Pages:
Author

Topic: Making PoW usefull - page 5. (Read 6578 times)

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1085
Money often costs too much.
January 10, 2015, 03:00:09 AM
#15
Here is a guy who is using the power of bitcoin mining to benefit the planet:

(image of a really bad investment shown)

I'm going to buy some of his bitcoins right now, how about you give him your money too!
He gave his money to ASIC fabrications, well done! Watching the difficulty too, eh?
The roof will drop down soon.

PS: don't buy in, it is loosing value all year long now
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
January 10, 2015, 02:13:56 AM
#14
. . .

unrelated to OP more so related to people mocking bitcoin POW no?

The fellow disregarded the subject of this thread—the perceived wastefulness of PoW—to propagandize for PoW.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
January 10, 2015, 02:05:18 AM
#13
a small miner fish complaining about "not-fairness" is like a small traders complaining it can not buy $10 worth of microsoft stocks like it did decays ago.

. . .
(Red colorization mine.)


Wouldn't it be possible to make use of all those ~250 Phash/s of computer power that we today waste on solving fabricated algorithms? The essence of the Internet is information, so if we are looking for something concrete to be mined, encrypted information seems like a valid contender.

. . .
(Red colorization mine.)

Would you care to try that again?

unrelated to OP more so related to people mocking bitcoin POW no?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
January 10, 2015, 02:00:49 AM
#12
a small miner fish complaining about "not-fairness" is like a small traders complaining it can not buy $10 worth of microsoft stocks like it did decays ago.

. . .
(Red colorization mine.)


Wouldn't it be possible to make use of all those ~250 Phash/s of computer power that we today waste on solving fabricated algorithms? The essence of the Internet is information, so if we are looking for something concrete to be mined, encrypted information seems like a valid contender.

. . .
(Red colorization mine.)

Would you care to try that again?
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
January 10, 2015, 01:33:06 AM
#11
a small miner fish complaining about "not-fairness" is like a small traders complaining it can not buy $10 worth of microsoft stocks like it did decays ago.

Seriously. If you want to be the top fish in POW mining then you have to do what the rest of the top Fishes are doing. invest $$ into buying the equipments. That's the beauty of it. There is nothing stopping you from being one. It's fair game.

Except you do not want to play that game. There was a window of opportunity and it has long past for regular GPU miners to get a shot at Bitcoin POW mining.

Whats next, are you going to complain that you can't buy $0.01 Bitcoins anymore?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
January 10, 2015, 12:58:10 AM
#10
Planting trees would be a useful “Proof-of-Work.”  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
January 09, 2015, 10:50:06 PM
#9
There are already projects underway that attempt to bring together traditional PoW mining with solving scientific problems. The mining doesn't directly solve these problems but instead you get rewarded coins when you contribute processing power to distributed projects like Folding@Home and BOINC. Examples of such coins include Foldingcoin, Curecoin, and Gridcoin.

Then you have coins like Primecoin and Riecoin where the hashing algorithm is directly involved with solving the problem at hand. By mining these coins, you help to solve and identify long strings of prime numbers. The results of these calculations could be useful for future research applications.

On the other hand, if the files that OP are talking about are encrypted using AES-256 with a sufficiently strong password, then I don't think a network of miners no matter how numerous or powerful would be able to crack them. A strong password such as the one below would take 94 septemvigintillion (9.4*10^85) years to crack with a typical desktop PC:

"349UnCzEXsY11!_+%nrb--33s0113191..eEeEE!>>Ezqzbaa#3#"

Even if you had 1 trillion people each with 1 trillion ASICs that were 1 trillion times more powerful, it would still take 9.4*1^49 years which is 6,800 billion billion billion billion times longer than the age of the Universe.

However, most people use shitty passwords so perhaps it might only take a few days. Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
January 09, 2015, 06:06:51 PM
#8
Cracking the wikileaks insurance files is quite possible in a distributed manner, just not with bitcoin itself but a fork which uses the same encryption algo as the NSA's files for verifying "blocks". It would be bit of a bitch to verify the key and credit miners based on the work submitted, since there is only one "block" that needs to be solved.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
January 09, 2015, 11:08:19 AM
#7
ASICs are custom designed to do only one job, SHA256 hashes. Useless for anything else.

Thats a pity for them, because it has no future.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 640
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
January 09, 2015, 11:01:37 AM
#6
This a very interesting approach. It could save PoW.
Currently GRIDCOIN just went public and changed their PoW concept to utilise BOINC.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gridcoin-grc-first-coin-utilizing-boinc-official-thread-324118
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
January 09, 2015, 09:12:04 AM
#5
Hehe! I've now come to understand that brute forcing this form of encryption is practically impossible, even with the power of Bitcoin.  Undecided
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
January 09, 2015, 08:59:00 AM
#4
Here is a guy who is using the power of bitcoin mining to benefit the planet:

http://www.logicoins.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/20140523_164302-e1404154208253.jpg

I'm going to buy some of his bitcoins right now, how about you give him your money too!

Bitcoin 1.0 YAY!!!
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1007
January 09, 2015, 08:37:24 AM
#3
ASICs are custom designed to do only one job, SHA256 hashes. Useless for anything else.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
January 09, 2015, 07:02:30 AM
#1
Wouldn't it be possible to make use of all those ~250 Phash/s of computer power that we today waste on solving fabricated algorithms? The essence of the Internet is information, so if we are looking for something concrete to be mined, encrypted information seems like a valid contender.

What is there to decrypt? The first thing that comes to my mind is Wikileaks. There are X amounts of encrypted documents that still remain hidden from us.

"What's Wikileaks hiding in its 400GB of 'insurance' files?"

Quote
"The triumvirate of files are locked with NSA-approved AES encryption and weigh in at a beefy 3.6GB, 49GB and 349GB respectively.
Without a secret key to decrypt them (or a time machine and a very powerful computer) the files are useless blobs of ones and zeros that allow the safe dispersal of secret information beyond the reach of anyone who might want to interfere with Wikileaks."

Mining is one the biggest flaws of Bitcoin, because it's not used productive in any way. It's a common thing to hear that, "Bitcoin seems like a complete waste of resources".
Pages:
Jump to: