Pages:
Author

Topic: massAPI (deepbit & slush) - page 2. (Read 11209 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
May 13, 2011, 12:26:23 PM
#64
Now he wants to do poker tables? Run for your lives!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
May 13, 2011, 12:24:28 PM
#63
Take weeks? You sir need to leave this thread, you clearly don't belong if your making irrational assumptions. If you like that winGadget then use it.

Your ability to imitate every blowhard that ever lived is astounding.

Quote
The sole fact that anyone from this forum is going to bash a close source program JUST because there are open sourced programs makes you an ignorant prick by definition.

LOL. You need to stop taking shit personally. It prevents you from listening and perhaps learning something.

Culture trumps features. There's plenty of you opportunists looking to drink the blood of this community. You can call us culturally conservative if you like.

Quote
I don't need anyone of you paramaniacs to even be in this thread. Your all lucky I can't stop certain people from coming in this thread because so far, only like 2-3 of you have actually defended my point versus the 20 other people who downloaded my app without complaining versus the ignorant pricks that rather claim my code as malicious.

No one claimed it was. They simply said we have a filter against abusers and we'll happily go elsewhere.

We are not driven by entertainment, distractions, ignorance of our environment. We care more about our culture than we do about petty product features. We will use less featured software if it promotes our culture. Deal with it. Stop assuming you deserve anything. All the time you or anyone spends on a product is nothing more than a bet, a bet that people give a shit about your product. Because if they don't give a shit, you bet that they might like it is irrelevant and wasted.

Quote
There is more closed source than open source. Now get out of my thread, I don't need you to progress what i'm doing.

And there's more Bonzo Buddy shit than there is productive software. I don't use it.

And the thread exists in our forum. You're a guest just like the rest of us douchebag.

Quote
The poker system is almost complete.

Translation: "Den I pick up some escort ladies in Vegas. Pahrtee down, Mon!"

Quote
I'm integrating Bitcoins,Bitpennies,Play bitcoins,Play bitpennies.

You're trading numbers between files. Genius. /sarcasm

Quote
Multiple converters to allow money deposits for both money and bitcoins as well as some other planned currencies.

Without a culture behind them, they're a flash in the pan. We move faster than you do.
Come to think of it the more you tell us, the less source code we need, but go on. Your trolling days are over.

Quote
I'm also going to make a web interface so the maniacs of the internet can successfully eradicate me stealing wallet.dat's and bitcoins and all that jazz. But that's not it's main purpose. It would allow a user to configure their whole profile without having the program to run.

What again? You can write HTML? LOL. Guys bring this guy your virgin daughters to sacrifice on his e-altar. He's got teh HTMLs!

Quote
I'm also making the worlds first reverse-connect poker system aswell, which will allow you to host your own tables (as servers on ports) + charge fees Wink. Tournaments will take place within the system to allow free users with no deposit at all to make bitcoins and bitpennies. If that screams malicious then i'm probably in the wrong area of the internet.

First, you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
May 13, 2011, 11:37:28 AM
#62
I have every right to close source software I make just like anyone else. Everyone here, is just way too paranoid to realize they all use closed source software. People use WinRAR almost every day. It does a simple task of compressing a file JUST like WinAce and WinZIP which already come with windows. WinRAR has smaller functions that are widespread. Now tell me an open source program that kept it's same support team for over 2 years, plus made enough income to actually make it worth the time minus any donations.

You need to lose your illusions of grandeur.  First you compared yourself to Microsoft and Apple (hahaha), and now you've "settled" for WinRAR.  WinRAR, which has a cumulative number of hundreds of millions (if not billions) of downloads, has been around for nearly two decades, and is backed by a multi-million-dollar company.

You and Rarlab are nothing alike.  Please understand that.  I'm a Free Software guy.  I love programs with available source code because, even if I don't ever personally inspect them, others have.  But I'm not an ideologue.  I run proprietary software too, including, yes, you guessed it, WinRAR.  But WinRAR has earned a bit of trust in my regard.  And would I download a new closed source tool by Microsoft if I thought it was useful?  Yes, I would.  Would I download a new closed source tool from a complete unknown that would have the potential to completely wipe out all of my Bitcoin holdings?  No, I wouldn't.

FFS guy, you are not Microsoft, you are not Apple, you are not Rarlab, you are just some random guy on the Internet releasing software in an area with a high potential for risk and with an already existing history of fraud.  You haven't earned anyone's trust.  And yet you don't understand at all why people might want to see the source so they can make an evaluation for themselves of the software?  Get over yourself.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
May 13, 2011, 11:29:06 AM
#61
If someone is so bent on the intent that this program has malicious code, then you guys know where to find Olly. Learn assembly and start exploring the code. Specifically for strings like wallet.dat.

When you don't find the malicious code, then come back and of course apologize to the developer.
I'm not sure if you're being serious, but assuming it was obfuscated even to a simple degree it would likely take weeks to disassemble and follow through the code to a degree you could be sure of what it does. Personally if I particularly wanted the functions I'd rather spend a day and write my own version. There's already a Javascript based Windows gadget floating around that's very easy to verify.

Take weeks? You sir need to leave this thread, you clearly don't belong if your making irrational assumptions. If you like that winGadget then use it.

The sole fact that anyone from this forum is going to bash a close source program JUST because there are open sourced programs makes you an ignorant prick by definition. I don't need anyone of you paramaniacs to even be in this thread. Your all lucky I can't stop certain people from coming in this thread because so far, only like 2-3 of you have actually defended my point versus the 20 other people who downloaded my app without complaining versus the ignorant pricks that rather claim my code as malicious.

If you REALLY think it's malicious based on the fact that I simply decide to continue to make software in closed source you all need to open your eyes. There is more closed source than open source. Now get out of my thread, I don't need you to progress what i'm doing.

//On a side note (to the people that read my posts + support my opinion, yeah, all two of you), The poker system is almost complete. I'm integrating Bitcoins,Bitpennies,Play bitcoins,Play bitpennies. Multiple converters to allow money deposits for both money and bitcoins as well as some other planned currencies. I'm also going to make a web interface so the maniacs of the internet can successfully eradicate me stealing wallet.dat's and bitcoins and all that jazz. But that's not it's main purpose. It would allow a user to configure their whole profile without having the program to run. I'm also making the worlds first reverse-connect poker system aswell, which will allow you to host your own tables (as servers on ports) + charge fees Wink. Tournaments will take place within the system to allow free users with no deposit at all to make bitcoins and bitpennies. If that screams malicious then i'm probably in the wrong area of the internet.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
May 13, 2011, 10:10:31 AM
#60
If someone is so bent on the intent that this program has malicious code, then you guys know where to find Olly. Learn assembly and start exploring the code. Specifically for strings like wallet.dat.

When you don't find the malicious code, then come back and of course apologize to the developer.
I'm not sure if you're being serious, but assuming it was obfuscated even to a simple degree it would likely take weeks to disassemble and follow through the code to a degree you could be sure of what it does. Personally if I particularly wanted the functions I'd rather spend a day and write my own version. There's already a Javascript based Windows gadget floating around that's very easy to verify.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
May 13, 2011, 09:51:33 AM
#59
If someone is so bent on the intent that this program has malicious code, then you guys know where to find Olly. Learn assembly and start exploring the code. Specifically for strings like wallet.dat.

When you don't find the malicious code, then come back and of course apologize to the developer.

You guys really have trouble with the concept of culture.

Culture trumps profit. Developer? LOL. Anyone with a little guts and free time is a developer. It's not a special ahievement here, because we all do it. He isn't one Ayn Rand among drooling acolytes. For all you know we are an army of Ayn Rands.

"Apologize to the developer". Children, say "Thank you" to the nice electrician who turned on the power for your PS3s. "Someday you'll grow up to be like him. Now eat yer vegetables."

Please take your patronizing, condescending, elitist notions elsewhere. We're doing work here.

He's an opportunist who doesn't appreciate where this currency is going. And some of the uses people will be applying it to are a priority that is absolutely incompatible with his customer / vendor, server / client bias.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 13, 2011, 06:58:34 AM
#58
If someone is so bent on the intent that this program has malicious code, then you guys know where to find Olly. Learn assembly and start exploring the code. Specifically for strings like wallet.dat.

When you don't find the malicious code, then come back and of course apologize to the developer.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
May 13, 2011, 05:11:03 AM
#57
Too late. move along.

You're too late.

Take any open source poker software add a bitcoin backend and you're done.

But worse you actually want to go into a business that just rammed up the chute by the US government and risk the whole enterprise to attack.

