Real Madrid - Fenerbahce
Under 160.5
Odds:2.00
bet:2$
Topic: Martingale Basketball Betting System (Read 5156 times)
Real Madrid - Fenerbahce
Under 160.5
Odds:2.00
bet:2$
Darussafaka - Barcelona 67 : 56
Assets: 122$
chart is coming soon
Assets: 122$
chart is coming soon
Your strategy is not reliable, you know the martingale system is the worst thing in the world, I prefer febonnaci system or flat betting system.
Darussafaka - Barcelona
Under 150.5
Odds:2.00
bet:2$
Washington Wizards - Dallas Mavericks 107 : 112
Assets: 120$
chart is coming soon
Assets: 120$
chart is coming soon
Washington Wizards - Dallas Mavericks
Over 208.5
Odds:2.00
bet:2$
Sacramento Kings - Orlando Magic 120 : 115
Assets: 118$
chart is coming soon
Assets: 118$
chart is coming soon
Im amazed that this journey of OP is still alive and playing sportsbetting on basketball game does somehow able to survive a long period but seeing on the results it only generates small amount or didnt have any profit at all.Checking the chart you almost lose half of the bankroll but still able to manage to back it up because of martingale.
Sacramento Kings - Orlando Magic
Over 207.5
Odds:2.00
bet:16$
Olympiacos CFP - Darussafak 81 : 73
Assets: 88$
chart is coming soon
Assets: 88$
chart is coming soon
Rethymno - PAOK
Over 153.5
Odds:2.00
bet:8$
Olympiacos CFP - Darussafak 81 : 73
Assets: 104$
chart is coming soon
Assets: 104$
chart is coming soon
Olympiacos CFP - Darussafaka
Under 151.5
Odds:2.00
bet:4$
Kutno - Anwil Wloclawek 88 : 95
Assets: 112$
chart is coming soon
Assets: 112$
chart is coming soon
This is really a dangerous game you're playing OP. I've tried this in college and lost a lot of funds on this style. Especially if you are betting on different leagues and teams. It is like using martingale on different casino games every bet. Well, I wish the best of luck to you, but be careful, if you get a long losing streak then you'll for sure won't be able to fund the amount of bets you need.
have you seen the graph provided by OP? Does this show dangerous? If you can see he bet and have a continous losing streak but in just one win he is back in track again with profit. This is much better than using martingale method in dice.
You are a young and stupid fool that think that you'll win something out of martin gale! Wherever you use that system you'll lose in the end. Why? Because martin gale system is profitable, that is undisputed. But the fact of the matter is, martin gale system assumes that you have unlimited funds to gamble with. Which means that you need to fund you bets even if you have lost a thousand times! I don't think anyone has an unlimited amount of funds to really use martin gale effectively.
This is really a dangerous game you're playing OP. I've tried this in college and lost a lot of funds on this style. Especially if you are betting on different leagues and teams. It is like using martingale on different casino games every bet. Well, I wish the best of luck to you, but be careful, if you get a long losing streak then you'll for sure won't be able to fund the amount of bets you need.
have you seen the graph provided by OP? Does this show dangerous? If you can see he bet and have a continous losing streak but in just one win he is back in track again with profit. This is much better than using martingale method in dice.
You are a young and stupid fool that think that you'll win something out of martin gale! Wherever you use that system you'll lose in the end. Why? Because martin gale system is profitable, that is undisputed. But the fact of the matter is, martin gale system assumes that you have unlimited funds to gamble with. Which means that you need to fund you bets even if you have lost a thousand times! I don't think anyone has an unlimited amount of funds to really use martin gale effectively.
This is really a dangerous game you're playing OP. I've tried this in college and lost a lot of funds on this style. Especially if you are betting on different leagues and teams. It is like using martingale on different casino games every bet. Well, I wish the best of luck to you, but be careful, if you get a long losing streak then you'll for sure won't be able to fund the amount of bets you need.
have you seen the graph provided by OP? Does this show dangerous? If you can see he bet and have a continous losing streak but in just one win he is back in track again with profit. This is much better than using martingale method in dice.
And what if you lose a bunch in a row?
Even if you won't say it's "dangerous" maybe a little homework can show you how it's stupid. If each bet is really 50/50, the odds of winning 8 in a row are the same as losing 8 in a row. With this method you win 8 bucks by winning 8 in a row, how much do you lose if you lose 8 in a row?
Not to mention this experiment somehow has every bet at 2.0 odds, maybe martingale would work in a magical fairlyand with no juice.
It's a bit more complicated in the case of sport betting.
On dice and roulette yeah I agree martingale doesn't work. But on sports it's slightly different because the odds are... They're strange things. It's not because you bet on a 2:1 game that it will indeed have 50% chance of winning.
Martingale, if you're already a good gambler, can help reduce even more the potential losses you might have
Though I don't understand how the system of martin gale OP is using, since he is betting not on the same team or even league. Probably, he is picking a good chance on a team then martin gale the bet amount. Though that is hard, since he relies on his ability to analyse the games he is betting on.
I still agree with the others. Martin gale is dangerous! Even if the chances changes and can be influenced if you analyse the game you are betting on.
This is really a dangerous game you're playing OP. I've tried this in college and lost a lot of funds on this style. Especially if you are betting on different leagues and teams. It is like using martingale on different casino games every bet. Well, I wish the best of luck to you, but be careful, if you get a long losing streak then you'll for sure won't be able to fund the amount of bets you need.
have you seen the graph provided by OP? Does this show dangerous? If you can see he bet and have a continous losing streak but in just one win he is back in track again with profit. This is much better than using martingale method in dice.
And what if you lose a bunch in a row?
Even if you won't say it's "dangerous" maybe a little homework can show you how it's stupid. If each bet is really 50/50, the odds of winning 8 in a row are the same as losing 8 in a row. With this method you win 8 bucks by winning 8 in a row, how much do you lose if you lose 8 in a row?
Not to mention this experiment somehow has every bet at 2.0 odds, maybe martingale would work in a magical fairlyand with no juice.
It's a bit more complicated in the case of sport betting.
On dice and roulette yeah I agree martingale doesn't work. But on sports it's slightly different because the odds are... They're strange things. It's not because you bet on a 2:1 game that it will indeed have 50% chance of winning.
Martingale, if you're already a good gambler, can help reduce even more the potential losses you might have
Even on small profits i could say martingale system on betting on sports basketball is somehow profitable but its time consuming and still cant be assured if you are not good enough on choosing on the teams but for OP thanks for trying this thing out to show into the community.
Thats what I'm saying. It may be a good strategy, and may also be a profitable way to bet, though it is really time consuming and a long time of waiting for the result. Well, you must be really patient with this king of betting.
Also you need to be patient doing this kind of betting.
Hey OP! you are tired of posting your picks here, where is the update, I'm interested of knowing the outcome of your journey as currently you are still in profit now. Although you do not hit your target profit yet but so far that was impressive, I hope you'll update this if you have time so you can share good ideas to us to win.
Jump to: