btw. whats about the idea supporting p2p pools somehow..? masternode donation seems quite interesting..
whats evans opinion?
whats evans opinion?
As owner of three masternodes I strongly disagree with redistribution of MN income.
Let the market decide whether P2P pool will be used or not - the key is to improve the user experience and make
it accessible to total Linux newbies not to bribe the users to mine there.
Linux newbies? bribe? say what? ... no way man. In my proposal I merely suggest that a MN owner could choose to contribute and incentivise the use of p2pool. What is wrong with that? Choice, not imposition. I would gladly do it.
Any serious miner will do p2pool because it is way better and safer and makes the network much more robust. Running a p2pool node, yeah thats a different thing and not for anyone. But without doubt, the best gains come from running and mining from your own node.
I would gladly give back a few % to the p2pool network. Its decentralised, impossible to 51% attack, impossible to DDoS, no account hacking, no need for logins and 2FA, no bad actors stealing, and without any central authority whatsoever. The only problem is most hobby miners out there dont understand it fully and tend to flip pools or algo's looking for better gains. And the ramp-up really does suck.
Once you get serious about mining, there is no better experience than p2pool. Payouts just roll without effort, and are statistically better than any central pool. All in all, p2pool is the ultimate solution for ultimate network stability.
)