Fuck you, sir.
Fuck you very much with a hockey stick.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
May 13, 2011, 04:04:03 AM
#56
Given that you refuse to even acknowledge the nature of the issue, I have no choice but to conclude that you most likely have malicious intentions.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
May 12, 2011, 11:01:01 PM
#55
Too late. move along.
hero member
Activity: 551
Merit: 500
May 12, 2011, 08:52:51 PM
#54
Don't waste your time.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
May 12, 2011, 06:19:26 PM
#53
lol.

I'm designing the worlds first bitcoin powered poker system. Let's hope noone beats me to it. And I'm going to seriously laugh at who ever says to open source THAT.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
May 12, 2011, 05:56:12 PM
#52
And slush / tycho all due respect all of us were new at sometime and even senior members can be shady

I would go GNU because my value is community and it eats opportunity like nothing else.

Now watch this drive.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
May 12, 2011, 03:06:19 AM
#51
But would you open source your pools ?

There is a huge difference - closed source pool cannot access your computer. As you're sending every small bit of earned bitcoins to your wallet from the pool, there is no chance how I can steal your coins.

Usually I'm not paranoid (I'm using Windows, Skype etc), but realistic, because there was malicious software stealing wallets before some time already.
full member
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
May 12, 2011, 12:53:38 AM
#50
And slush / tycho all due respect all of us were new at sometime and even senior members can be shady

But would you open source your pools ? No I
 Sure you wouldn't why because if you did A people could find bugs and exploit costing you money everyone would have there own pools and ultimatly all your hardwork would be worthless

What if the op wants after testing and proven working to charge a small  fee for his work ... He couldn't could he because it would be open source

I understand concerns but as tycho suggested there isn't much can be done with the API itself the concern would be more key logger based or possibly round robinging the miners to his own private pool Thou even if that were the case it sure wouldn't be very long before it was discovered
full member
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
May 12, 2011, 12:37:45 AM
#49
If you guys are sooooooooo worried set your payout threshold higher and send the btc to a mybitcoin.com address and monitor your network traffic for anything suspicious on top of that monitor system file changes to see if there are keylogging like software ect and if your super paranoid just send to another instance of bitcoin disconnect that machine from the tubes and test quit being paranoid lol gawd

You blindly download closed source software daily Most of you
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
yung lean
May 12, 2011, 12:37:18 AM
#48
welcome to the bitcoin community qberty. the place is populated by paranoid anarchists so here you're presumed guilty until proven innocent.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
May 12, 2011, 12:24:55 AM
#47
Updated the download link. Some people couldn't download the first version.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
May 09, 2011, 07:09:49 PM
#46
Closed source makes money.

So does open source. Why money when you could have bitcoins?

Quote
Doesn't intrigue corruption,

This is vague and paranoid. You clearly don't know how computers work. Nobody can force their code on you.

Quote
and it's more profitable in many other ways.

You don't read the news much.

Quote
I'm stuck on this bullshit because noone on this board would leave my thread alone about open source. I could careless about it.

Infact, i've gotten more downloads of this program in particular from users other than this forum board. So it that's a small display margin for how corrupting you fools are. You strive to complain and defend your own opinions when i'm not even here to listen to it. I'm here to provide a program to the people who use it. If none of you realized by now, atleast 10 people downloaded it from this board. Aside from the pricks who are arguing, some people on this board didn't care that it was open source. And 10 downloads can provide enough feedback for something as small as this. So closed source IS working for me. If you want to do it open sourced, then by all means. But don't try to infuse your opinion into mine by invalidating my own experience.

Kings must have subjects.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 250
May 08, 2011, 02:21:31 PM
#45
Closed source makes money. Doesn't intrigue corruption, and it's more profitable in many other ways.

I'm stuck on this bullshit because noone on this board would leave my thread alone about open source. I could careless about it.

Infact, i've gotten more downloads of this program in particular from users other than this forum board. So it that's a small display margin for how corrupting you fools are. You strive to complain and defend your own opinions when i'm not even here to listen to it. I'm here to provide a program to the people who use it. If none of you realized by now, atleast 10 people downloaded it from this board. Aside from the pricks who are arguing, some people on this board didn't care that it was open source. And 10 downloads can provide enough feedback for something as small as this. So closed source IS working for me. If you want to do it open sourced, then by all means. But don't try to infuse your opinion into mine by invalidating my own experience.
Pages:
Jump to: