Martin Armstrong Discussion - page 46.

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

No Panic Cycle week. Armstrong's call was (another) failure. According to the site, a Panic Cycle is defined as an outside reversal to penetrate the previous session high or low. This week was an inside session; the Dow did not at any point exceed last week's high or low.

Not only that (the S&P was down a lousy 1% on the week):

Quote from: DanB1 on January 09, 2020, 06:46:45 AM

What he basically is saying now is: a high around Saturday January 18 (week before or after)= turning down 20%+ into Q1 2021. Only if US share markets make a low on the ECM we would rally in 2020 once we take out 2019 high.
For now, taking out 28.971,94 on a weekly basis could mean going toward 30k.

Again a failure of Armstrong's "if that happens, then this is going to happen". The Dow was down this week and not tested the 30k despite electing the 28.971,94 number the week before that.

dibley8899

jr. member

Activity: 80

Merit: 1

Quote from: nstrdms on January 24, 2020, 10:12:33 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJ_BTOLxxo

I posted a comment there under scammersglobal but its only showing up when i login...hmmmmmm

AnonymousCoder

member

Activity: 580

Merit: 17

Quote from: nstrdms on January 24, 2020, 10:12:33 PM

The Dow's next major test is the 40,000 level: Martin Armstrong

Isn't it amazing how the entire interview of our charlatan by the MSM is completely fact free? What a complete waste of time! Except that here we are once again given the opportunity to check everything (doing the work that the fake news morons fail to do). So what is this? Propaganda? Gossip?

Let us check some facts.

MA: AE Global Solutions "Institutional Advisor"? "We have far more institutions than anybody"?

Check: When he acted as a financial advisor he went to jail for it. See Martin Armstrong. Look at AE Global Inc.

Defunct. No references. No clients. Only his cult following of retail investors. He is NOT offering ANY financial advice at all if you read the fine print on all of his sites.

MA: "So we have got offices from China, South-east Asia, Abu Dabi, Europe and America."

Check: See Review on WEC - World Economic Conferences and His Fake Office

MA: Socrates "the only truth for Artificial Intelligence computer system"?

Check: See Lies about Super-computer

MA: "Socrates is basically the computer system I, that's what I named it, it analyzing everything in the world - it goes from a capital flow perspective ..."

Check: See

The Global Correlation Model

MA: "Yeah, I mean, ah, if we end up seeing this week, the week after that turning point close lower than Friday 17 then yes, we get a short term correction."

Check: See A Self-fulfilling Financial Forecast

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog

nstrdms

jr. member

Activity: 35

Merit: 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wJ_BTOLxxo

Traxo

hero member

Activity: 568

Merit: 703

Quote from: Lunarexpress on January 24, 2020, 10:54:57 AM

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

https://i.imgur.com/Zp6otO2.png

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Hey ummm, SMIII? Thanks for your input.

Here is how "circle jerking" works:
1) Provide clear quote of MA predicting a certain event and the timing of the said event if MA provided it (I guess you provided quote of him predicting... some thing that would happen around 2019).
2) Point out which event happened and you think MA predicted.

So with regards to 2), can you point out what exactly do you think he predicted? Which current (we are around that time-frame I guess) event? Then we will refer back to the MA quote from 1) and see if MA nailed it.
I don't see anything irrational here, users here have done the same thing when refuting MAs predictions.

I guess the "circle jerkers" can argue that MA hasn't really predicted anything... YET, tho the date and current events might be compelling.
Oh, "circle jerkers" could also argue that MA scattershot multiple dates for same prediction in other blogs/reports. Who knows. But ok I guess let's not go into that for now.

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

Quote from: s29 on January 23, 2020, 11:49:49 AM

Quote from: Traxo on January 23, 2020, 02:45:37 AM

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/opinion/the-strange-way-some-people-think
COMMENT #1: HILARIOUS!! A simple FOOL wanting to shoot the messenger.
“A closed mind gathers NO facts.”

Also reminds me of this very weird "email" a few months ago:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/we-all-have-a-little-bubbles/

Quote

Posted Sep 23, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

Dude, you are so right on. When anybody criticizes you, just say “FTB” (Forget That Bitch) or FTSB (Forget Those Stoopid Bitches) or FTBS (Forget That Bull Shit) or just say all of it.

THANK YOU!!!

God Bless You My Great Brother!!!

They talk like they just escaped from solitary. Maybe some old friends of Armstrong.

Quote from: Lunarexpress on January 24, 2020, 10:54:57 AM

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Goodbye

Btw, same writer?

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

Quote from: Lunarexpress on January 24, 2020, 10:54:57 AM

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Goodbye

Oh My God, this new user is totally legit.

It's truly an AMAZING prediction from Armstrong, since viruses and epidemics only occur once in a lifetime!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics#21st_century

Quote

Death toll (estimate)    Location    Date    Article    Disease    Ref.

203,000    worldwide    2009    2009 flu pandemic    Influenza    [105][106]
9,985 (May 2017)    Hispaniola    2010–present    Haiti cholera outbreak    Cholera    [107][108]
> 4,500 (February 2014)    Democratic Republic of the Congo    2011–present       Measles    [109][110]
170    Vietnam    2011–present       Hand, foot and mouth disease    [111][112]
> 350    Pakistan    2011–present    2011 dengue outbreak in Pakistan    Dengue fever
847 (as of 10 January 2013)    Darfur Sudan    2012    2012 yellow fever outbreak in Darfur, Sudan    Yellow fever    [113]
449 (as of 11 June 2015)    Worldwide    2012–present    2012 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreak    Middle East respiratory syndrome    [114]
>> 11,300    West Africa    2013–2016    Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa    Ebola virus disease
Ebola virus virion
   [115][116]
183    Americas    2013–2015    2013–14 chikungunya outbreak    Chikungunya    [117]
40    Madagascar    2014–present    2014 Madagascar plague outbreak    Bubonic plague    [118]
36    India    2014–present    2014 Odisha jaundice outbreak    Primarily Hepatitis E, but also Hepatitis A    [119]
2,035    India    2015–present    2015 Indian swine flu outbreak    Influenza A virus subtype H1N1    [120][121][122]
   worldwide    2015–present    2015–16 Zika virus epidemic    Zika virus
Hundreds (as of 1 April 2016)    Africa    2016    2016 yellow fever outbreak in Angola    Yellow fever    [123]
1,614 (as of 4 July 2017)    Yemen    2016–present    2016–17 Yemen cholera outbreak    Cholera
64 (as of 16 August 2017)    India    2017–present    2017 Gorakhpur Japanese encephalitis outbreak    Japanese encephalitis
17 (as of June 2018)    India    2018–present    2018 Nipah virus outbreak    Nipah virus infection
2,242 (as of 20 January 2020)    Democratic Republic of the Congo & Uganda    August 2018–present    2018-19 Kivu Ebola epidemic    Ebola virus disease    [124][125]
1    Mozambique    March 2019–present       Cholera    [126]
"nearly" 5,000 (by November 2019)    Democratic Republic of the Congo    2019–present    2019 measles outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo    Measles    [127]
≥26    Worldwide    2020–present    2019-20 China pneumonia outbreak    Novel coronavirus    [128]

Can you really earn money with predicting an epidemic to the year? Only if you're Armstrong I guess Shocked

trulycoined

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 8

Quote from: Lunarexpress on January 24, 2020, 10:54:57 AM

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Goodbye

Confirming once again that MA was wrong and his theory totally bogus?

No plague or pandemic has struck and currently we do not know what will happen with the coronavirus. Even if there is a pandemic this year, it still flies in the face of his ECM claim that it predicts things "to the day". Plus, there are already active programmes by real scientists to predict the next pandemic, astutely named PREDICT: https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/program/predict

To your point, see this MA blog post from 2 Oct 2014, the same year that report was published:

"The plague cycle appears to be reaching an important high in 2019."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/will-the-demise-be-plague-or-economics/

There was no plague and it did not reach any "high". Moreover, that was based on MA's invented "big bang" hoax of 2015.75, where everything was supposed to "turn down" into 2020.05.

All of it the invention of a mind that I feel is turning increasingly senile if his recent blog posts are anything to go by.

MA is now totally discredited. The research, evidence and content on this board over the past 8 months are damning and leaves little to counter unless, as an avid follower, you are in a state of denial that your cult-like leader has been deceiving you all this time.

Caveat emptor.

dibley8899

jr. member

Activity: 80

Merit: 1

Quote from: Lunarexpress on January 24, 2020, 10:54:57 AM

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Goodbye

Marty's upset.....he's just registered as a new user. OR suddenly 50 deaths has become the black death lol.

Anyway I imagined he's more peeved at paying for the dumb report if he is real.

So many indices globally made new highs this week but it has failed Marty's attention on the website choosing to waffle about nonsense while his ECM takes a suppository event.

SOC1

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Quote from: Lunarexpress on January 24, 2020, 10:54:57 AM

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

https://i.imgur.com/Zp6otO2.png

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Goodbye

@Lunareexpress......I fail to see your point here?

The Black Death killed 25m people.....are you trying to insinuate that the Coronavirus (which by the way kills a few hundred people every year) is somehow a Socrates prediction? The death toll is less than 30 people & nothing has happened yet i.e. it is statistically irrelevant.

Yes things could change, yes there could be a pandemic outbreak & yes anything is possible but this is nonsense. Come back when you have some facts to share.

Its no wonder MA is able to manipulate the masses with comments like that....lol

Lunarexpress

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!)

https://i.imgur.com/Zp6otO2.png

ECM 2020.05...

Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong.

Goodbye

blinder007

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 1

MA and Socrates is the biggest shitshow I ever have come across in the advisory business.

Over the years I have saved a lot of his stuff including tons of data from Market Watch on my computer.
Already the whole setup of Market Watch is made to deceive you. eg on every level the Trend can change until the timeframe is finished.
Example: It can show on the yearly level until Dec 30 of the year "Bear Market" and change after the last trading day of the year is finished to "Bull Market" or something else.
So for the actual timeframe there is NO predictive and useful value. And then I wen't back to see what the results were in the next timeframe. Absolutely random. Valueless.

But absolutely not acceptable was the following. I detected, that several timeframes later the made predictions for a certain timeframe were changed and altered on a future date. And this is fraud.

MA should maybe on his next ShitShow in Europe book some bodyguards instead of an Asian hooker. Might be some of his groupies might not be that pleased anymore with him.

And if there is again some stupid idiot asking here if anybody knows what the other MA idiot is "predicting/spinning/telling fairy tales" then I can promiss them: MA and Socrates predicts always for any market in every timeframe 3 things: it can go up, it can down, it stays the same. So he is always 100 % right. That is his game.

By the way: T H E R E is N O H O L Y G R A I L - (period).

And some firms who developed their Bonanza Trading Apps (as mentioned here before) are not selling it to the public for 14.99 or 99.99. They really do trade and make a killing. (MA pissed away and lost his investors funds and wen't to jail for that).

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

Quote from: Traxo on January 23, 2020, 02:45:37 AM

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/opinion/the-strange-way-some-people-think
COMMENT #1: HILARIOUS!! A simple FOOL wanting to shoot the messenger.
“A closed mind gathers NO facts.”

Also reminds me of this very weird "email" a few months ago:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/we-all-have-a-little-bubbles/

Quote

Posted Sep 23, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

Dude, you are so right on. When anybody criticizes you, just say “FTB” (Forget That Bitch) or FTSB (Forget Those Stoopid Bitches) or FTBS (Forget That Bull Shit) or just say all of it.

THANK YOU!!!

God Bless You My Great Brother!!!

They talk like they just escaped from solitary. Maybe some old friends of Armstrong.

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

Quote from: DanB1 on January 23, 2020, 07:08:01 AM

Yes, I have access. I just wanted to know what he would say now around this "important" ECM date.
And I always try to look at it with an open mind. No matter if he was wrong in the past on reversals, could he be right on an ECM turning?
If he would have claimed a big high last Friday in the DOW untill Q1/Q2 2021, and if that happens, then that would be a big call as we have been rallying non stop for years.
But now what he says is basically that if we go down - we go down, and if we go up - we go up.

So the reversals and array's are not working (as showed on this blog) and now also his ECM turning can go both ways.

DanB1

jr. member

Activity: 100

Merit: 1

Quote from: s29 on January 23, 2020, 06:44:04 AM

Quote from: nstrdms on January 23, 2020, 03:54:25 AM

Quote from: DanB1 on January 23, 2020, 03:01:14 AM

MA now says we could make new highs and rally further into 2022 as soon as the DOW takes out last Friday's high.
Always waiting on the sidelines for the next move. If we go up further he could just say that the trust in banks has become so low that people are forced into the stock market.

Source?

He has access to the Private Blog for a while.

But oh, first he says the shit is going down into the ECM 2020 "business cycle low", then Armstrong claims it will do the opposite after the ECM 2020 turning point ("correcting 20% into Q1 2021"), then calls the high this week, and now suddenly further upside into 2022 if the high on the Dow is taking out this week? This guy is more confusing than the whole Trade War we had. He's even more reactive than a first time trader. Of course, Marty will claim he was right by playing both sides every time he feels like. Depends on which schizophrenic personality is in control at that time I guess...

Yes, I have access. I just wanted to know what he would say now around this "important" ECM date.
And I always try to look at it with an open mind. No matter if he was wrong in the past on reversals, could he be right on an ECM turning?
If he would have claimed a big high last Friday in the DOW untill Q1/Q2 2021, and if that happens, then that would be a big call as we have been rallying non stop for years.
But now what he says is basically that if we go down - we go down, and if we go up - we go up.

So the reversals and array's are not working (as showed on this blog) and now also his ECM turning can go both ways.

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

Quote from: nstrdms on January 23, 2020, 03:54:25 AM

Quote from: DanB1 on January 23, 2020, 03:01:14 AM

MA now says we could make new highs and rally further into 2022 as soon as the DOW takes out last Friday's high.
Always waiting on the sidelines for the next move. If we go up further he could just say that the trust in banks has become so low that people are forced into the stock market.

Source?

He has access to the Private Blog for a while.

But oh, first he says the shit is going down into the ECM 2020 "business cycle low", then Armstrong claims it will do the opposite after the ECM 2020 turning point ("correcting 20% into Q1 2021"), then calls the high this week, and now suddenly further upside into 2022 if the high on the Dow is taking out this week? This guy is more confusing than the whole Trade War we had. He's even more reactive than a first time trader. Of course, Marty will claim he was right by playing both sides every time he feels like. Depends on which schizophrenic personality is in control at that time I guess...

s29

jr. member

Activity: 184

Merit: 8

Quote from: Traxo on January 23, 2020, 02:45:37 AM

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/opinion/the-strange-way-some-people-think

COMMENT #1: HILARIOUS!! A simple FOOL wanting to shoot the messenger.
“A closed mind gathers NO facts.”

Marty, we gathered facts exposing your deception. It's all documented, and quoted.

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/opinion/the-strange-way-some-people-think

REPLY: No worries. I find these people just a joke myself. I refrain from publishing them because sometimes they are just so off the wall it is hilarious. They claim I make up the questions because I publish ones that are at least valid. So once in a while I will post some of these crazy ones just to show how nuts they can be.

It's actually because questions have been generic.
How about you actually quote our posts and link to them?
Tell us what we got wrong. Be specific.

What kind of financial interested person sends such an email to Armstrong? Very weird.
I wouldn't be surprised that all those emails are from all his own schizophrenic personalities.

nstrdms

jr. member

Activity: 35

Merit: 1

Quote from: DanB1 on January 23, 2020, 03:01:14 AM

MA now says we could make new highs and rally further into 2022 as soon as the DOW takes out last Friday's high.
Always waiting on the sidelines for the next move. If we go up further he could just say that the trust in banks has become so low that people are forced into the stock market.

Source?

DanB1

jr. member

Activity: 100

Merit: 1

Quote from: s29 on January 22, 2020, 01:43:22 PM

Quote from: DanB1 on January 22, 2020, 11:37:27 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Well, here we are at new all time highs. I hope no one actually followed Armstrong's call because you would have gotten blown out. This is a bull market, you know!

Not yet for the DOW. When MA talks about the US market, he means the Dow Jones.
But it won't take long probably. We might see a new high today or tomorrow.

That's another funny thing, the whole thing from Armstrong about "Smart Money" and the the Dow. The Dow is a heavily flauwed index, by the way it's weighted and by the almost constant Boeing soap. Such a stupid thing to pay so much attention to the Dow.

I agree. Most (bigger) investors here in Europe invest in the SP500 and Nasdaq Composite, not the DOW.
The DOW is more what is used in MSM.

DanB1

jr. member

Activity: 100

Merit: 1

MA now says we could make new highs and rally further into 2022 as soon as the DOW takes out last Friday's high.
Always waiting on the sidelines for the next move. If we go up further he could just say that the trust in banks has become so low that people are forced into the stock market.

Topic: Martin Armstrong Discussion - page 46. (Read 647170 times)