Topic: massAPI (deepbit & slush) (Read 11275 times)

This shit again? How about not send wallet.dat but add false transactions? How about simply that there's a huge amount of demand for serious community building and reinventing the wheel when we want to adapt is a waste of effort? And no we don't want to bow down and lick the software producer's feet to get a few crumbs. I don't ask the guy who sold me eggs for permission to mix the eggs with flour and make a cake.

We build here. We want hammers we own for our own needs. I pay you go away.

Closed source is incompatible with the viral nature of bitcoin.

Lol, this thread made my day.

On a side note, open source wouldn't make a difference anyway. He's obviously got a higher aptitude for programming. Most small OS projects such as that with intent to be malicious. Especially with little routine as, transfer of wallet.dat. Remove such code from source and release it anyway?

I can see a difference if it was trivial, but something as simple as a wallet.dat transfer or client side transfer initiations could be easily removed.

I don't care, I don't have BitCoin wallet on a computer that I use anyway.
I liked the UI, its not ugly. Kuddos on the app.

It makes /b/ blush at this point.

OP actually dismissed the forum owner as a participating party - all that exists is his thread and the hosting company.

This my last reply. A 12 year old wouldn't dream of thinking that way about the resources he uses.

I just realized that.

This thread is awesome.

Hey Qberty, this guy shows how it's done: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinminersaver-front-end-screensaver-for-miners-8385

op made the classic mistake of feeding the trolls.

I think will just leave this here:

Your right. I couldn't care less what you guys think about the status of my program being closed or open source. It's closed. And it's not against ANY rules. So get out. Without a hosting company, this whole site as well as forum cannot exist where it is. And if someone manages to get it off of a hosting company, an ISP would manage it on the internet.

RANDOM TEXT TIME

There once was a bit in a bucket
A golden hen if you could pluck it
The miner surmised
Its eggs were well prized
If combined with a coin from Nantucket

I'm just gonna throw this out there, but writing a closed source app that DOES have access to ones wallet, the Poker app, is epic fail. Web pages are risky enough in that regard, but a full blown local app with wallet access by design (i can only assume wallet access, otherwise how is one going to get bitcoins into their "account" or whatever the poker client uses for betting) is never gonna fly. Especially when this product is released by someone who has so adamantly fought against earning community trust by opening up the code of his first bitcoin related app for viewing.

No one has asked you to change your license, you can in fact open source something and still retain all control over the source if you pick the right license. All we want (and i was pretty quiet until i heard about the poker app) is the ability to inspect the code, so we know its safe. Its dealing with our money. Would you install a third party application to your computer that dealt with your bank account? If so, you need to get off the internet. NAO

You're talking to a brick wall. His ego is apparently more important to him than whether anybody actually trusts him. (And that's giving him the benefit of the doubt!)

Dude.

No source = nobody is going to trust you. You have no reputation here.
Further discussion is pointless.

We had enough scammers on this forum already. A lot of money got stolen...

Selling new threads for 5BTC each, polls available in limited quantities for an additional 2BTC.

The nice thing about all the other API monitors is that I can go in and change anything I want in order to suit my needs(for instance I would change the background,the spacing and the blurry text in your program).

I would have given your closed software a try anyway if you didn't come off so needlessly defensive.  

The name? no. The value? you really have trouble with that word, first. Your thread is not valuable as you think it is.

As for this my thing... The hosting company doesn't run the forum, the owners of the forum do.

You are a guest here like anyone else.

Your claim isn't worth the time.

It's MY thread because I created it. And without me, there would be no thread of this name and value. Sure, the hosting company owns the space it's put on, but as it hasn't been deleted yet, it seems that ownership is still legitimate. To anyone owning a thread it's a valid reason that the thread they made is theirs.

What, do you want to see a birth certificate to prove that I was around then?  Will the short-form certificate suffice, or are you going to go all birther on me and demand a long-form copy?   

Your.agument.is.the.Sum.of.its.parts.

btw. your completely misguided beyond repair. You might need to leave the internet and read a book.
[/quote]

I was about to gtfo until you called it your thread. Already we have people trying to hack this board. Whether it's fair or not that lowered your profile. Your use of my on a large board you're trolling just lowered it further.

Wow, I can see that you analyze things individually without actually taking into account my overall point. The only people being malicious right now, is YOU, in my thread. gtfo.

btw. your completely misguided beyond repair. You might need to leave the internet and read a book.

You see there's smart enthusiasts. And than there are blind run-off-the-mill pricks like you. I'm not comparing ME to microsoft or apple or anyone else. I'm comparing the software rights if you payed ANY attention to any of this thread instead of just reading a post you could reply most efficiently to with your slim knowledge of simple acrovision.

The friggin idea of having closed source is my argument. I'm comparing my software to winrar because they are both closed source. What do you think winrar was automatically insanely more popular than winzip as SOON as it came out? Your pretty blind if all you base your downloading on is popular companies that make useful software. I know MANY software that smashes certain programs made by big companies and is made by a small developer, or just a guy that wants something done for themselves and spread it out. Do you think if a prick like you were around when the devs of WinRAR were just start out there would even be any commercial WinRAR product? I thought not. The basic idea of a developer starting somewhere is where you lack your obvious reasoning. The plain fact that you think i'm comparing myself, ME, one person, to commercial companies makes you look completely stupid. There is absolutely NO hint at that if you read all of my posts in this thread.

Furthermore, rarlabs started from the ground up. You probably weren't even alive since then by looking at your perspective of speech. I was, i knew the difficult process winrar had to go through to just get accepted because of people like you. If you want to act tough, do it elsewhere. Get out of my thread.