Manchester United as a historical club. Who’s achievement is other football club dreams. Has in the past years lost its glory after Alex Ferguson stepped down as the manager. He has been succeeded by many managers after he retired and non has been able to continue in his legacy not to talk of doing greater things nor achieving something greater.
-The question is what could be the reason to It’s down fall?
Lot of people said Man U are facing karma, as a result of match fixing and bribery. Could this be true?
United hasn’t been the same after Ferguson left the club.
-Could it be mismanagement or the owners aren’t putting out more effort to see the glory going forward?
-Could it be they hasn’t found the right manager to deliver the job.
-Could it be the players at some point don’t bother about the the future of the club as a result of the high wages they received.
Something needs to be done to restore Man U back to its glory
Manchester United's decline after Sir Alex's retirement Ferguson is complex and difficult to attribute to one factor. Rumors about football organizing or financing often play a role in this. Because these seem more like speculation. The crux of the club's struggles appears to stem from poor leadership. football changes And perhaps there is an identity crisis behind Ferris.
With the departure of Ferguson United thus lost the style of leadership that had been their backbone for more than two decades. Ferguson's ability to manage players, adjust strategies and maintain a winning spirit is unmatched. And could any of his successors replicate that level of success? Whether it be David Moyes, Louis van Gaal, Jose Mourinho or even Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, no one has been able to create a vision or a long-term deal.
Poor governance could also be part of it. Especially as far as the club running from top to bottom. There are criticisms of ownership by the Glazer family. Many fans do feel more about the business side of the club rather than sporting glory. The maverick approach in the signings also worked. With costly signings not always attached to the club's philosophy or strategy.
High wages and attitude of players may be one factor too. Manchester financial muscle United means they are pulling in the superstars. At times, though, it seems that players lack the hunger or tenacity to bring the club back to where it was. After all, the focus of players has now changed from inheritance to money. It is perhaps one of the biggest factors affecting the performance and team integration of a side.
It would be good to have the right leader but they also need time, support to build up a cohesive team. Ferguson was given time to groom his team but in modern football, it is impatient with a high expectation of instant results.
All three could be possible obviously but that doesn't mean one of them has to be true, maybe they are all true? We already saw Glazers were bad, ineos seems like they are not doing a great job so far neither but maybe they will do better later on.
We need to realize sometimes there are bigger problems though, sure it's a mismanaged team but also ETH is a terrible manager as well, he doesn't make changes that will fix the team and his transfer requests makes no sense, this team doesn't even have a proper left back and he bought another Dutch offensive player. Also players may not be caring anymore as well, because they know ETH will leave if they do badly, and they obviously do not want a manager who throws them under the bus when the team does badly, it is not a good look for the players and their future when manager bashes them on conference speeches so they want him gone, so they play badly, or basically not caring. So they will recover when ETH leaves.
That is right many things can happen; chances are that Manchester United's issue is all of three above poor management bad manager And possibly lack of motivation due to position of the player The Glazer family has been held in a poor light by critics for many years. And focusing more on the business end rather than the sporting end does seem to impact the club even if it is going to be taken over by Ineos. As it turns out, though, it's still too early to say whether they will turn things around. Change of ownership doesn't automatically mean overnight restoration of success to most clubs. As we have seen in other groups as well.
When it comes to Erik ten Hag (ETH), I agree that some of his decisions Especially regarding team transfers and strategies. Still not quite right for the club. Signing players who cannot immediately meet the team's needs, such as a good left back. It creates an unbalanced team. Leave a gap that your opponent can exploit. But the important thing to remember is that Changes in management can destroy the long-term vision. And United have had some since Ferguson left.
The attitude of the players is another important factor, as we mentioned earlier. When the group became less committed and they felt that the manager's comments at the press conference were being undermined. It is normal for their motivation to decrease. Players need to feel supported by their manager. It was not publicly condemned. But if lack of commitment is the only goal in forcing ETH out, then that is cause for concern. Because it indicates a lack of efficiency. No matter what the leader is The group and its legacy must come first.
