Author

Topic: margin terminal - over 25 spot and futures exchanges! Bots and more - page 199. (Read 268837 times)

newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
ANyone care to share if they are using the BOT on auto or are they manually trading?

I have been trading manually (through leo) for the most part the last three weeks because of how crazy the markets have been. I have had the margin maker bot running here or there using about 10% of my total balance for generating faster, small profits which I don't have time to do. I am going to be testing it over larger time periods and much bigger percentages for a couple weeks to see how it does.

The trading interface alone makes this app worth it.
hero member
Activity: 838
Merit: 500
ANyone care to share if they are using the BOT on auto or are they manually trading?
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 254
It seems that everything has been running smoothly for the last couple of days.
Let's keep making transactions!
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1008
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.

It did this error for me on Bittrex a number of times, up to the point that I couldn't open the Bittrex market at all.  It was clearly a weird API response from Bittrex (I could see in the logs that it wasn't JSON at all).

So it seems to me that some improvement of error handling would be required here.  Normally, leonArdo should be able to continue past the unintelligible API response, and not simply crash wioth that C++ Library error instead.

We agree. Seg fault crashes should not happen.

If you can re-produce one - we'd love to hear how you can do it.

If you can produce a crash report please send it on.

Any specific information helps us to improve leonArdo. This is complex stuff, but we are working hard on it.

Thanks for all your support guys!


I am under the impression that I wrote it a few times already:  Make orders, then cancel before the order is placed / confirmed on the exchange, or move an existing order then cancel it before it has finished to replace it.  That's a near-guaranteed crash, at least in my experience.

If you want to test and reproduce that, just place many bots (with 0.001 BTC value, or something like twice the minimal value), and have fun moving them around in an aggressive way, like if you want to push leonArdo to the limit.  You'll see it crash quite easily, I believe.

Not a day passes by without leonArdo crashing.

As for a "crash report", would any of the logs be helpful for you?  I've offered by email to send you that a few times, but I didn't get a clear reply on it.

Also, I believe it would be important that you setup PGP key, so that we can communicate securely with you by email.


I am not only talking to you TransAtlantic! There are others on the thread here.

The issue you described has been noted and is a help to us.

The leonArdo logs won't help for a seg fault crash.

Best wishes,
Jonathan


full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.

It did this error for me on Bittrex a number of times, up to the point that I couldn't open the Bittrex market at all.  It was clearly a weird API response from Bittrex (I could see in the logs that it wasn't JSON at all).

So it seems to me that some improvement of error handling would be required here.  Normally, leonArdo should be able to continue past the unintelligible API response, and not simply crash wioth that C++ Library error instead.

We agree. Seg fault crashes should not happen.

If you can re-produce one - we'd love to hear how you can do it.

If you can produce a crash report please send it on.

Any specific information helps us to improve leonArdo. This is complex stuff, but we are working hard on it.

Thanks for all your support guys!


I am under the impression that I wrote it a few times already:  Make orders, then cancel before the order is placed / confirmed on the exchange, or move an existing order then cancel it before it has finished to replace it.  That's a near-guaranteed crash, at least in my experience.

If you want to test and reproduce that, just place many bots (with 0.001 BTC value, or something like twice the minimal value), and have fun moving them around in an aggressive way, like if you want to push leonArdo to the limit.  You'll see it crash quite easily, I believe.

Not a day passes by without leonArdo crashing.

As for a "crash report", would any of the logs be helpful for you?  I've offered by email to send you that a few times, but I didn't get a clear reply on it.

Also, I believe it would be important that you setup PGP keys, so that we can communicate securely with you by email.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1008
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.

It did this error for me on Bittrex a number of times, up to the point that I couldn't open the Bittrex market at all.  It was clearly a weird API response from Bittrex (I could see in the logs that it wasn't JSON at all).

So it seems to me that some improvement of error handling would be required here.  Normally, leonArdo should be able to continue past the unintelligible API response, and not simply crash wioth that C++ Library error instead.

We agree. Seg fault crashes should not happen.

If you can re-produce one - we'd love to hear how you can do it.

If you can produce a crash report please send it on.

Any specific information helps us to improve leonArdo. This is complex stuff, but we are working hard on it.

Thanks for all your support guys!
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.

It did this error for me on Bittrex a number of times, up to the point that I couldn't open the Bittrex market at all.  It was clearly a weird API response from Bittrex (I could see in the logs that it wasn't JSON at all).

So it seems to me that some improvement of error handling would be required here.  Normally, leonArdo should be able to continue past the unintelligible API response, and not simply crash wioth that C++ Library error instead.
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.

Thanks for your swift reply.
So, everything is to be addressed on Polo...

No, there is something wrong with the bot - it's not handling something correctly. Polo is just exacerbating it. They know about a memory leak. That may or may not be the cause of this problem. But they are working on it.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 254
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.

Thanks for your swift reply.
So, everything is to be addressed on Polo...
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?

It has nothing to do with number of bots.

I do see it more often when Polo is fucking up, though. I think the bot isn't handling something properly when Polo is wonky. I don't know if it messes up on other exchanges.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 254
Overall, the thing which upset me the most is that the software crashes. C++ library.

Would it be because I am running so many bots? Is there a limit to the maximum number to run simultaneously?
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 254
I'm running the bot on Poloniex. Why the bot stops and does not run 24/7?
My internet connection is pretty stable.

Suggestion:
when the bot runs in Ping Pong, assuming it starts with a buy. Once it makes a successful buy and a successful sell, would it be possible to make it do a sell (assuming there is enough coins in the balance) and keep it running this way? In other words: buy --> sell --> sell --> buy --> buy ....
Sorry if I am not really clear

It's Poloniex. They have had problems for a week now.

Such bullshit!!!

 Undecided



Actually, it's not bullshit. Poloniex have been under extreme pressure for the past couple of weeks now. At times it takes minutes for an order to get placed and at a certain point if the API stops communication leonArdo's bots have to stop.

As for your question. It's currently not possible, but as  akeetlebeetle said, you can set up multiple bots on a single currency pair.

I hope that helps.

Best wishes,
Jonathan




Thanks for the suggestion.
For the Poloniex business, they need to solve their issues as their business is growing!

 Kiss
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1008
I'm running the bot on Poloniex. Why the bot stops and does not run 24/7?
My internet connection is pretty stable.

Suggestion:
when the bot runs in Ping Pong, assuming it starts with a buy. Once it makes a successful buy and a successful sell, would it be possible to make it do a sell (assuming there is enough coins in the balance) and keep it running this way? In other words: buy --> sell --> sell --> buy --> buy ....
Sorry if I am not really clear

It's Poloniex. They have had problems for a week now.

Such bullshit!!!

 Undecided

Actually, it's not bullshit. Poloniex have been under extreme pressure for the past couple of weeks now. At times it takes minutes for an order to get placed and at a certain point if the API stops communicating, leonArdo's bots have to stop.

As for your question. It's currently not possible, but as akeetlebeetle said, you can set up multiple bots on a single currency pair.

I hope that helps.

Best wishes,
Jonathan


full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
I'm running the bot on Poloniex. Why the bot stops and does not run 24/7?
My internet connection is pretty stable.

Suggestion:
when the bot runs in Ping Pong, assuming it starts with a buy. Once it makes a successful buy and a successful sell, would it be possible to make it do a sell (assuming there is enough coins in the balance) and keep it running this way? In other words: buy --> sell --> sell --> buy --> buy ....
Sorry if I am not really clear

No, but you could set up opposite ping-pongs.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 254
I'm running the bot on Poloniex. Why the bot stops and does not run 24/7?
My internet connection is pretty stable.

Suggestion:
when the bot runs in Ping Pong, assuming it starts with a buy. Once it makes a successful buy and a successful sell, would it be possible to make it do a sell (assuming there is enough coins in the balance) and keep it running this way? In other words: buy --> sell --> sell --> buy --> buy ....
Sorry if I am not really clear

It's Poloniex. They have had problems for a week now.

Such bullshit!!!

 Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
I'm running the bot on Poloniex. Why the bot stops and does not run 24/7?
My internet connection is pretty stable.

Suggestion:
when the bot runs in Ping Pong, assuming it starts with a buy. Once it makes a successful buy and a successful sell, would it be possible to make it do a sell (assuming there is enough coins in the balance) and keep it running this way? In other words: buy --> sell --> sell --> buy --> buy ....
Sorry if I am not really clear

It's Poloniex. They have had problems for a week now.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 254
I'm running the bot on Poloniex. Why the bot stops and does not run 24/7?
My internet connection is pretty stable.

Suggestion:
when the bot runs in Ping Pong, assuming it starts with a buy. Once it makes a successful buy and a successful sell, would it be possible to make it do a sell (assuming there is enough coins in the balance) and keep it running this way? In other words: buy --> sell --> sell --> buy --> buy ....
Sorry if I am not really clear
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1008

Bitstamp is adding Litecoin trading (LTC/BTC, LTC/EUR, LTC/USD) in early June.
(source:  https://www.bitstamp.net/article/bitstamp-announces-phase-ii-its-development/  )
and Ethereum "will be made available shortly after".

Any chance that the Bitstamp market on leonArdo be updated to support that?  (and including Ripple too, which is already available on Bitstamp?)

Margin trading at Bitstamp is on the way, too.

Yes! It's on our to-do list!

Thanks for the heads up!

Best wishes,
Jonathan

full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100

Bitstamp is adding Litecoin trading (LTC/BTC, LTC/EUR, LTC/USD) in early June.
(source:  https://www.bitstamp.net/article/bitstamp-announces-phase-ii-its-development/  )
and Ethereum "will be made available shortly after".

Any chance that the Bitstamp market on leonArdo be updated to support that?  (and including Ripple too, which is already available on Bitstamp?)

Margin trading at Bitstamp is on the way, too.
Jump to: