Topic: Manager Level = Campaign Successfully? - page 2. (Read 901 times)
Not always a good Manager is a guarantee of project success. Yes, the chances of course increase that the project will be successful - as the Manager also earns on this, so it is absolutely not profitable to choose a company of scammers. But beginners can lead a very promising project
Yes, I believe that the manager's rating really influences the success and prospects of a particular project. But personally, I'm focused on working with a manager who already paid me before in other bounty programs.
Yes, it depends on the rating and reputation of the manager himself. After all, with the participation in the project of a manager with a good rating, the chances for the development of the project and ICO are significantly increased.
Yes, I believe that the prospects of the project depend to a large extent on the rating and success of a particular manager. Therefore, this criterion must be taken into account when choosing.
As for me, I choose the manager who has already paid me for the past generosity that he managed, and then I will stick with it. Regardless of how good or weak the project will be, at least I know what I'm paid at the end of the campaign.
I don't think the rank of the client who made the ANN string or the rank of the abundance supervisor matters here. Its the group behind an undertaking and whether the task should conceivably be possible. while we can consider the rank, it probably won't be the premise of whether the battle members will be paid. Its the ICO advanced effectively and got reserves from financial specialists.
Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.
As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
I quite agree with you on this, the success or failure of an ico does not lie in the hands of the manager but mostly depend on the team of the ico as well as what the project has to offer. As regards the second question, I do not have a problem with who is posting the bounty information, all I care about is how successful it will be because that is where my reward lies and besides, if he of she is not competent enough, he will not be assigned by the team to manage the bounty campaign. As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
I will put more trust and attention in the manager who has brought many successful projects before. I think the manager's credibility and ability to manage a project is more important than the manager account rank.
Yes you are right, those manager with good reputation are the one's who are going to have successful projects because most of the people will prefer to promote their bounty.
Yeah, the every Important of choosing a good bounty manager Is that has a lot experience of different campaigns and all of this were successive through his managing. And that Is the factor to choose a reliable manager which make Inspire to join his campaign.
I will put more trust and attention in the manager who has brought many successful projects before. I think the manager's credibility and ability to manage a project is more important than the manager account rank.
Yes you are right, those manager with good reputation are the one's who are going to have successful projects because most of the people will prefer to promote their bounty.
I will put more trust and attention in the manager who has brought many successful projects before. I think the manager's credibility and ability to manage a project is more important than the manager account rank.
It might be true that a higher ranked member has more experience in crypto but in some cases do not mean the success of the ICO manages while also a Jr member can perform better than him.
Don't judge the success of any ico by the rank of the manager. Don't be surprised that even a manager with lower rank might perform better than the one with legendary rank.
The famous managers to get more trust. The experienced users it's often the companies which to checking and doing promotion ICO.
I try to search for high rank users in the forum to choose the bounty campaigns I work with, but I was thinking that it could be better to choose directly a group of telegram dedicate to the management of bounty campaigns, it came to my mind that scammers could also have high ranked accounts in the forum. 
The manager's experience is certainly the main thing, but the success of the campaign depends only on the future of the project. Our income depends on many factors, and the manager does not have much to do with this. I am inspired by inspiration when, despite his very good funding, the manager looking at a weak project writes on the Forum's main page about the insolvency of the project and that he is not responsible for it. I am putting such a manager in my asset and looking for his future projects.
in my opinion, it does not depend on how high the manager's bounty rank, for example, a well-known bounty manager such as needmoney, which lately has a bounty managed by needmoney, often bounty scams, even though the needmoney rank is a legend, it can be concluded that success or failure a bounty campaign does not depend on the rank of manager bounty.
Higher Rank is more trusted than lower rank. It is already obvious that high Rank member are more capable and experience in terms of running Campaign. It is more easier for the low rank member to abandon the project than higher Rank because having a high rank takes time and experience before you reach that level.
Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.
As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
It should not be decided on their level on the forum. A Person with Newbie status could have years of experience in managing online marketing .
This is not given. Though a bounty manager's rank would entail a greater possibility for success of an ICO. A manager with a good ICO portfolio gives credibility to a project's campaign giving bounty participants the better chance of earning rewards. Choose wisely folks!
I don't think so, because there are new managers (member ranking) who can make the campaign a success, so in my opinion the manager level doesn't affect everything.
Jump to: