Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 27964. (Read 26711635 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.

Okay, now that's one of the most absurd misapplications of business cycle theory that I've ever seen.


Is it? Who owns the most Bitcoins right now? Capitalists with experience in wealth creation outside of Bitcoin? No. It's largely people like me who bought them by maxing out credit cards. So how do capitalists acquire capital? Do they enrich reckless speculators or wait until the speculators are forced to partially or completely liquidate? 

I'm not saying I know that a sufficient number of coins hasn't already changed hands. That's possible, but what's certain is that selling pressure continues until all the people with the need to sell have sold. The people with the need to sell are people with negative cash flow outside of Bitcoin appreciation.

Is your capital structured is such a way that time is your friend or your enemy? If you are positioned well, you shouldn't care if the market goes up down or sideways.


Hopefully you have learned by your own words that it is NOT good to be overly leveraged in BTC b/c that could cause BTC to transfer from your hands to the hands of others at a loss to you.  You frequently claim that you are NOT one of those people who get taken advantage of in the investment world.. but you als o assert that you are engaging in heavily leveraged behaviors.. which could come back to bite you in the butt if you are NOT careful.. ... accordingly, your butt will get burnt if you overly leverage in bitcoin and you are NOT able to manipulate prices.

Yes, I have learned at some expense. I have recouped my initial investment with enough profit to endure a prolonged bear market should it be necessary. The BTC I have in cold storage will have to be sufficient if an unexpected rally prevents me from adding to my holdings.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


OK cheaper coins coming in, but not that I have $22,000 per day to invest, but that is not a lot of cash globally needed to come in to the average exchange to keep demand higher than production.
I'm banking supply dries up when AM gen3 chips are implemented and push up that difficulty.


In my thinking pushing up mining difficulty does NOT necessarily affect the BTC supply, it only concentrates the BTC supply into a smaller number of hands.    A smaller number  of miners holding BTC may mean that they are more likely to liquidate their coins, as part of their business model,.... rather than HODL.... or in the end, whether they HODL or dump could be a wash.... in other words it is NOT clear that increasing difficulty increases directly affects whether BTC are dumped or HODL'd.

Calm down.  They never said they had 385k -- that's his total gross.  That's ~$200 million in todays valuation.  If they had found that many, this arrest would be front page news.  He probably spent most of the coins or has them hidden away.  Since no specific numbers of impounded assets were mentioned, its possible that all they have (and sold) is his portion of the SR coins.  They can't sell those coins until they get a conviction, right?  Its not their coins until the conviction.  This guy pleading guilty freed up his SR coins...



I think that your response was meant to be directed at another post.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women

I don't claim to be an expert in any of these various economic theories, but there seems to be some sense in what BJA is saying - apart from his having to feel some kind of irresistible urge to dish out insults regarding the competency and/or intelligence of regular people.

I do believe that the status quo wealthy will put up quite a bit of a battle in any redistribution of wealth attempts in order that redistribution of wealth is only minimum..

In other words the status quo wealthy use any tools at their disposal by hook or by crook to ensure that redistribution of wealth does NOT leave them hanging high and dry.  They may NOT be too successful with bitcoin b/c the train may leave some of them, but they are going to put up several obstacles along the way and secretly board at later stops.

I think it is quite possible bordering on probable that I am one of the incompetents I am referring to. It's not intended as an insult. It's just part of the theory.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins

The following is a quote from the article.

"conducted more than 10,000 transactions on the black market website, earning 385,000 BTC in the process."

This does not mean that he still had the 385k btc.  Is this gross or net?  did he spend any?  How many did the govt actually get their hands on?  The govt will use the biggest #s possible for the biggest PR effect.  

ETA: that is an avg of ~40 btc per transaction LOL
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins

Bitcoins are fungible, so even if they don't get dumped on the market, other coins that would have otherwise gone to the purchasers of the seized coins will get dumped on the market. Mathematically it is irrelevant if the result is selling pressure or lack of buying pressure. There is a downward price effect on the market either way.



