Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 318. (Read 1276904 times)

sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
Friendly reminder that it is even easier to trade on the DEX using XBTC with Counterwallet.

I'm working hard to bring the fully automated service online. You can still try out the service in the meantime by sending a minimum of 0.1 BTC to MaxMint (1% fee for now, 0.1% + TX when the fully automated service is up):

13sGFVPgcrj9mMRokyXztdAJtg6kReofdV

Full details and updates in https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,160

Here's how easy it is to get started with Counterwallet. No more worries about btcpay, no more worries about understanding required and provided fees!





That's it! Just wait for your send to be included in a block and for MaxMint to process your order. I'm sure you'll like trading on the DEX  Smiley

Edit: Bonus points - check the XBTC/XCP order book at http://www.blockscan.com/order_book.aspx?f=2
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder

13J6wg7BdvjnPHHRPUp1EQBx6Z7KW5RcZw definitely is strange. There is no record in counterpartyd logs for transfers of XCP to this address. I'd say that it couldn't be a coincidence that there is a send of 0.5 UNIT.

I'd need more context for 17Vxv31VfpFY6tWBBB93tcSgP4SYeqzTTb. It's possible for that to be just a mistake from the command line. You don't have to btcpay from the address you originally made the order.

Yep, there was a bug, which we've now fixed. (See that thread for more info.)
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250

13J6wg7BdvjnPHHRPUp1EQBx6Z7KW5RcZw definitely is strange. There is no record in counterpartyd logs for transfers of XCP to this address. I'd say that it couldn't be a coincidence that there is a send of 0.5 UNIT.

I'd need more context for 17Vxv31VfpFY6tWBBB93tcSgP4SYeqzTTb. It's possible for that to be just a mistake from the command line. You don't have to btcpay from the address you originally made the order.
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
Hi guys. With the Counterwallet mainnet release behind us, I've made my identity public to facilitate the continued evolution of Counterparty as we enter the next stage of growth.

Please see our blog post on this matter at: https://www.counterparty.co/next-steps/

I just wanted to let you know that the great work you've achieved in this time is appreciated from myself and I'm sure from many in the Counterparty community.

I'm looking forward to hearing more from yourself in the future. I think if you had the time, you could add mountains of value to the projects that are starting to pop up around the Counterparty ecosystem.
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 101
'Mike "I invented smart property" Hearn'...
sr. member
Activity: 386
Merit: 250
Mike Hearn on upcoming Bitcoin protocol updates:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XxB03SfGbU

Does anyone know more about the payment protocol part that he is referring to here at 5:40? It sounds like it is relevant to the OP_RETURN data size issue.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
Hi guys. With the Counterwallet mainnet release behind us, I've made my identity public to facilitate the continued evolution of Counterparty as we enter the next stage of growth.

Please see our blog post on this matter at: https://www.counterparty.co/next-steps/

wow, so the rumor floating around the msc thread is true
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
Hi guys. With the Counterwallet mainnet release behind us, I've made my identity public to facilitate the continued evolution of Counterparty as we enter the next stage of growth.

Please see our blog post on this matter at: https://www.counterparty.co/next-steps/

Great to see this. You know that the Counterparty and XCP already have a good Chinese name in the community: 合约协议(Counterparty)and 合约币(XCP)。Follow up the weibo 520Bit.
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Hi, have there been any updates on the topic of XCP and Bitcoin blockchain & devs?

Pay-to-script-hash or Pay-to-PubKeyHash?

full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
Announcement: Counterwallet will be going down for an hour to deal with HeartBleed.
full member
Activity: 220
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
Hi guys. With the Counterwallet mainnet release behind us, I've made my identity public to facilitate the continued evolution of Counterparty as we enter the next stage of growth.

Please see our blog post on this matter at: https://www.counterparty.co/next-steps/
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
What version of OpenSSL was Bitcoin 0.8.6 using ?
+1
Should we be upgrading our Bitcion-qt to 0.9.1. If so will it affect Counterparty installation.

no unless you are opening SSL access on your RPC
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
What version of OpenSSL was Bitcoin 0.8.6 using ?
+1
Should we be upgrading our Bitcion-qt to 0.9.1. If so will it affect Counterparty installation.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
when i write to the blockchain using xcp's transmit function, for say, issuing an asset or offering a trade on the dex, from an address that has more btc than is spent on a single transmit, where does the change go?

is there a way to "aim" that change toward an address of my choosing (perhaps the address that preforms the transmit)?

btw, xcp is awesome Smiley

edit: spelling
Change will return back to the same address (sending address)
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
when i write to the blockchain using xcp's transmit function, for say, issuing an asset or offering a trade on the dex, from an address that has more btc than is spent on a single transmit, where does the change go?

is there a way to "aim" that change toward an address of my choosing (perhaps the address that preforms the transmit)?

btw, xcp is awesome Smiley

edit: spelling
Jump to: