Well when I seen the posts that where made by Troleybüs because he contacted me in PM saying he didn't get paid on posts and I gave reasons to as why didn't get paid as the posts that he or she made where very short posts. If their was some agreement in place for his posts to be paid on then maybe this should of been horned and even if agreements where made then proof of this should be spoke about in pm or if not delt with to then go public with proof of the post that Troleybüs was claiming should be paid on. From me as a member looking at his post they where very very short and would not qualify as quality in length post.
Why did he contact you? And why/how would you give him an answer? Are you a representative of Marcotheminer and/or bit-x?
If a post is made and only maybe 10 words or so or even less then it would not be paid in most signature campaigns and most managers of them would agree with what am saying. am not disagreeing on the posts that where indeed made by Troleybüs but theirs rules that each one has and me being in a lot of the signature campaigns over the last year or so he or she would of not been paid due to how short responses are in the post that Troleybüs had made. Again tho if Troleybüs marc had some arrangement and agreement in place to be paid then this should of at least been horned.
There is no rule regarding the min length that posts need to be in order to qualify for it to be counted. The only spam related rules that are in place are that regarding posts in specific sections, there are no rules regarding the min length that posts need to be.
Regardless, none of this matters, as the allegation of Marcotheminer evading his ban, if true is a violation of forum rules and is something that he shouldn't have done. He apparently had been banned previously for similar reasons in the past.
I am not a representative of Marcotheminer nor of bit-x. I am just a member of their signature campaign. I just know from experience in being in them on here and other forums alike. I had seen some of the posts that Troleybüs said about not been paid and commented on one of his responses and then he sent me a pm about it and I explained like above in more details of why wouldn't get paid out on them. I have done work like this before and also done work on other forums for paid to post forums based on level of membership that, was decided to just been paid for any old post but their was limits in place like on the signature campaigns that admins of them have in place. So I am just speaking out of experience on what will more likely to be accepted as a paid post and not. Most rules on paid to post forums or signature ones want posts above 10 to 15 words. Places where I had worked on posts where set as a min of 20 words for it being counted as a paid post to reduce quantity of posts being made and having quality posts that would be worth while and not short or spamish posts. Campaigns on here only say no spam posts or off topic.
Posts like " Hello to you too, how are you doing?" or stuff like" Yeah ok I agree top coin count me in" Both responses are short and can easily be represented as post building, to increase your post count and then expect to be paid for it. I had to deal with over 5k to 10k members on a weekly basics going though thousands of posts and checking them. Indeed they might be on topic to what that member has posted. When it comes down to quality of posting it needs to be something that is going to be quality, useful, helpful, or a good topic that will have future posts on it from other members that will indeed gain the interest of the public viewing and also current members.
Maybe an idea for signature campaign managers should look into is actually having a min word limit on posts saying min words per response 10 to 15 etc or if under this posts will be future inspected to check to see if qualify as a quality post or not. That way it would sort a lot of problems out for many campaign managers that are running current ones. I have only seen a few people being removed from signature campaigns and most them where for posts being too short, spam, off topic, arguments, scammer, getting banned, removing signature part way though and then making some excuses up that wasn't them.
Still I do not know the full story of what happened with Troleybüs so I can not say who is wrong who is right if Troleybüs had indeed had some agreement or something in place than that should at least be respected .
Edited.
Well found some thread created seems that trole had some sort of transaction that was not forfilled and marc didnt payout for outstanding pay on item.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/troleybuseal-f-skillzpandacoin-970157if that account is surely control by Marco, then marco is dishonest and doesnt honor the rules made by himself
Rules:
- This signature is the only thing permitted in the designated space and must be worn all times.
- All users who receive valid negative trust and/or are banned for spam or likewise during the course of the campaign will be denied payment.
- In case of an activity change, you will be paid at your new membership level after your payout.
- Post consistently.
- One bitcointalk account per user.
Bit-x surely choose the wrong person to manage this campaign
Well if that was true then people should be reporting back to them to put someone else in charge. However I been with it from almost the start and found to have never had any problems but seen a fair few problems that did get resolved but with any campaign theirs always going to be some sort of problems and decisions made that are not going to be liked.
