Pages:
Author

Topic: [INTEREST CHECK] Alpen Coin "Scam Coin" serie 2 - page 3. (Read 1505 times)

copper member
Activity: 1118
Merit: 477
Wow this thread is getting interesting. I like the first coin system. As far as the other one. It's a cool idea. I'm not against it. I think these coins shold be fun, not a buy and hodl it's a raffle/game. Let's have some fun with it. The coins can be rebuilt later. I'm sure the holos can be provided if needed. I just feel we are getting away from the whole point of these coins if we just buy and hold and no one peels. I understand the idea of if no one does we can think they are all loaded with 04 but that wasn't the point. The point was to have fun with it. Not saying I don't agree with the part of if we all hold it. But just saying this was started as a fun way to play with the scams that we all felt in some type of way and now it's getting away from that.

Just my opinion and no disrespect. I think rebuilding a coin destroys it. Its like doing touch up painting on the mona lisa, or cleaning an old coin, or refinishing antique furniture. 10 years from now this coin will be legend.
copper member
Activity: 750
Merit: 114
Wow this thread is getting interesting. I like the first coin system. As far as the other one. It's a cool idea. I'm not against it. I think these coins shold be fun, not a buy and hodl it's a raffle/game. Let's have some fun with it. The coins can be rebuilt later. I'm sure the holos can be provided if needed. I just feel we are getting away from the whole point of these coins if we just buy and hold and no one peels. I understand the idea of if no one does we can think they are all loaded with 04 but that wasn't the point. The point was to have fun with it. Not saying I don't agree with the part of if we all hold it. But just saying this was started as a fun way to play with the scams that we all felt in some type of way and now it's getting away from that.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2541
EIN: 82-3893490
the point of these coins has been lost if the idea is that all coins be loaded and remain loaded.

the theme is "REKT"

the winner is in fact the "scammer" if you think about it.

SBF took everyones money.

what was coin one? everyone lost their funding except the winner - "SBF".

yogg randomly swept cards removing balances - some were able to beat him to it.

what is coin two? coins will be randomly swept - if you are lucky you can be the winner - "Yogg". if you are fast enough you can save your funds.


the coins - the process to funding/not funding/sweeping etc is to follow the theme of the conmen who the coins are modeled after.

Now that all said and done.

A 3rd coin modeled after Titan and their 2FA shenanigans - if we were to do that, I would say all the coins should be funded at (what is the amount he gave? 42%?) the same percentage Tim is paying out - with one coin getting  the rest - the winner would be "Tim"

The idea of lucky & fast enough to save your funds wouldn’t be fair bc someone in Europe for example may be waiting an extra week to receive their coin.

well to be fair, it should not be started until everyone has their coins of course.
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 562
Nobody dies a virgin… Life fucks us all.
the point of these coins has been lost if the idea is that all coins be loaded and remain loaded.

the theme is "REKT"

the winner is in fact the "scammer" if you think about it.

SBF took everyones money.

what was coin one? everyone lost their funding except the winner - "SBF".

yogg randomly swept cards removing balances - some were able to beat him to it.

what is coin two? coins will be randomly swept - if you are lucky you can be the winner - "Yogg". if you are fast enough you can save your funds.


the coins - the process to funding/not funding/sweeping etc is to follow the theme of the conmen who the coins are modeled after.

Now that all said and done.

A 3rd coin modeled after Titan and their 2FA shenanigans - if we were to do that, I would say all the coins should be funded at (what is the amount he gave? 42%?) the same percentage Tim is paying out - with one coin getting  the rest - the winner would be "Tim"

The idea of lucky & fast enough to save your funds wouldn’t be fair bc someone in Europe for example may be waiting an extra week to receive their coin.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2541
EIN: 82-3893490
the point of these coins has been lost if the idea is that all coins be loaded and remain loaded.

the theme is "REKT"

the winner is in fact the "scammer" if you think about it.

SBF took everyones money.

what was coin one? everyone lost their funding except the winner - "SBF".

yogg randomly swept cards removing balances - some were able to beat him to it.

what is coin two? coins will be randomly swept - if you are lucky you can be the winner - "Yogg". if you are fast enough you can save your funds.


the coins - the process to funding/not funding/sweeping etc is to follow the theme of the conmen who the coins are modeled after.

Now that all said and done.

A 3rd coin modeled after Titan and their 2FA shenanigans - if we were to do that, I would say all the coins should be funded at (what is the amount he gave? 42%?) the same percentage Tim is paying out - with one coin getting  the rest - the winner would be "Tim"
hero member
Activity: 2450
Merit: 668
Community management 24/7 for hire
To make it a real Yogg maker should sweep the loaded one  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
  
   My preference would be as pinky stated ALL Rekk Coin with tiny amount such as  .001 example . & one Lucky basta(F-yogg)ejee with get Greater amount on just on 1 Coin. Can be same amount as the Rekk coin  .04 BTC Wink
 
   But at the end of the day Frank decides and whatever he decides I will go with as these coin series are an important part of our collectable history and thus I will be a buyer till the end......and of course I was a victim as well so its personal as well.

  I would hope there will be other coins down the line as there were plenty other coin makers that have fucked good people as well.

  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/info-breached-or-scam-coin-makers-list-3315347

   Cheers and and thanks again for taking this task Frank
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 607
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.

yes all coins start off with sats and then one by one they are swept until only one is left and that one is the winner.

then as the weeks go by we would know who peeled and swept their own coins as there would be nothing to take if their number came up.

I believe there needs to be a vote as there is no consensus.

the coin maker has the decision. the buyers vote with their wallet - whether they buy it or not.


Of course Frank makes the decision, but it seems like he would like community input based off his comments.  This would ensure the direction of coin is not commandeered.

agreed - Frank does have the final say.

And no one is commandeering the coin.

I never said anyone was commandeering the coin but rather the ensuring against such.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2541
EIN: 82-3893490
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.

yes all coins start off with sats and then one by one they are swept until only one is left and that one is the winner.

then as the weeks go by we would know who peeled and swept their own coins as there would be nothing to take if their number came up.

I believe there needs to be a vote as there is no consensus.

the coin maker has the decision. the buyers vote with their wallet - whether they buy it or not.


Of course Frank makes the decision, but it seems like he would like community input based off his comments.  This would ensure the direction of coin is not commandeered.

agreed - Frank does have the final say.

And no one is commandeering the coin.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 607
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.

yes all coins start off with sats and then one by one they are swept until only one is left and that one is the winner.

then as the weeks go by we would know who peeled and swept their own coins as there would be nothing to take if their number came up.

I believe there needs to be a vote as there is no consensus.

the coin maker has the decision. the buyers vote with their wallet - whether they buy it or not.


Of course Frank makes the decision, but it seems like he would like community input based off his comments.  This would ensure the direction of coin is not commandeered.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2541
EIN: 82-3893490
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.

yes all coins start off with sats and then one by one they are swept until only one is left and that one is the winner.

then as the weeks go by we would know who peeled and swept their own coins as there would be nothing to take if their number came up.

I believe there needs to be a vote as there is no consensus.

the coin maker has the decision. the buyers vote with their wallet - whether they buy it or not.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 607
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.

yes all coins start off with sats and then one by one they are swept until only one is left and that one is the winner.

then as the weeks go by we would know who peeled and swept their own coins as there would be nothing to take if their number came up.

I believe there needs to be a vote as there is no consensus.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2541
EIN: 82-3893490
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.

yes all coins start off with sats and then one by one they are swept until only one is left and that one is the winner.

then as the weeks go by we would know who peeled and swept their own coins as there would be nothing to take if their number came up.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 607
I agree that there should be at least 40 coins and these should be in line with Frank's interest, which is this time that all coins contain some Sats.  I outlined previously how this could be done along with the "scam"/"rekt".  I wouldn't be opposed to a higher mintage based off of interest, plus it would make the amount on the "winning" coin higher.
full member
Activity: 384
Merit: 124
I disagree.

The 39 rekt and 1 winner is ideal to represent what these scammers did.

everyone got rekt except the 1 who did not.

these coins should follow that same path.



and to your point @pinky1234

to change from 40 to 21 would then rule out almost half of those who bought the first from being able to have the second.

I think we should stick with 40, and those that bought the first should have rights to get the second - if they give up their number then that should allow someone else to be able to get it.




21 coin in total  was an example eeje.  Cheesy  .   i dont want to change subject  dont wanna talk about F- YOG  .  But if everyone's agree following REkk-1  path then . LEt it be  Cool
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2541
EIN: 82-3893490
I disagree.

The 39 rekt and 1 winner is ideal to represent what these scammers did.

everyone got rekt except the 1 who did not.

these coins should follow that same path.



and to your point @pinky1234

to change from 40 to 21 would then rule out almost half of those who bought the first from being able to have the second.

I think we should stick with 40, and those that bought the first should have rights to get the second - if they give up their number then that should allow someone else to be able to get it.
full member
Activity: 384
Merit: 124
Confirming interest in this, ideally with matching serial to the ftx coin.

two things:
1. How about this time go with the route Krogoth, 2stout and others opted for in the ftx thread? Rect coins still with a tiny amount of funds, so buyers do actually hold a true loaded Bitcoin collectible?

2. I’ll repeat my concern regarding the fact this is giving a scammer extra immortality by a dedictaed collectible coin. Personally I am fine with it because of the trade-off which is something good and unique coming out of the scam. But would be interested on other collector’s input on this.
.


I totally into this , Agree with Krogoth  ALL Rekk Coin with tiny amount such as  .001 example . & one Lucky basta(F-yogg)ejee with get Greater amount on just on 1 Coin. Can be same amount as the Rekk coin  .04 BTC Wink


20 coin REKK--- . 001
1 lucky B-  .04

total coin 21

this is just numbers here
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1403
Disobey.
Confirming interest in this, ideally with matching serial to the ftx coin.

two things:
1. How about this time go with the route Krogoth, 2stout and others opted for in the ftx thread? Rect coins still with a tiny amount of funds, so buyers do actually hold a true loaded Bitcoin collectible?

2. I’ll repeat my concern regarding the fact this is giving a scammer extra immortality by a dedictaed collectible coin. Personally I am fine with it because of the trade-off which is something good and unique coming out of the scam. But would be interested on other collector’s input on this.
legendary
Activity: 1244
Merit: 1075
Not sure how I missed this thread until now. Consider me interested. I got SBF coin #14.
Geo
hero member
Activity: 617
Merit: 592
Interest List updated.

We will see how the scam will happen. Will discuss with mj, mopar... and check the comments on the thread...

If anyone is interested, you can comment here or write a dm. I will add you to the list... I will wait till the end of the week, or next week.

Pages:
Jump to: