Why do not you go on, but I was following you, everyone was curious about you, please continue.
adding: martingale doesnt work
Topic: Martingale Basketball Betting System - page 10. (Read 5156 times)
The biggest issue is that you are not getting the same odds across the board for your bets.
Martingale is based on the fact that you always have the same return if you win. If you bet with sportsbetting at 1.77 and the next at 1.82, there is already a difference. Suppose you lose the 1.82 bet and then win the 1.77 bet with double the amount, you have to start over from the first amount but your winnings are not one bet more than what you lost.
i have done this kind betting style applied in sports , the result good enough.Martingale is based on the fact that you always have the same return if you win. If you bet with sportsbetting at 1.77 and the next at 1.82, there is already a difference. Suppose you lose the 1.82 bet and then win the 1.77 bet with double the amount, you have to start over from the first amount but your winnings are not one bet more than what you lost.
to get over the different odds in every event you can adjust the bet amount to make it feel like having 2x multiplier.
at least doing martingale on sportsbetting much better than have to do it on dice. good luck btw.
I made money by trying this method for a while. I want to test it here.
Suppose I have $ 100
I see your title and im didn't know their a martingale in basketball (sportsbook betting) in my opinion its coincidence only you win because of some unexpected happen.Why you didn't share it? if its effective. Suppose I have $ 100
Seems that its just a new idea trying to use this strategy only thing is odd is not the same so if you double your bets outcome will be depend from the odds so much better to make much bigger bets in order to make a good outcome but i will check your next post mate. Goodluck
I dont think martingale method would be ideal to use on sports betting since its not really the same as dice.For me i dont think it would be effective but if its works for OP then its really great. Lets say you lose the first bet and now you lose the 2nd one and so on,i dont think it would work but such a waste of time.Better to play according on your analysis on each team.
It depends but if you do martingale stratedgy for me you will win and with your analysis let say you lose at 1-3 bets and your fourth bet wins then go back to your bet price on first bet as you win it will be applicable it is a win win situation .But the only problem there is the amount of bet capacity for them to use martingale stratedgy.This is the first time im gonna witness a martingale strategy in a sports betting, but I think martingale will take you lots of time to see how it works. Remember you have to bet, wait for the result and then bet again another day. I think it is more exciting to use reverse martingale where you double your bet when you win
. I dont think martingale method would be ideal to use on sports betting since its not really the same as dice.For me i dont think it would be effective but if its works for OP then its really great. Lets say you lose the first bet and now you lose the 2nd one and so on,i dont think it would work but such a waste of time.Better to play according on your analysis on each team.
It depends but if you do martingale stratedgy for me you will win and with your analysis let say you lose at 1-3 bets and your fourth bet wins then go back to your bet price on first bet as you win it will be applicable it is a win win situation .But the only problem there is the amount of bet capacity for them to use martingale stratedgy. 
The biggest issue is that you are not getting the same odds across the board for your bets.
Martingale is based on the fact that you always have the same return if you win. If you bet with sportsbetting at 1.77 and the next at 1.82, there is already a difference. Suppose you lose the 1.82 bet and then win the 1.77 bet with double the amount, you have to start over from the first amount but your winnings are not one bet more than what you lost.
Martingale is based on the fact that you always have the same return if you win. If you bet with sportsbetting at 1.77 and the next at 1.82, there is already a difference. Suppose you lose the 1.82 bet and then win the 1.77 bet with double the amount, you have to start over from the first amount but your winnings are not one bet more than what you lost.
I dont think martingale method would be ideal to use on sports betting since its not really the same as dice.For me i dont think it would be effective but if its works for OP then its really great. Lets say you lose the first bet and now you lose the 2nd one and so on,i dont think it would work but such a waste of time.Better to play according on your analysis on each team.
Been thinking that martingale could be effective in sports betting, I am the first person to comment in this thread because I am very much interested to know if this will really work. Dude, you can start your experiment and be more detailed, I am surely gonna keep an eye on your thread.
17-01-2017 13:50 BC Nizhny Novgorod - Lietuvos Rytas(+ 2.50) Pick:2 Odds:2.00 Bet:1$
Remain:99$
Remain:99$
I made money by trying this method for a while. I want to test it here.
Suppose I have $ 100
Suppose I have $ 100
Jump to: