed btw.
For now the only more or less well working AMD miner that we know is that one https://github.com/fancyIX/sgminer-phi2-branch/releases/tag/5.6.1.3.b , and if you have any other coder that can handle with that job please let us know.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0


After the last fork going so badly maybe people are nervous of the upcoming smart contract fork?
Or just lost their patience. Hard to know for sure.
[/quote]
There will be no SC fork, its been already implemented in last HF. Only SC activation expected at block 350k with might be new wallet release if needed.
[/quote]

If needed? Huh Huh

Another step where the team is not sure what is neccesary to do?

I supported the coin not from the start, but with the 20% of what it is now. After several wrong turns and truly dissapointing reboot in the hard fork, the team is not sure what i will be needed in the next step, and yet becoming almost 2 months where AMD MINERS cant get this coin as reds can, im doubting if the team is aware of what is concerning to users.
You cant just stand there saying that "amd algorythm is under development because the codification is harder to write for our develovers" more than 45 days after the phi2 was released. This is the only profitable coin that can be mined with one brand of cards and no with the other, the only one. You cant expect users to be happy with that.

After all this ill keep mining Eth waiting for all this mess is solved. i can no longer expect to be fixed in short term.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
i thinhk the falling price of Lux can definitely need a necessary boost in interest from traders and investors.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252
Guys,
please check your download links on https://luxcore.io/ - this one doesn't work: https://github.com/216k155/lux/releases
Thanks and best of luck with media campaign!
Thanks, team aware of that, github guys doing somekind of security maintenance so lux ripo for now temporary unavailable for community, only for developers. Hopefully will be up tomorrow.
Meanwhile here is alternative links to actual wallets
http://www.luxcore.io/files/v510.zip
http://luxcore.io/files/v510mac.zip

that does not work .. it does not connect and in the infos wallet 4.5 is displayed ... and why is the github page offline?

and why do not you get any stake for months?
Working fine for me,  if doesn't for you - here is link to migrated Lux ripo https://github.com/LUX-Core/lux/releases

Current POS blocks extraction level is still quite high https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/#!extraction, so assuming you didn't followed stake optimization guide?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/388703503973089301/435579436654526487/LUX_QT_How_to_Optimize_Staking_v0.1.pdf
Anyway staking estimates for now is stake per day with 2500 coins in wallet.
POS (as well as POW) difficulty can be tracked here https://explorer.luxcore.io
full member
Activity: 304
Merit: 100
Guys,
please check your download links on https://luxcore.io/ - this one doesn't work: https://github.com/216k155/lux/releases
Thanks and best of luck with media campaign!
Thanks, team aware of that, github guys doing somekind of security maintenance so lux ripo for now temporary unavailable for community, only for developers. Hopefully will be up tomorrow.
Meanwhile here is alternative links to actual wallets
http://www.luxcore.io/files/v510.zip
http://luxcore.io/files/v510mac.zip

that does not work .. it does not connect and in the infos wallet 4.5 is displayed ... and why is the github page offline?

and why do not you get any stake for months?
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252
Now we have a 2 at the front of the price, this is not good. Why such a loss of value, this coin has just delivered on what was promised. May have been some hiccups on the way but we got there and the price should have crashed straight after if it was that. I know everything is down atm but we have seen a halving in just a few weeks. Is this some big guys dumping?


After the last fork going so badly maybe people are nervous of the upcoming smart contract fork?
Or just lost their patience. Hard to know for sure.
There will be no SC fork, its been already implemented in last HF. Only SC activation expected at block 350k with might be new wallet release if needed.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 118
Now we have a 2 at the front of the price, this is not good. Why such a loss of value, this coin has just delivered on what was promised. May have been some hiccups on the way but we got there and the price should have crashed straight after if it was that. I know everything is down atm but we have seen a halving in just a few weeks. Is this some big guys dumping?


After the last fork going so badly maybe people are nervous of the upcoming smart contract fork?
Or just lost their patience. Hard to know for sure.
newbie
Activity: 225
Merit: 0
Now we have a 2 at the front of the price, this is not good. Why such a loss of value, this coin has just delivered on what was promised. May have been some hiccups on the way but we got there and the price should have crashed straight after if it was that. I know everything is down atm but we have seen a halving in just a few weeks. Is this some big guys dumping?
Pages:
Jump to: