Pages:
Author

Topic: (NSFW) From the lovely girls of ClassyCams we have a treat for you! - page 8. (Read 40488 times)

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
Eesh it's a webcam pic.  I think you're trying too hard my man.

Thank you. I was seeing stills, taken with "real cameras", I hardly ever saw any web-cam stills that weren't rather small like the ones on the model's page. So by the sound of it the effect is simply what webcam pictures look like when shown at this larger size.

(I never was a paying customer, so I only ever saw live feeds for like five or fifteen minutes or whatever that they gave out free passes for to new affiliates so the affiliate could see what they would be selling. That was way back in early days when they did it with tricks like streaming endless animated gifs, or maybe the very first deployments of actual streaming of some kind.)

-MarkM-
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
lol wow.  You think the people are fake or the signs?  I could see you thinking perhaps the signs were fake, but you honestly think I somehow made up these models in a simulator?  If that was the case, why would I link to her profile on the site?  Do you think the live models on cam are fake too?  You're an idiot.  People on the internet boggle my mind sometimes.

I don't think they are fake, I wondered how the images come out looking so fake despite having somehow been derived from actual photos of real live models. I wondered what kind of pcoressing produces that effect. I saw many many thousands of adult images back in the day and even glamour ones using some kind of soft-focus effect didn't produce that same kind of impression, nor did ones an "optimse images for the web" tool had trimmed down in size-in-bytes.

Indeed I visited one of the model's pages and at the smaller scale of the images there they didn't jump out at me as looking so artificial. SO maybe it is just the specific two images chosen rather than being an artifact added to images by processing. (For exampole in the top image the way the hair on the left is cut off looks a bit strange and its not clear how it relates to the window or frame or whatever behind her, and the rear view image lacks expanses of fleshtone so doesn't really provide much you can look closely at to see how real her features actually look.)

-MarkM-

Eesh it's a webcam pic.  I think you're trying too hard my man.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
I dont get why people would be negative to this site and similiar services taking bitcoins as payment.

Sure, I wont be a customer because I have no interest in it personally, but its obviously great news for bitcoin and the community.

Hope your site turns into a success! (and its due to the flood of bitcoin users Grin)
Much appreciated Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
lol wow.  You think the people are fake or the signs?  I could see you thinking perhaps the signs were fake, but you honestly think I somehow made up these models in a simulator?  If that was the case, why would I link to her profile on the site?  Do you think the live models on cam are fake too?  You're an idiot.  People on the internet boggle my mind sometimes.

I don't think they are fake, I wondered how the images come out looking so fake despite having somehow been derived from actual photos of real live models. I wondered what kind of pcoressing produces that effect. I saw many many thousands of adult images back in the day and even glamour ones using some kind of soft-focus effect didn't produce that same kind of impression, nor did ones an "optimse images for the web" tool had trimmed down in size-in-bytes.

Indeed I visited one of the model's pages and at the smaller scale of the images there they didn't jump out at me as looking so artificial. SO maybe it is just the specific two images chosen rather than being an artifact added to images by processing. (For exampole in the top image the way the hair on the left is cut off looks a bit strange and its not clear how it relates to the window or frame or whatever behind her, and the rear view image lacks expanses of fleshtone so doesn't really provide much you can look closely at to see how real her features actually look.)

-MarkM-
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Weird, those images look more like OpenSim simulations than actual real humans. Even photos reduced in resolution to put on the web used to look more realistic to me than those two above for some reason back when I worked with and for "adult sites". What is producing that effect? The cameras? Something you do in processing them for the web? Maybe even some artistic effect to deliberately make them more appealing to a niche audience that actually prefers anime or other at least slightly unreal-looking models? I am genuinely curious how it is done.

-MarkM-

lol wow.  You think the people are fake or the signs?  I could see you thinking perhaps the signs were fake, but you honestly think I somehow made up these models in a simulator?  If that was the case, why would I link to her profile on the site?  Do you think the live models on cam are fake too?  You're an idiot.  People on the internet boggle my mind sometimes.

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
You're fat, because you dont have any pics on FB
photoshopped....
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
Weird, those images look more like OpenSim simulations than actual real humans. Even photos reduced in resolution to put on the web used to look more realistic to me than those two above for some reason back when I worked with and for "adult sites". What is producing that effect? The cameras? Something you do in processing them for the web? Maybe even some artistic effect to deliberately make them more appealing to a niche audience that actually prefers anime or other at least slightly unreal-looking models? I am genuinely curious how it is done.

-MarkM-
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Currently all models are paid in USD but as we integrate bitcoins more that should change.
hero member
Activity: 495
Merit: 507
I wholly endorse this and hope you succeed. Just out of curiosity when models are paid bitcoins what percentage of profit goes to them?

Thank you sir.  Models get anywhere from 50-70% which is the highest out there.  We try to real in the high end models by paying out the highest percentages.

I think the better question was if the ladies were paid in fiat or bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Some Bitcoiners put the J in INTJ.
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
I don't get why would anyone have a problem with this kind of service.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
It seems like that should work. Usually companies reel in the best employees by offering the best wages and perks. Same thing haha
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
I wholly endorse this and hope you succeed. Just out of curiosity when models are paid bitcoins what percentage of profit goes to them?

Thank you sir.  Models get anywhere from 50-70% which is the highest out there.  We try to real in the high end models by paying out the highest percentages.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Explain to me how a webcam is low class?

Maybe you mean sluts on webcam?

That's what I'm trying to change.  The image that you have in your head right now.  Just like there are high end products and low end products.  There are sites with not so classy models and there are sites with high end educated non foreign models who don't throw dildos in their vaginas for 1000s of users in their rooms for free.

It does not matter to me what models look like, where they are from, what gender they are, etc, etc.  Indeed, it's not the models themselves which are much of a factor.  Just like with prostitutes, I have some respect for them in that they are able to capitalize on low class people who will, for whatever reason, give them money.  That is more what I ment.

Now my attitude may sound a bit judgmental.  Normally I try to avoid being so.  I could probably enjoy web cam stuff myself if I were not either paying for it or being paid for it.  Maybe open-source is the way to go?  Whatever the case on-line porn seems more convenient and flexible than either sex with a real live woman or web cam wanking.  And thankfully there is plenty of it.



If you were an advocate of webcam models, you would understand more of which would appeal to you.  It's ok if you're not into it or don't understand it.  Not everyone is.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
I wholly endorse this and hope you succeed. Just out of curiosity when models are paid bitcoins what percentage of profit goes to them?
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
Explain to me how a webcam is low class?

Maybe you mean sluts on webcam?

That's what I'm trying to change.  The image that you have in your head right now.  Just like there are high end products and low end products.  There are sites with not so classy models and there are sites with high end educated non foreign models who don't throw dildos in their vaginas for 1000s of users in their rooms for free.

It does not matter to me what models look like, where they are from, what gender they are, etc, etc.  Indeed, it's not the models themselves which are much of a factor.  Just like with prostitutes, I have some respect for them in that they are able to capitalize on low class people who will, for whatever reason, give them money.  That is more what I ment.

Now my attitude may sound a bit judgmental.  Normally I try to avoid being so.  I could probably enjoy web cam stuff myself if I were not either paying for it or being paid for it.  Maybe open-source is the way to go?  Whatever the case on-line porn seems more convenient and flexible than either sex with a real live woman or web cam wanking.  And thankfully there is plenty of it.

newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Explain to me how a webcam is low class?

Maybe you mean sluts on webcam?

That's what I'm trying to change.  The image that you have in your head right now.  Just like there are high end products and low end products.  There are sites with not so classy models and there are sites with high end educated non foreign models who don't throw dildos in their vaginas for 1000s of users in their rooms for free.
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283

I love the name 'ClassyCams'.  If I had to choose one thing which is the epitome of low class it very well could be a web cam.  To each his own though.

newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Lol paying $1.99 to watch a girl. This is 2013 for gods sake.
Correction, free to watch a girl.  $1.99 to get a show.  There's a difference.
Pages:
Jump to: