Manager Level = Campaign Successfully?

KuyaBreezy

member

Activity: 504

Merit: 10

ONe Social Network.

Quote from: EuronPower on May 09, 2018, 08:06:02 PM

Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.

As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.

Well, it is true that the rewards are given if the initial goal of the project is achieved but still, we have to try to find the most promising campaigns and I still think that checking the rank of the manager is a good way to find promising projects as it shows they are more reliable.

dumplingsandsushi

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 41

More than the campaign manager themselves, it is the ico/company that is more important.
How legitimate, professional, and serious the company is will determine the success of the campaign.

It works like this, strong companies will not just hire some random campaign manager.
They will take the time to research their options, do a thorough background check of candidates, and go with the one that is best.
If they don't do that and just go with the cheapest, well, that just means they are a badly managed company.
You can see clear signs on if a company is managed well through their social media, their presence at events, and even talking to them directly.

Basically, what I am trying to say is that I have never been in a bounty campaign where they company was great, but the manager was terrible.
However, I and all of us have been in lots of campaigns with terrific managers but terrible companies.
So spend your time vetting the company more.

coinbirds

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 104

High manager level should be some kind of guarantee as they are experienced to select good projects.
In reality bounty managers are paid for their job and for money they will accept almost any project to manage which will not hurt their reputation.

Don Lord

jr. member

Activity: 196

Merit: 1

I often choose only good and trusted managers because I have worked with them and am confident in them. Much depends on the Manager of the company.

Mister.Satan

member

Activity: 163

Merit: 10

Quote from: EuronPower on May 09, 2018, 08:06:02 PM

Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.

As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.

No, I think if you're a Manager of a bounty campaign, you should at least have a good rank or good standing. Just the usual stuff, you can't really trust newbies as Manager because people will avoid it like plague.

enhu

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1018

Ranks doesn't matter. Its best to just look at the project whether there is a chance of it being a scam or not. If you determine the project can be come successful becuase of the people behind it and the project is doable, it probably is going to pay well for your hard work. If you don't trust those ICO campaigns, you better just stick to those BTC paying campaigns which pays weekly.

insidertradingeverywhere

full member

Activity: 468

Merit: 100

The world’s first Play, Learn and Earn

Some of projects don't use managers service, they don't waste money and launch bounty with own manager. Sometimes such bounties are more profitable and sometimes famous managers lead scam campaigns.
It really depends, mate!

fvb

member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 13

Quote from: marcripto on May 10, 2018, 05:16:34 AM

When I choose a bounty campaign I make a very detailed selection. First of all I check the project, read the whitepaper, see if it has a high quality team and advisors, then I also look at who runs the bounty campaign, but for me it is not essential if this user has the highest or lowest rank in the forum

I agree with you. I select companies according to similar criteria. But I trust managers with a higher rank.

dataispower

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 289

It is true in most cases here. Campaigns managed by top-level or higher-level executives will have higher success rates than newbie or Jr. managers.
We can avoid scam ICOs because top managers can distinguish which ICO is good and scam. And they will only accept to be good ICO and bounty

waybesuricata

sr. member

Activity: 1876

Merit: 347

I do not pay much attention to it. But we have to look and look at both the membership and the project. There were a few suggested campaign managers. I usually try to get into their campaigns.

yrrehc16

full member

Activity: 532

Merit: 101

It is not about the manager for the success of the ICO, they are just part of it because of the advertisements.
But, still it is with the team ICO and how they manage and implement their ICO.
Managers are good in any rank as long as there are some ICO team who will trust your work,

Vladique

jr. member

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1

If the manager of a high rank does not mean that the bounty company will be successful. Many popular top-rated managers had a company scam

godfredmanu

member

Activity: 266

Merit: 10

Manager level shouldn't be a yardstick to determine the effectiveness of how a campaign will be. I have been in campaign that is manage by legends that fails to pay or even ended up be scam, why campaigns managed by members or full members were successful and payed well. All depends on the project credibility and the ability to achieve its aim.

juchin

member

Activity: 290

Merit: 10

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: EuronPower on May 09, 2018, 08:06:02 PM

Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.

As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.

The rank of manager bounty is also important with project and participants. It shows the professionalism of this project and manger, it makes participant to rest assured more if managers have high rank

andongdanisi

member

Activity: 379

Merit: 10

Buy, sell and store real cryptocurrencies

Yes, a good manager is very important. Good managers are generally very responsible for the project, and they will not participate in some bad projects, which will affect their reputation.

True Vozer

newbie

Activity: 128

Merit: 0

Manager is important for a successful campaign. The forum rank does not relate because many managers are from the ICO company so they register forum account to run the campaign.

ArIMy11

full member

Activity: 519

Merit: 101

Quote from: EuronPower on May 09, 2018, 08:06:02 PM

Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.

As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.

The success of a campaign do not depend on the level of the manager. I already joined a campaign whose manager is a junior member and yes the project do succeded and the manager also distribute the right amount of tokens.
On the other side, I also join a campaign managed by a well-known manager. But the campaign did not reach the soft cap or the whole campaign is just a scam. So it is not always about the manager.

BigOne

member

Activity: 152

Merit: 10

This is not necessarily. As far as I know, there are some high-ranking bounty managers. They accept any project, and many projects are scam. This is very common, so rank is not an absolute factor. There are some ranks that are not high manager is also very responsible.

AleksBBB

jr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 1

Manager doesn't reflect the success rate of the project. But in many case bounty might just be managed by the person from ICO team. Manager can not affect the distribution of rewards tokens and on projects contributions success.

Urtaev

member

Activity: 285

Merit: 10

🤖UBEX.COM 🤖

Most likely, the correlation between the manager and the quality of the campaign actually exists. This has been repeatedly verified.

Topic: Manager Level = Campaign Successfully? (Read 900 times)