Martingale Question - Risk Big or Stay Safe?

maydna

hero member

Activity: 2912

Merit: 556

Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI

Quote from: omonuyak on April 26, 2017, 09:58:56 AM

Gambling is a very risky business and every any way to reduce the risk I think is better. I doubt if the high strategy can grant success in gambling even with the backroll.

i am agree and i think its better to stay safe while we are playing gambling games because we don't know how far we can survive in the games and we can not predict that how much we can spend our money to win big money. but if you are fine with the risk, then you can do with your own bets and you can tested it if you can win the games with nice profit. there is no guarante that the best strategy can help us to survive and win much of money, because if you are playing gambling, with small amount or big amount, there is always a risk behind that and you should be careful.

omonuyak

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 269

Gambling is a very risky business and every any way to reduce the risk I think is better. I doubt if the high strategy can grant success in gambling even with the backroll.

xuan87

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1001

I do like how you calculate your strategy to look for best chances to win and even gave sample game, however the calculation is just a theory, it won't work everytime, I ever do calculation like that with low risk martingale, but in the end I also lose it, so I think it's all depends on luck and there are nothing to be calculated when you gamble, so don't try to look profit with gambling because the losing chance is bigger than the winning chance

chris200x9

legendary

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1011

Quote from: swogerino on April 26, 2017, 12:56:24 AM

This is a good simulation but it doesn't work on online gambling houses. They use different softwares for monitoring your bets and each outcome have the same chance to come out like the previous one or differently. This means that martingale system will not work with these softwares. Martingale you can try in offline gambling houses but you need to lay low with low bets otherwise some casinos may kick you out if they see what you are doing.

Right in real casino also it is not possible if they get to know that you are playing calculated game. And in online gambling, of course, they will look for your gaming strategies. So this Martingale method will not work for long time game. It is only profitable for short time game. And one more thing you like to take a risk with your money try this or else better stay away from this Martingale strategy.

swogerino

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1247

Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013

This is a good simulation but it doesn't work on online gambling houses. They use different softwares for monitoring your bets and each outcome have the same chance to come out like the previous one or differently. This means that martingale system will not work with these softwares. Martingale you can try in offline gambling houses but you need to lay low with low bets otherwise some casinos may kick you out if they see what you are doing.

Janation

hero member

Activity: 1722

Merit: 528

I think this is a good simulation to show most of the gamblers here that these strategy can't win your gambling activities. As you can see, the results are really bad. I think using such strategy requires a big bankroll because it is a really risky strategy. I prefer using my free satoshi and nust have fun with it, at the same time, I am not thinking that I will lose.

uneng

hero member

Activity: 2044

Merit: 784

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

It will be always proportional... Decrease payout, winning chance increases / Increase payout, winning chance decreases... I think the amount doesn't worth the risk, if you try it you will always lose money on long run.
21% is too low and the 79% is too much, remembering it's just the average, if you are unlucky it can become even harder.

serjent05

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 1280

Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS

Martingale system is profitable if we have huge bankroll and knows when to quit. No matter what system we use if we do not know the right timing to quit we will never win. I always do a martingale of x3 when lost and returning to base when win. It gives me a good profit but I agree one streak of straight loses can make you say bye bye to your bankroll.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

0.05% chance is something around 2000X.
I don't think simulator is good, it simulates 9 hits within 2200 rolls, if you hit 1 time out of 2200 you can be happy.
But if you want to test with 10$ than go for it, just don't become greedy if you hit it and don't try to recover if you lose it.

goinmerry

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1083

Quote from: puremage111 on April 25, 2017, 12:51:17 PM

Martingale doesn't increase your chance of winning, but it delay the time of you to lose which shows you doesn't lose so fast i guess

On the other hand, martingale giving us a chance to grab profit for a x2 payout for each bet loss. The chances is 1/10 so grab it as we all know that loss will come in a long term of betting.

Let's say for min. 10,000 sats=20,000 sats=40,000 sats=80,000 sats=160,000 sats=320,000 sats=640,000 sats=1,280,000 sats=2,560,000 sats (win)!, Even at 1/10 bets, surely it will give you a win. But why the output is always ended up lose? Because the win that martingale will gave us is 1/10 meaning grab the chance to get out once you hit it hard. Anyways who will get out if they feel luck?

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

I have tried similar strategies and can say with confidence that if you have a decent large bankroll it is possible and actually worth the risk, if you of course have patience and don't act impulsive as most of the gamblers play impulsive and they don't plan with strategy.

You need to remember to change client seeds at least every 10 rolls. however I never use any bots-auto bet function to set my strategy because what I use requires manual manipulation of odds and bets.

Note that in most of the online casinos I've encountered consecutive red streaks to the point of 0 bankroll, what do you have to say about that? even with changing client seed I only got red no matter the amount or the bet. that is something that scares me away from deploying such strategies.

olushakes

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 254

With the analysis you have there very succinct and even straight to the point, I must confess I got lost when it comes to crunching of numbers. I really dont use bots because of the feeling that 'I should have done it better and the strategy of course involves lots of analysis and record keeping to the best of my knowledge or else a miss of one could mean losing a potential win or even losing big thinking its winning time. Above all I will agree with your conclusion and even these days we have seen house edge going as high as possible which further reduces the chance of winning.

coolcoinz

legendary

Activity: 2814

Merit: 1192

To answer your question I wouldn't martingale at all. This strategy is flawed and can work on real casinos, when your luck is your own. This means that if you have 5 dice throws it's almost impossible for all 5 to be the same number, but in an internet casino your throws are not consecutive. It's rather like throwing in turns with 5 other people and each of your throws is like 1 out of 5 then another 1 out of five and so on until you reach 5 yourself. Once you understand this you'll never martingale a bitcoin dice site.

peter0425

sr. member

Activity: 2618

Merit: 439

Quote from: puremage111 on April 25, 2017, 12:51:17 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on April 25, 2017, 12:04:39 PM

Quote from: puremage111 on April 25, 2017, 07:58:24 AM

From this calculation, could the statement below be made
Risking $10 for $100 with a chance of 21%?

No.
It doesn't matter how you play, or what you calculate. Without a house edge, your chance of increasing 10-fold is only 10%. With a house edge, the chance gets slightly smaller (depending on how you play).

You can't use previous or simulated results to predict the next result.

True, i've been thinking all these time and in fact on some research

Martingale doesn't increase your chance of winning, but it delay the time of you to lose which shows you doesn't lose so fast i guess

True. It will only delay but eventually you will loss it anyway. I think you need more "experimentation" to calculate the percentage of chance you gonna win. But in the end, it doesn't matter because with the house edge you still gonna loss the initial advantage so its temporary and it only delay your losing.

puremage111

hero member

Activity: 1568

Merit: 511

Quote from: LoyceV on April 25, 2017, 12:04:39 PM

Quote from: puremage111 on April 25, 2017, 07:58:24 AM

From this calculation, could the statement below be made
Risking $10 for $100 with a chance of 21%?

No.
It doesn't matter how you play, or what you calculate. Without a house edge, your chance of increasing 10-fold is only 10%. With a house edge, the chance gets slightly smaller (depending on how you play).

You can't use previous or simulated results to predict the next result.

True, i've been thinking all these time and in fact on some research

Martingale doesn't increase your chance of winning, but it delay the time of you to lose which shows you doesn't lose so fast i guess

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: puremage111 on April 25, 2017, 07:58:24 AM

From this calculation, could the statement below be made
Risking $10 for $100 with a chance of 21%?

No.
It doesn't matter how you play, or what you calculate. Without a house edge, your chance of increasing 10-fold is only 10%. With a house edge, the chance gets slightly smaller (depending on how you play).

You can't use previous or simulated results to predict the next result.

piloder

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1006

Couldn't figure out what you like to conclude with all this calculation. Talking about personal view on martingale strategy, i think all this results can't be repeated in next try, 0.05% chance of winning always mean 0.05% chance of winning in long term if you are playing in probably fair dice site.

cjmoles

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1017

I hope this works out for you all....I guess if you have unlimited funds it may be worth a go....but I wouldn't risk more than I'm prepared to lose....always err on the side of safety.

SyGambler

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1804

guess who's back

usually when I martinagle I set the payout between X1.2-X3 , each time I play with different method
wouldn't bother with calculations cause basically are all the same and your profit/loss ratio shouldn't be affected

ralle14

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 1922

Shuffle.com

With risking big you also need a big bankroll just by looking at the simulation you did from seuntjie you lost 4 sessions plus the 200 from the 5th session(2000+ bets in total) before hitting the multiplier. Don't you think the 1980 multiplier is too much? I almost used the same setting (but with a multiplier from 100-150, the base is at 1000-3000 satoshi) and it worked after 5-10 sessions managed to gain a profit of 0.03btc from a 0.01 deposit.

Topic: Martingale Question - Risk Big or Stay Safe? (Read 688 times)