+1 Same goes for 200,000 Gox BTCs to be liquidated.

And US goverment has now more than  500,000 BTC ?!? 30+k from Silk Road, 130+ personal Ullbricht stash plus 385k from this new drug dealer?

This. The amount of seized BTC that has  to be auctioned and dumped on the market is so high... At least 400K (GOX+Silk+others), if not more, probably sold well under $250 for each coin, ready to be dumped on the market at any point. Truth is, even a relatively small 20K dump could totally crash BTC's value to $50/coin.

I could literally wake up one day and see BTC's value drop 50%. This will kill BTC's  long term value, seriously scary stuff

bold emphasis mine

I don't think that the redistribution of a paltry 400,000 coins will "kill" bitoin's long term value.

just another bump in the road

(edit - ok "paltry" was a bad choice of words, what I should have said is "the redistribution of coins from the people that want to sell to the people that want to buy will not "kill" bitcoin. In fact, it is a good thing.")

I was not saying anything about future repercussions - just begin to absorb the fact.

US goverment is in the possession of more than 5% world supply of bitcoins   Angry Surprising. Scary. Not was bitcoin was suppossed to be ...

Perhaps that is why fed were so surprisingly friendly toward BTC? At least until they will sell?
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins


I doubt that they are going to sell or liquidate those coins in large quantities, unless they are assured to get close to retail or above retail for them.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.

Okay, now that's one of the most absurd misapplications of business cycle theory that I've ever seen.


Is it? Who owns the most Bitcoins right now? Capitalists with experience in wealth creation outside of Bitcoin? No. It's largely people like me who bought them by maxing out credit cards. So how do capitalists acquire capital? Do they enrich reckless speculators or wait until the speculators are forced to partially or completely liquidate? 

I'm not saying I know that a sufficient number of coins hasn't already changed hands. That's possible, but what's certain is that selling pressure continues until all the people with the need to sell have sold. The people with the need to sell are people with negative cash flow outside of Bitcoin appreciation.

Is your capital structured is such a way that time is your friend or your enemy? If you are positioned well, you shouldn't care if the market goes up down or sideways.


Hopefully you have learned by your own words that it is NOT good to be overly leveraged in BTC b/c that could cause BTC to transfer from your hands to the hands of others at a loss to you.  You frequently claim that you are NOT one of those people who get taken advantage of in the investment world.. but you als o assert that you are engaging in heavily leveraged behaviors.. which could come back to bite you in the butt if you are NOT careful.. ... accordingly, your butt will get burnt if you overly leverage in bitcoin and you are NOT able to manipulate prices.






legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000


OK cheaper coins coming in, but not that I have $22,000 per day to invest, but that is not a lot of cash globally needed to come in to the average exchange to keep demand higher than production.
I'm banking supply dries up when AM gen3 chips are implemented and push up that difficulty.


In my thinking pushing up mining difficulty does NOT necessarily affect the BTC supply, it only concentrates the BTC supply into a smaller number of hands.    A smaller number  of miners holding BTC may mean that they are more likely to liquidate their coins, as part of their business model,.... rather than HODL.... or in the end, whether they HODL or dump could be a wash.... in other words it is NOT clear that increasing difficulty increases directly affects whether BTC are dumped or HODL'd.
Yes exactly, AM has good cash flow and a good proportion of the coins fly to share holders. The new distribution = small change in information. But SR and GOX coins are another story.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
by the way, does anyone know the price that the Winklebros bought in at?
In this CNBC video, they confirm they they started accumulating in the single digits.  

In some other interview, I remember them saying "high single digits."


Seems like the Wiklevos bros did NOT get GOXed.... at least, NOT directly. 

All of us bitcoin users or bitcoin user wann-a-bees were indirectly goxed to some extent.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.

Okay, now that's one of the most absurd misapplications of business cycle theory that I've ever seen.


I don't claim to be an expert in any of these various economic theories, but there seems to be some sense in what BJA is saying - apart from his having to feel some kind of irresistible urge to dish out insults regarding the competency and/or intelligence of regular people.

I do believe that the status quo wealthy will put up quite a bit of a battle in any redistribution of wealth attempts in order that redistribution of wealth is only minimum..

In other words the status quo wealthy use any tools at their disposal by hook or by crook to ensure that redistribution of wealth does NOT leave them hanging high and dry.  They may NOT be too successful with bitcoin b/c the train may leave some of them, but they are going to put up several obstacles along the way and secretly board at later stops.
sr. member
Activity: 502
Merit: 251
It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.

Okay, now that's one of the most absurd misapplications of business cycle theory that I've ever seen.


Is it? Who owns the most Bitcoins right now? Capitalists with experience in wealth creation outside of Bitcoin? No. It's largely people like me who bought them by maxing out credit cards. So how do capitalists acquire capital? Do they enrich reckless speculators or wait until the speculators are forced to partially or completely liquidate? 

I'm not saying I know that a sufficient number of coins hasn't already changed hands. That's possible, but what's certain is that selling pressure continues until all the people with the need to sell have sold. The people with the need to sell are people with negative cash flow outside of Bitcoin appreciation.

Is your capital structured is such a way that time is your friend or your enemy? If you are positioned well, you shouldn't care if the market goes up down or sideways.

Post of the month.

Every newjack should heed this advice if long-term success is your goal. Not just for btc, but overall investing.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins

Bitcoins are fungible, so even if they don't get dumped on the market, other coins that would have otherwise gone to the purchasers of the seized coins will get dumped on the market. Mathematically it is irrelevant if the result is selling pressure or lack of buying pressure. There is a downward price effect on the market either way.



+1 Same goes for 200,000 Gox BTCs to be liquidated.

And US goverment has now more than  500,000 BTC ?!? 30+k from Silk Road, 130+ personal Ullbricht stash plus 385k from this new drug dealer?

This. The amount of seized BTC that has  to be auctioned and dumped on the market is so high... At least 400K (GOX+Silk+others), if not more, probably sold well under $250 for each coin, ready to be dumped on the market at any point. Truth is, even a relatively small 20K dump could totally crash BTC's value to $50/coin.

I could literally wake up one day and see BTC's value drop 50%. This will kill BTC's  long term value, seriously scary stuff

bold emphasis mine

I don't think that the redistribution of a paltry 400,000 coins will "kill" bitoin's long term value.

just another bump in the road

(edit - ok "paltry" was a bad choice of words, what I should have said is "the redistribution of coins from the people that want to sell to the people that want to buy will not "kill" bitcoin. In fact, it is a good thing.")
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins

Bitcoins are fungible, so even if they don't get dumped on the market, other coins that would have otherwise gone to the purchasers of the seized coins will get dumped on the market. Mathematically it is irrelevant if the result is selling pressure or lack of buying pressure. There is a downward price effect on the market either way.



+1 Same goes for 200,000 Gox BTCs to be liquidated.

And US goverment has now more than  500,000 BTC ?!? 30+k from Silk Road, 130+ personal Ullbricht stash plus 385k from this new drug dealer?

This. The amount of seized BTC that has  to be auctioned and dumped on the market is so high... At least 400K (GOX+Silk+others), if not more, probably sold well under $250 for each coin, ready to be dumped on the market at any point. Truth is, even a relatively small 20K dump could totally crash BTC's value to $50/coin.

I could literally wake up one day and see BTC's value drop 50%. This will kill BTC's  long term value, seriously scary stuff
there will always be some sort of drop possibilty in the price. in reality even the usd could lose 50% of its value by tommarow morning and all hell would break lose. and if btc price did drop 50% i really think bitcoin would stay low and even crash. too many investers and not enough users.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Quote
the government has already sold more than $3m in the proceeds from Slomps’ crimes, Assistant US Attorney Randall Samborn told CoinDesk
It is certain that those "proceeds" that were sold were bitcoins?  Could they be euros, merchandise, etc.?

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins

Bitcoins are fungible, so even if they don't get dumped on the market, other coins that would have otherwise gone to the purchasers of the seized coins will get dumped on the market. Mathematically it is irrelevant if the result is selling pressure or lack of buying pressure. There is a downward price effect on the market either way.



+1 Same goes for 200,000 Gox BTCs to be liquidated.

And US goverment has now more than  500,000 BTC ?!? 30+k from Silk Road, 130+ personal Ullbricht stash plus 385k from this new drug dealer?

This. The amount of seized BTC that has  to be auctioned and dumped on the market is so high... At least 400K (GOX+Silk+others), if not more, probably sold well under $250 for each coin, ready to be dumped on the market at any point. Truth is, even a relatively small 20K dump could totally crash BTC's value to $50/coin.

I could literally wake up one day and see BTC's value drop 50%. This will kill BTC's  long term value, seriously scary stuff
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010


OK cheaper coins coming in, but not that I have $22,000 per day to invest, but that is not a lot of cash globally needed to come in to the average exchange to keep demand higher than production.
I'm banking supply dries up when AM gen3 chips are implemented and push up that difficulty.


In my thinking pushing up mining difficulty does NOT necessarily affect the BTC supply, it only concentrates the BTC supply into a smaller number of hands.    A smaller number  of miners holding BTC may mean that they are more likely to liquidate their coins, as part of their business model,.... rather than HODL.... or in the end, whether they HODL or dump could be a wash.... in other words it is NOT clear that increasing difficulty increases directly affects whether BTC are dumped or HODL'd.

Calm down.  They never said they had 385k -- that's his total gross.  That's ~$200 million in todays valuation.  If they had found that many, this arrest would be front page news.  He probably spent most of the coins or has them hidden away.  Since no specific numbers of impounded assets were mentioned, its possible that all they have (and sold) is his portion of the SR coins.  They can't sell those coins until they get a conviction, right?  Its not their coins until the conviction.  This guy pleading guilty freed up his SR coins...

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Chinese Slumber Method prediction for Tuesday April 29

Prediction valid for: Tuesday 2014-04-29, 19:00--19:59 UTC (not before, not after)
Huobi's predicted price: 2684 CNY
Bitstamp's predicted price: 443 USD





[ Plot legend ]

The data point from yesterday (Sunday Apr/27 19:00-19:50 UTC) was one of the worst on record: Huobi had little volume during the day, but traded heavily during the night (S = 0.0343, W practically zero).  Today's data point however was fairly good (S = 0.0037, W = 0.758).  Two choices for the trend seemed reasonable, the trivial "tomorrow like today" predictor (which would give 2715 CNY), or a straight line trend fitted by weighted least squares to the last four points (which would ignore yesterday's given its low weight).  I chose the latter, namely A + B*(d-d0), where d-d0 is the number of days since Apr/25, A = 2836.60 and B = -38.22.

The Bitstamp prediction, as usual, is the Huobi prediction divided by the currency conversion factor R, which was assumed to be 6.06 CNY/USD. It was 6.05, 6.09, and 6.05 for the last three Slumber Times, skipping yesterday's.
 
Checking the previous prediction

Prediction was posted on: Saturday 2014-04-26, 22:21 UTC
Prediction was valid for: Sunday 2014-04-27, 19:00--19:59 UTC (~21 hours later)

Foiled again by the treacherous Chinese. But I got the right digits, only in the wrong order: Cheesy

Huobi's predicted price: 2876 CNY
Huobi's actual price (L+H)/2: 2678 CNY
Error: 198 CNY (~33 USD)

Bitstamp's predicted price: 471 USD
Bitstamp's actual price (L+H)/2: 440 USD
Error: 31 USD
 
NOTE: "A rich man is nothing but a poor man with money." -- W. C. Fields
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
its already turned around its just not Obvious yet.

price is NOT high, and its not going lower.

Winklebros bought a long time ago, we were in the teens i think

That's what Rpietila said.   Cheesy
Jump to: