Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19025. (Read 26709421 times)

legendary
Activity: 1844
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness!  They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage Smiley


Still showing your less than stellar brain capacity and leading with your ignorance. You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. But you should probably go back to your other threads you seem to mindlessly attack.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

Think past the obvious.......Now that your head is clear, formulate a query that actually shows you took some time to think....

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness!  They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
... you forgot the sad ether-pumpers who crawl out when it goes down too.

Because seeing the price rise from a single large order somehow confirms your point of view on the matter.

Hopefully we break upwards out of this enormous flag.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"

... you forgot the sad ether-pumpers who crawl out when it goes down too.
legendary
Activity: 1844
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

Think past the obvious.......Now that your head is clear, formulate a query that actually shows you took some time to think....
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?
legendary
Activity: 1844
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
Full astern!





Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

 
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100

Thank you Adam, you're the first Classic/2MB shill who has been polite enough to ask. Please leave.
Carlton, where have you been? Your direct approach was missing in some of these discussions (for a while).
Anyhow, you do make a point. The majority of the users do not like the people supporting controversial hard forks in addition to all of them being moved to the altcoin section. Things would be much more simpler if people like Veritas, Adam, etc. just left. Forums have been created to suit the needs of the people supporting such forks, they might as well use them.

Right on! We never liked him anyhow.

Bitcoin needs to shrink!
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
kinda feels like the next 24 hours are citiral

next two weeksTM are critical!
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
kinda feels like the next 24 hours are citiral
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
i have a 1GBps connection with unlimited bandwidth.

if we all hook on to my super fast internet we can scale bitcoin! 

 Grin luckily, Bitcoin network ... use than a "unlimited" connexion.
Like power, hard drive and ... smart developpment.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Quote
"In short, it's a great investment"
~David Andolfatto, Vice-President Fed Bank of St-Louis

http://andolfatto.blogspot.fr/2016/03/is-bitcoin-safe-asset.html

And yet there are still those who refuse to believe that Bitcoin is a honeypot Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Quote
"This brings me to Bitcoin. I think that Bitcoin could be the world's next great safe asset. At least, it certainly seems to have all the properties that are desired in a safe asset. "

"This "Bitcoin as a large-value transfer system" does not destroy my thesis: Bitcoin can remain a desirable safe asset. "

"Once market penetration is complete, its return behavior is likely to mimic the return behavior of any other safe asset."

"Investors can expect to earn unusually high returns in a crisis event."

"In short, it's a great investment"


~David Andolfatto, Vice-President Fed Bank of St-Louis


http://andolfatto.blogspot.fr/2016/03/is-bitcoin-safe-asset.html



full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
Meanwhile, in the world of the ineffable coin:


full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
...
bitcoin does scale!
...

Why price can't stay up on its own? Why it go all flaccid & droopy when pumping stops?
Huh


Bitcoin is hardly flaccid and droopy.

In early November 2015, we got a pump to $502... however, BTC prices have been largely between $360 and $460 thereafter.  I would hardly call those price dynamics flaccid and droopy.. instead I would call that "in a pretty decent place."


Yeah, sure, BTC prices may go back into the $300s and maybe even there could be another attempt at going below $350... but it is seeming less and less likely and more and more difficult to bring bitcoin below those seemingly firm price points.. There have been attempts to bring BTC prices below $400 in the past month, and even that has been seemingly difficult.. I would hardly call that flaccid and droopy.

In other words,



It's flaccid alright.
Flaccid. Limp and droopy, like a postcoital D.


You can repeat your conclusion all that you like, but you have no analysis, logic or facts in order to attempt to describe or support how you arrived at such a wishful-thinking conclusion.

You can't deny it's flaccid tho. And also tiny.
Disappointingly small Sad

legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
...
bitcoin does scale!
...

Why price can't stay up on its own? Why it go all flaccid & droopy when pumping stops?
Huh


Bitcoin is hardly flaccid and droopy.

In early November 2015, we got a pump to $502...
however, BTC prices have been largely between $360 and $460 thereafter.  I would hardly call those price dynamics flaccid and droopy.. instead I would call that "in a pretty decent place."


Yeah, sure, BTC prices may go back into the $300s and maybe even there could be another attempt at going below $350... but it is seeming less and less likely and more and more difficult to bring bitcoin below those seemingly firm price points.. There have been attempts to bring BTC prices below $400 in the past month, and even that has been seemingly difficult.. I would hardly call that flaccid and droopy.

In other words, BTC prices got pushed up to $502 and has stayed pretty resilient in the past about 5 months.  Looking good.


Marshal's Auction Pump of 2015.....


Your lil theory about the feds wanting to pump bitcoin makes little to no sense.

Contrary to your assumptions, bitcoin remains decentralized, and therefore the feds consider it as something that they would like to keep down rather than to pump......

Accordingly, those people pumping bitcoin from the $250s to $502 were largely speculators,  bulls and maybe even some bears who wanted to jump on the short term momentum train in order to be able to short at a higher price.... that group does not include fed bears because fed bears can print however the fuck much amount of money that they want, and they have NO incentive to attempt to make a few extra million off of the price difference in a marshall auction of less than 50k coins.

Snap out of your fantasy Mr. Aztec, and discontinue with your looney theories from Fantaztecminer.com


you think exactly what they want you to think.. i bet you think everything is just like on tv too don't you ??
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
the TCP window is NOT going to make a difference how much of the block is being used up.. the tcp window only means how big of a tcp block you are transmitting. in my case for jumbo frames, i am moving a 9014 tcp block rather than a 1500 tcp block .. its really only good for backups or moving large blocks of data.. it has ZERO to do with how many transactions is inside a bitcoin blackchain block . ok you all experts went way off into right field pop up with the tcp window thing and bitcoin scaling .

What I wrote is an analogy.

TCP's efficiency rises with increase in payload, as does bitcoin's (its payload being the value transacted).

You don't need 1000 packets of 60 bytes if you can send 1 packet with 60000 bytes. Doing it so in 1000x60 is problematic.

Likewise, you can send 1000 bitcoin txs of 0.0001 that are inefficient, or you can aggregate them and send them as a 0.1 BTC tx.

There is no reason sitting there complaining why the system won't process 1000 dust/spam txs of 0.0001 and saying "gimpedcoin  Cry"

The internet is not a failure because it scaled by aggregating data in less data "txs".


when the blocks are full then they are full. way you make it sound we dont need a fix for bitcoin to scale. all the talk about bitcoin not scaling... homeboy selling all his bitcoins in an epic rant.. all that stuff was for heck of it. the problem has disappeared now because we can just take all the micro-transactions and squash them into one big transaction and wala magic presto bitcoin . ok now bitcoin is fixed (see how easy that was) we can go ahead and rocket on up. no reason for us to stay below $500 now.. onward! my prediction should be broken this week with this new revelations about bitcoin .
there you go now you got it.


this sideways action at this range is break even on my cold storage. if goes down below $300 where it should be atm then that might be a buy.. if it rockets up i would be happy with you since my cold storage would increase in fiat value (not sure if this really matters though) .. i am just playing this out until obama is out of office .. i wont be liquidating cold storage bitcoins. i figure i have all kinds of room to talk lots of trash since my predictions are true.. bitcoin might very well stay within the $350-$500 range the entire rest of the year ... maybe it might make a move towards the end of the year as obamaturds prepares to be booted from wh .
sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
Replace Cash? Why wouldn't there be an institutional agenda to replace cash? Cash IS anonymous. It can go missing; inventory, sales, payroll, can all be adjusted using cash. People don't like paying taxes. Transactions recorded on a ledger have more difficulty being fudged. How do you implement negative interest rates when people are using cash? It's difficult. Bitcoin is amazing and I think we will see a bump around July but don't kid yourself the government wants it to succeed, or rather, their version, the one that allows data tracking on everything. The question then is which version is theirs and which is the liberty people's. (Maybe they all are?).  
Jump to: